Am Mittwoch, 27. Juni 2007 15:06 schrieb Maxim Levitsky:
>
> Well, I almost sure that this is not true,
> or maybe you are not using dosemu 1.4.0, and other one behaves differently.
>
> Anyway, if I run dosemu 1.4.0 with that setting and stock freedos
> command.com the cpu usage is well below 5%,
On Tuesday 26 June 2007 12:48, Jan Kandziora wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 26. Juni 2007 03:44 schrieb Maxim Levitsky:
> > Hi.
> >
> > Try to set $_hogthreshold = (1) in dosemu.conf
> >
> > This helps a lot for me.
>
> This "nice"s the dosemu process -- I already use this setting. However, if
> no other
On Tuesday 26 June 2007 12:48, Jan Kandziora wrote:
Am Dienstag, 26. Juni 2007 03:44 schrieb Maxim Levitsky:
Hi.
Try to set $_hogthreshold = (1) in dosemu.conf
This helps a lot for me.
This nices the dosemu process -- I already use this setting. However, if
no other process is
Am Mittwoch, 27. Juni 2007 15:06 schrieb Maxim Levitsky:
Well, I almost sure that this is not true,
or maybe you are not using dosemu 1.4.0, and other one behaves differently.
Anyway, if I run dosemu 1.4.0 with that setting and stock freedos
command.com the cpu usage is well below 5%, and
Am Dienstag, 26. Juni 2007 03:44 schrieb Maxim Levitsky:
>
> Hi.
>
> Try to set $_hogthreshold = (1) in dosemu.conf
>
> This helps a lot for me.
>
This "nice"s the dosemu process -- I already use this setting. However, if no
other process is runnable, dosemu will get again all CPU power, which
Am Dienstag, 26. Juni 2007 03:44 schrieb Maxim Levitsky:
Hi.
Try to set $_hogthreshold = (1) in dosemu.conf
This helps a lot for me.
This nices the dosemu process -- I already use this setting. However, if no
other process is runnable, dosemu will get again all CPU power, which
disturbs
On Thursday 21 June 2007 22:11, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> On Jun 21 2007 21:00, Jan Kandziora wrote:
> >I know it's a crude idea for everyday Linux processes, but for
> >dosemu driven applications, which behave badly in a multitasking OS
> >*and* for which source code isn't available, it may be
On Thursday 21 June 2007 22:11, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
On Jun 21 2007 21:00, Jan Kandziora wrote:
I know it's a crude idea for everyday Linux processes, but for
dosemu driven applications, which behave badly in a multitasking OS
*and* for which source code isn't available, it may be worth to
On Jun 21 2007 21:00, Jan Kandziora wrote:
>I know it's a crude idea for everyday Linux processes, but for
>dosemu driven applications, which behave badly in a multitasking OS
>*and* for which source code isn't available, it may be worth to
>discuss.
Would dosbox do? (it does busy-loops too,
Am Donnerstag, 21. Juni 2007 20:26 schrieb Jan Engelhardt:
>
> Of course there may be hacks that try to figure out if a DOS window is
> idle, waiting for user input. (Seems like a new invention in Windows 2000
> and up). Since dosemu and all the emulators are not running a genuine
> Microsoft DOS
On Jun 21 2007 19:50, Jan Kandziora wrote:
>
>Dear all,
>
>I like to use an old DOS/Clipper application through DOSEMU on a Linux
>application server in a hotel. It works, but (as usual with DOS), it causes
>a processor load of 100% in certain situations, while just waiting for user
>interaction.
Dear all,
I like to use an old DOS/Clipper application through DOSEMU on a Linux
application server in a hotel. It works, but (as usual with DOS), it causes
a processor load of 100% in certain situations, while just waiting for user
interaction.
That's kind of stupid, as power saving is heavily
Dear all,
I like to use an old DOS/Clipper application through DOSEMU on a Linux
application server in a hotel. It works, but (as usual with DOS), it causes
a processor load of 100% in certain situations, while just waiting for user
interaction.
That's kind of stupid, as power saving is heavily
On Jun 21 2007 19:50, Jan Kandziora wrote:
Dear all,
I like to use an old DOS/Clipper application through DOSEMU on a Linux
application server in a hotel. It works, but (as usual with DOS), it causes
a processor load of 100% in certain situations, while just waiting for user
interaction.
Am Donnerstag, 21. Juni 2007 20:26 schrieb Jan Engelhardt:
Of course there may be hacks that try to figure out if a DOS window is
idle, waiting for user input. (Seems like a new invention in Windows 2000
and up). Since dosemu and all the emulators are not running a genuine
Microsoft DOS /
On Jun 21 2007 21:00, Jan Kandziora wrote:
I know it's a crude idea for everyday Linux processes, but for
dosemu driven applications, which behave badly in a multitasking OS
*and* for which source code isn't available, it may be worth to
discuss.
Would dosbox do? (it does busy-loops too, but at
16 matches
Mail list logo