Re: Linux 2.4.2-ac12

2001-03-06 Thread God
On Tue, 6 Mar 2001, Alan Cox wrote: > > I have not had problems with 2.4.2, just tried 2.4.2-ac12. About the IDE > > stage it just reboots. > > Does ac11 also reboot like that. -ac is currently testing versions of the new > VIA IDE driver so knowing if the latest update did that would be very

Re: Linux 2.4.2-ac12

2001-03-06 Thread God
On Tue, 6 Mar 2001, Scott M. Hoffman wrote: > On Tue, 6 Mar 2001, God wrote: > > > # iostat > > Linux 2.4.2 (scotch)03/06/2001 > > I have not had problems with 2.4.2, just tried 2.4.2-ac12. About the IDE > stage it just reboots. Same chipset/mb? > As for your iostat output, which ver

Re: Linux 2.4.2-ac12

2001-03-06 Thread Andre Hedrick
On Tue, 6 Mar 2001, Alan Cox wrote: > > Just trying 2.4.3-pre2 now. It appears to be working fine. I used the > > same config from my ac11-12 attempts. My systems problem with ac11-12 must > > not be something common between them. Hope this helps. > > It helps a lot. I now know not to submit

Re: Linux 2.4.2-ac12

2001-03-06 Thread Alan Cox
> Just trying 2.4.3-pre2 now. It appears to be working fine. I used the > same config from my ac11-12 attempts. My systems problem with ac11-12 must > not be something common between them. Hope this helps. It helps a lot. I now know not to submit the VIA ide driver to Linus until further inves

Re: Linux 2.4.2-ac12

2001-03-06 Thread Scott M. Hoffman
On Mon, 5 Mar 2001, Linus Torvalds wrote: > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > Scott M. Hoffman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > It may not be related, but out of five boot attempts, only one got past > >the IDE driver stage(ie, below from 2.4.2 : > > VP_IDE: IDE controller on PCI bus 00 dev 39

Re: Linux 2.4.2-ac12, ac11 no good either

2001-03-06 Thread Scott M. Hoffman
On Tue, 6 Mar 2001, Alan Cox wrote: > > I have not had problems with 2.4.2, just tried 2.4.2-ac12. About the IDE > > stage it just reboots. > > Does ac11 also reboot like that. -ac is currently testing versions of the new > VIA IDE driver so knowing if the latest update did that would be very >

Re: Linux 2.4.2-ac12

2001-03-06 Thread Wayne Whitney
In mailing-lists.linux-kernel, you wrote: > -ac is currently testing versions of the new VIA IDE driver What is the relationship between the version 3.21 in -ac12 and the version 4.3 that was distributed on this list a week or two ago? Cheers, Wayne - To unsubscribe from this list: send the l

Re: Linux 2.4.2-ac12

2001-03-06 Thread Alan Cox
> I won't be able to try ac11 until late tonight as that is my home PC that > has the VIA chips. I'll let you know > Also, these patches should be applied to 2.4.2, right? I'm using a 2.4.1 > tree patched to 2.4.2, then applied ac12. Yep you applied it right by the sounds of it. - To unsubscri

Re: Linux 2.4.2-ac12

2001-03-06 Thread Scott M. Hoffman
On Tue, 6 Mar 2001, Alan Cox wrote: > > I have not had problems with 2.4.2, just tried 2.4.2-ac12. About the IDE > > stage it just reboots. > > Does ac11 also reboot like that. -ac is currently testing versions of the new > VIA IDE driver so knowing if the latest update did that would be very

Re: Linux 2.4.2-ac12

2001-03-06 Thread Alan Cox
> I have not had problems with 2.4.2, just tried 2.4.2-ac12. About the IDE > stage it just reboots. Does ac11 also reboot like that. -ac is currently testing versions of the new VIA IDE driver so knowing if the latest update did that would be very useful - To unsubscribe from this list: send

Re: Linux 2.4.2-ac12

2001-03-06 Thread Scott M. Hoffman
On Tue, 6 Mar 2001, God wrote: > On Mon, 5 Mar 2001, Scott M. Hoffman wrote: > > > On Mon, 5 Mar 2001, Richard B. Johnson wrote: > > > > > > I -- S T R O N G L Y -- suggest that nobody use this kernel with > > > a BusLogic SCSI controller until this problem is fixed. > > > > > > Dick Johnson >

Re: Linux 2.4.2-ac12

2001-03-06 Thread God
On Mon, 5 Mar 2001, Scott M. Hoffman wrote: > On Mon, 5 Mar 2001, Richard B. Johnson wrote: > > > > I -- S T R O N G L Y -- suggest that nobody use this kernel with > > a BusLogic SCSI controller until this problem is fixed. > > > > Dick Johnson > > It may not be related, but out of five boot

Re: Linux 2.4.2-ac12

2001-03-05 Thread Linus Torvalds
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Scott M. Hoffman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > It may not be related, but out of five boot attempts, only one got past >the IDE driver stage(ie, below from 2.4.2 : > VP_IDE: IDE controller on PCI bus 00 dev 39 > VP_IDE: chipset revision 16 > VP_IDE: not 100% nat

Re: Linux 2.4.2-ac12

2001-03-05 Thread Scott M. Hoffman
On Mon, 5 Mar 2001, Richard B. Johnson wrote: > > Attempts to run linux-2.4.3-pre2 on chaos.analogic.com results > in **MASSIVE** file-system destruction. I have (had) all SCSI > disks, using the BusLogic controller. > > There is something **MAJOR** going on BAD, BAD, BAD, even disks > that were n