[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Alexander Viro) wrote on 08.09.00 in
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> useless. Care to provide better example? I can, BTW, but it's much more
> convoluted and very rare. Furrfu...
Which is exactly the point *I* am trying to make. The problems you need a
debugger for are exactly the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Alexander Viro) wrote on 08.09.00 in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
useless. Care to provide better example? I can, BTW, but it's much more
convoluted and very rare. Furrfu...
Which is exactly the point *I* am trying to make. The problems you need a
debugger for are exactly the
On Thu, 7 Sep 2000, J. Dow wrote:
> > obpainintheass: haven't you anti-debugger-religion folks been claiming
> > that if you don't have a debugger you're forced to "think about the code
> > to find the correct fix"? so, like, why are you guessing right now? :)
>
> dean, that is another man
> obpainintheass: haven't you anti-debugger-religion folks been claiming
> that if you don't have a debugger you're forced to "think about the code
> to find the correct fix"? so, like, why are you guessing right now? :)
dean, that is another man behind the curtain we are supposed to ignore
obpainintheass: haven't you anti-debugger-religion folks been claiming
that if you don't have a debugger you're forced to "think about the code
to find the correct fix"? so, like, why are you guessing right now? :)
dean, that is another man behind the curtain we are supposed to ignore
when
Hi,
Here is another set of output from ksymoops as advised.
Thanks,
Sheldon.
ksymoops 2.3.4 on i686 2.4.0-test8. Options used
-V (default)
-k /proc/ksyms (default)
-l /proc/modules (default)
-o /lib/modules/2.4.0-test8/ (default)
-m /boot/System.map-2.4.0-test8
Also sprach dean gaudet:
} On Thu, 7 Sep 2000, Bill Wendling wrote:
} > Don't be stupid.
}
} dude, i gave at least three hints that i was joking up there. stupid
} would be if i claimed that it was obvious that a debugger would have
} helped this situation. instead all i'm claiming is that
On Thu, 7 Sep 2000, Bill Wendling wrote:
> Also sprach dean gaudet:
> } On Wed, 6 Sep 2000, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> }
> } > Yeah. Maybe we fixed truncate, and maybe we didn't. I've thought that we
> } > fixed it now several times, and I was always wrong.
> }
> } obpainintheass: haven't you
Also sprach dean gaudet:
} On Wed, 6 Sep 2000, Linus Torvalds wrote:
}
} > Yeah. Maybe we fixed truncate, and maybe we didn't. I've thought that we
} > fixed it now several times, and I was always wrong.
}
} obpainintheass: haven't you anti-debugger-religion folks been claiming
} that if you
On Wed, 6 Sep 2000, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Yeah. Maybe we fixed truncate, and maybe we didn't. I've thought that we
> fixed it now several times, and I was always wrong.
obpainintheass: haven't you anti-debugger-religion folks been claiming
that if you don't have a debugger you're forced to
Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Yeah. Maybe we fixed truncate, and maybe we didn't. I've thought that
> we fixed it now several times, and I was always wrong. Time for some
> reverse phychology:
>
> I'm sure this one doesn't fix the truncate bug either.
So far things look really promising here. No
Found another bug:
On Wed, Sep 06, 2000 at 03:26:14PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> - pre6:
> - trunate - the never-ending story. Makes me feel like a long
^ here
:-)
Tim.
*/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message
Found another bug:
On Wed, Sep 06, 2000 at 03:26:14PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
- pre6:
- trunate - the never-ending story. Makes me feel like a long
^ here
:-)
Tim.
*/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
On Wed, 6 Sep 2000, Linus Torvalds wrote:
Yeah. Maybe we fixed truncate, and maybe we didn't. I've thought that we
fixed it now several times, and I was always wrong.
obpainintheass: haven't you anti-debugger-religion folks been claiming
that if you don't have a debugger you're forced to
Also sprach dean gaudet:
} On Wed, 6 Sep 2000, Linus Torvalds wrote:
}
} Yeah. Maybe we fixed truncate, and maybe we didn't. I've thought that we
} fixed it now several times, and I was always wrong.
}
} obpainintheass: haven't you anti-debugger-religion folks been claiming
} that if you
On Thu, 7 Sep 2000, Bill Wendling wrote:
Also sprach dean gaudet:
} On Wed, 6 Sep 2000, Linus Torvalds wrote:
}
} Yeah. Maybe we fixed truncate, and maybe we didn't. I've thought that we
} fixed it now several times, and I was always wrong.
}
} obpainintheass: haven't you
Also sprach dean gaudet:
} On Thu, 7 Sep 2000, Bill Wendling wrote:
} Don't be stupid.
}
} dude, i gave at least three hints that i was joking up there. stupid
} would be if i claimed that it was obvious that a debugger would have
} helped this situation. instead all i'm claiming is that it's
Hi,
Here is another set of output from ksymoops as advised.
Thanks,
Sheldon.
ksymoops 2.3.4 on i686 2.4.0-test8. Options used
-V (default)
-k /proc/ksyms (default)
-l /proc/modules (default)
-o /lib/modules/2.4.0-test8/ (default)
-m /boot/System.map-2.4.0-test8
Yeah. Maybe we fixed truncate, and maybe we didn't. I've thought that we
fixed it now several times, and I was always wrong. Time for some reverse
phychology:
I'm sure this one doesn't fix the truncate bug either.
But I have this ugly feeling that I'm coming down with the same flu that
Yeah. Maybe we fixed truncate, and maybe we didn't. I've thought that we
fixed it now several times, and I was always wrong. Time for some reverse
phychology:
I'm sure this one doesn't fix the truncate bug either.
But I have this ugly feeling that I'm coming down with the same flu that
20 matches
Mail list logo
