Re: Linux 2.4.4-ac10: Oops -> 2.4.4

2001-05-18 Thread Alan Cox
> Anyway, the bug is in 2.4.4, not in 2.4.4-ac10: I am really sorry for > having loosing your time. With 2.4.4-ac9 with my fdomain, everything is > also working great ;-) Great. [Crosses another bug off] Alan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the

Re: Linux 2.4.4-ac10: Oops -> 2.4.4

2001-05-18 Thread FAVRE Gregoire
Thus spake Alan Cox ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > Can you boot a kernel without fdomain.c compiled in next Yes, but I am too stupid: there were a faillure in my patch-2.4.4-ac10.bz2, which is 0 bits so I have bunzip -c patch-2.4.4-ac10.bz2|patch -p1 -s with an empty file :-(( That mean I compiled

Re: Linux 2.4.4-ac10: Oops - 2.4.4

2001-05-18 Thread FAVRE Gregoire
Thus spake Alan Cox ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): Can you boot a kernel without fdomain.c compiled in next Yes, but I am too stupid: there were a faillure in my patch-2.4.4-ac10.bz2, which is 0 bits so I have bunzip -c patch-2.4.4-ac10.bz2|patch -p1 -s with an empty file :-(( That mean I compiled

Re: Linux 2.4.4-ac10: Oops - 2.4.4

2001-05-18 Thread Alan Cox
Anyway, the bug is in 2.4.4, not in 2.4.4-ac10: I am really sorry for having loosing your time. With 2.4.4-ac9 with my fdomain, everything is also working great ;-) Great. [Crosses another bug off] Alan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of