Re: Linux 2.2.18 almost...

2000-12-11 Thread Alan Cox
> root=/dev/nfs ip=both ether=0,0,eth0 gives this result > > Dec 10 22:50:52 Eddys dhcpd: DHCPDISCOVER from 00:50:ba:05:7b:fb via eth0 > Dec 10 22:50:52 Eddys dhcpd: DHCPOFFER on 192.168.50.2 to 00:50:ba:05:7b:fb > via eth0 Those are DHCP. 'both' is the old keywords for rarp and bootp. It no

Re: Linux 2.2.18 almost...

2000-12-11 Thread Luca Montecchiani
> did we lose ip=autoconf. I see dhcp and arp transmitting infinitely. I was > able to boot only after completely entering nfsroot= and ip= boot commands. > > 2.2.17 worked thusley. : I didn't try with 2.2.18 yet but looking at the source (ipconfig.c) seem that my patch wasn't accepted, you can

Re: Linux 2.2.18 almost...

2000-12-11 Thread Eddy
did we lose ip=autoconf. I see dhcp and arp transmitting infinitely. I was able to boot only after completely entering nfsroot= and ip= boot commands. 2.2.17 worked thusley. root=/dev/nfs ether=0,0,eth0 2.2.18-pre26 works only root=/dev/nfs nfsroot=192.168.50.11:/tftpboot/191.168.50.2,rsize=81

Re: Linux 2.2.18 almost...

2000-12-10 Thread Alan Cox
> http://www.moses.uklinux.net/patches/dontdiff > > the old one contained vmlinux.lds which would is good for kdb kernels > where vmlinux.lds is automatically generated at runtime. vmlinux.lds for 2.2 is dynamically generated. I should probably have used your dontdiff ;) - To unsubscribe from th

Re: Linux 2.2.18 almost...

2000-12-10 Thread Vasil Kolev
On Sat, 9 Dec 2000, Alan Cox wrote: > The patch I intend to be 2.2.18 is out as 2.2.18pre26 in the usual place. > I'll move it over tomorrow if nobody reports any horrors, missing files etc > Will ftp://ftp.us.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/andrea/patches/v2.2/2.2.18pre25/VM-global-2.2.18p

Re: Linux 2.2.18 almost...

2000-12-10 Thread Tigran Aivazian
actually, if you do have a mention of vmlinux.lds in the actual patch then I can't see how vmlinux.lds in dontdiff could have caused it? But it needed updating (for this very reason) anyway... On Sun, 10 Dec 2000, Tigran Aivazian wrote: > my fault, my fault! Sorry, dontdiff updated on > > http

Re: Linux 2.2.18 almost...

2000-12-10 Thread Tigran Aivazian
my fault, my fault! Sorry, dontdiff updated on http://www.moses.uklinux.net/patches/dontdiff the old one contained vmlinux.lds which would is good for kdb kernels where vmlinux.lds is automatically generated at runtime. Regards, Tigran On Sat, 9 Dec 2000, Michael Rothwell wrote: > Alan Cox

Re: Linux 2.2.18 almost...

2000-12-09 Thread Alan Cox
> > The patch I intend to be 2.2.18 is out as 2.2.18pre26 in the usual place. > > I'll move it over tomorrow if nobody reports any horrors, missing files etc > > Fresh 2.2.17, "patch -p1 < /pre-patch-2.2.18-26" > > can't find file to patch at input line 38909 > Perhaps you used the wrong -p or -

Re: Linux 2.2.18 almost...

2000-12-09 Thread Andre Hedrick
On Sat, 9 Dec 2000, Michael Rothwell wrote: > Alan Cox wrote: > > > > The patch I intend to be 2.2.18 is out as 2.2.18pre26 in the usual place. > > I'll move it over tomorrow if nobody reports any horrors, missing files etc > > > Fresh 2.2.17, "patch -p1 < /pre-patch-2.2.18-26" > > can't find

Re: Linux 2.2.18 almost...

2000-12-09 Thread Keith Owens
On Sat, 09 Dec 2000 18:32:56 -0500, Michael Rothwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Alan Cox wrote: >> The patch I intend to be 2.2.18 is out as 2.2.18pre26 in the usual place. >> I'll move it over tomorrow if nobody reports any horrors, missing files etc > >Fresh 2.2.17, "patch -p1 < /pre-patch-2.2

Re: Linux 2.2.18 almost...

2000-12-09 Thread Eyal Lebedinsky
On Sat, Dec 09, 2000 at 11:00:41PM +, Alan Cox wrote: > The patch I intend to be 2.2.18 is out as 2.2.18pre26 in the usual place. > I'll move it over tomorrow if nobody reports any horrors, missing files etc The text leading up to this was: -- |diff -u --new-file --re

Re: Linux 2.2.18 almost...

2000-12-09 Thread Michael Rothwell
Alan Cox wrote: > > The patch I intend to be 2.2.18 is out as 2.2.18pre26 in the usual place. > I'll move it over tomorrow if nobody reports any horrors, missing files etc Fresh 2.2.17, "patch -p1 < /pre-patch-2.2.18-26" can't find file to patch at input line 38909 Perhaps you used the wrong -

Re: Linux 2.2.18 almost...

2000-12-09 Thread Tom Rini
On Sat, Dec 09, 2000 at 11:00:41PM +, Alan Cox wrote: > The patch I intend to be 2.2.18 is out as 2.2.18pre26 in the usual place. > I'll move it over tomorrow if nobody reports any horrors, missing files etc I haven't checked anywhere yet, but is there a changelog someplace? -- Tom Rini (T

Linux 2.2.18 almost...

2000-12-09 Thread Alan Cox
The patch I intend to be 2.2.18 is out as 2.2.18pre26 in the usual place. I'll move it over tomorrow if nobody reports any horrors, missing files etc - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http