Ok this is the first block of changes before we merge the VM stuff. This is
mostly the bits left over from the 2.2.18 port that were deferred as too
risky near the end of a prerelease set and some bug swats
2.2.19pre1
o Basic page aging(Neil Schemenauer)
On Fri, Dec 15, 2000 at 07:51:04PM +, Alan Cox wrote:
> Ok this is the first block of changes before we merge the VM stuff. This is
> mostly the bits left over from the 2.2.18 port that were deferred as too
> risky near the end of a prerelease set and some bug swats
I believe Brad Douglas h
On Fri, Dec 15, 2000 at 07:51:04PM +, Alan Cox wrote:
> o Basic page aging(Neil Schemenauer)
> | This is a beginning to trying to get the VM right
(page aging isn't a matter of correctness of the VM, it's only a matter of
performance basically only du
> > o Basic page aging(Neil Schemenauer)
> > | This is a beginning to trying to get the VM right
>
> (page aging isn't a matter of correctness of the VM, it's only a matter of
> performance basically only during swap [for all other usages lru behaviour is
> e
On Sat, Dec 16, 2000 at 04:19:47PM +, Alan Cox wrote:
> extremely important. And getting it in early to find out how it behaves was
> done because its hard to predict right now.
Did you got any feedback yet? I believe it shouldn't make much difference
because it's a very light aging, but as y
For the Nth time I have been asked so I will has you the Nth++ time.
Patch or wait..
Nobody is to comment against this thread, this is an Alan & Andre issue.
Cheers,
Andre Hedrick
CTO Timpanogas Research Group
EVP Linux Development, TRG
Linux ATA Development
-
To unsubscribe from this
Hi,
I have linux 2.2.19pre1 and have compiled the cpuid as a module. The
kernel will oops if the cpuid module isn't loaded and one does
/cat/dev/cpu/0/cpuid or /cat/dev/cpu/1/cpuid.
Question: Is it possible to update the ksymoops utility to a
newer version vs. the one sup
Alan Cox wrote:
> Ok this is the first block of changes before we merge the VM stuff. This is
> mostly the bits left over from the 2.2.18 port that were deferred as too
> risky near the end of a prerelease set and some bug swats
Here's the procfs patch again... :) Because the 2.2.18 procfs api i
On Mon, 18 Dec 2000 10:35:58 -0500 (EST),
M Sweger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Question: Is it possible to update the ksymoops utility to a
> newer version vs. the one supplied which is v0.6?
Read the warning message. ksymoops is separate from the kernel after 2.2.
WARNING: This v
Alan Cox wrote:
> Ok this is the first block of changes before we merge the VM stuff. This is
> mostly the bits left over from the 2.2.18 port that were deferred as too
> risky near the end of a prerelease set and some bug swats
And here is the 64-bit printk patch -- a backport of the 2.4.0 code
Heh. Mangleage. :)
Willy Tarreau wrote:
>
> Hello Michael, I wonder about this patch which only fixes an Id/author but no
> code. It may be perfectly normal, but could also come from a mangled file in
> one of your trees. Just for info anyway...
>
> Cheers,
> Willy
>
> > diff -r -u -x CVS -x
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2000 15:56:38 -0500 (EST)
From: Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: M Sweger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: linux 2.2.19pre1 oops on cpuid (fwd)
> How would I activate the usb-serial in such a way as
Hello Michael, I wonder about this patch which only fixes an Id/author but no
code. It may be perfectly normal, but could also come from a mangled file in
one of your trees. Just for info anyway...
Cheers,
Willy
> diff -r -u -x CVS -x *.o linux-2.2.18pre25-VIRGIN/fs/proc/openpromfs.c
zinux/fs/p
27;ve had poweroff problems.
Presently, I'm running linux 2.2.19pre1 and am playing around with
the configurations to see what will work. I listed my comments below
in ITEM A-C. Eventually, I did find a combination that worked at powering
off the Dell but it wasn't what I thought sh
14 matches
Mail list logo
