> > 2.4.3-ac8
> > o ACPI updates(Andrew Grover)
>
> Patch for ac9 generates a file named linux/acpi-20010413.diff. It partially
> applies, some hunks failed and some offset. Is this rest of your work ?
Oops my screwup. I applied it, it wouldnt build. I
> intervals after I use my CD burner, but that just might be coincidental. But
> I'd like to point out that I've never seen this on my VIA686a itself. The P3
> machine is UP too, not SMP. I saw this ever since I switched the machine to
> 2.4.2-ac8 and beyond (previously 2.2.18).
At the moment
On Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 10:26:26PM -0400, Byron Stanoszek wrote:
> I've seen this on my Dell P3 700 machine several times. Seems to happen at odd
> intervals after I use my CD burner, but that just might be coincidental. But
I have seen this related to the cd burner as well. it's not a via board
On 04.18 Alan Cox wrote:
>
> 2.4.3-ac9
..
> 2.4.3-ac8
> o ACPI updates(Andrew Grover)
Patch for ac9 generates a file named linux/acpi-20010413.diff. It partially
applies, some hunks failed and some offset. Is this rest of your work ?
--
J.A. Magallon
On 04.18 Alan Cox wrote:
2.4.3-ac9
..
2.4.3-ac8
o ACPI updates(Andrew Grover)
Patch for ac9 generates a file named linux/acpi-20010413.diff. It partially
applies, some hunks failed and some offset. Is this rest of your work ?
--
J.A. Magallon
On Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 10:26:26PM -0400, Byron Stanoszek wrote:
I've seen this on my Dell P3 700 machine several times. Seems to happen at odd
intervals after I use my CD burner, but that just might be coincidental. But
I have seen this related to the cd burner as well. it's not a via board
intervals after I use my CD burner, but that just might be coincidental. But
I'd like to point out that I've never seen this on my VIA686a itself. The P3
machine is UP too, not SMP. I saw this ever since I switched the machine to
2.4.2-ac8 and beyond (previously 2.2.18).
At the moment the
2.4.3-ac8
o ACPI updates(Andrew Grover)
Patch for ac9 generates a file named linux/acpi-20010413.diff. It partially
applies, some hunks failed and some offset. Is this rest of your work ?
Oops my screwup. I applied it, it wouldnt build. I removed it
This particular motherboard is an ASUS CUV4X-DLS, the chipset is a
VIA694XDP, the IDE chipset however is a VIA686b.
I've seen this in all the kernels I've tried with the "ac" patches.
Any kernel I've tried that are NOT SMP work fine.
On Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 10:26:26PM -0400, Byron Stanoszek
On Wed, 18 Apr 2001, Jason Thomas wrote:
> Alan,
>
> This does not seem to fix the problem with "clock timer", which
> repeatedly prints the following message:
>
> probable hardware bug: clock timer configuration lost - probably a VIA686a
>motherboard.
> probable hardware bug: restoring chip
Alan,
This does not seem to fix the problem with "clock timer", which
repeatedly prints the following message:
probable hardware bug: clock timer configuration lost - probably a VIA686a motherboard.
probable hardware bug: restoring chip configuration.
The machine does not get any further than
On Wed, 18 Apr 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/alan/2.4/
There is no ac9 patch on ftp.kernel.org. Did you put it there?
---
Sergey Kubushin Sr. Unix Administrator
CyberBills, Inc.Phone: 702-567-8857
874
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/alan/2.4/
Intermediate diffs are available from
http://www.bzimage.org
VIA users should test this kernel carefully. It has what are supposed to be
the right fixes for the VIA hardware bugs. Obviously
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/alan/2.4/
Intermediate diffs are available from
http://www.bzimage.org
VIA users should test this kernel carefully. It has what are supposed to be
the right fixes for the VIA hardware bugs. Obviously
On Wed, 18 Apr 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/alan/2.4/
There is no ac9 patch on ftp.kernel.org. Did you put it there?
---
Sergey Kubushin Sr. Unix Administrator
CyberBills, Inc.Phone: 702-567-8857
874
Alan,
This does not seem to fix the problem with "clock timer", which
repeatedly prints the following message:
probable hardware bug: clock timer configuration lost - probably a VIA686a motherboard.
probable hardware bug: restoring chip configuration.
The machine does not get any further than
On Wed, 18 Apr 2001, Jason Thomas wrote:
Alan,
This does not seem to fix the problem with "clock timer", which
repeatedly prints the following message:
probable hardware bug: clock timer configuration lost - probably a VIA686a
motherboard.
probable hardware bug: restoring chip
This particular motherboard is an ASUS CUV4X-DLS, the chipset is a
VIA694XDP, the IDE chipset however is a VIA686b.
I've seen this in all the kernels I've tried with the "ac" patches.
Any kernel I've tried that are NOT SMP work fine.
On Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 10:26:26PM -0400, Byron Stanoszek
18 matches
Mail list logo
