Just to alert potential readers, that the bug is now discussed there :
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8143
Eric Lacombe
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.ke
Hello,
I've just triggered the bug again but _now_ without the nvidia proprietary
module. Unfortunately, I hadn't enable the DEBUG options yet.
Nevertheless, It seems that the bug was triggered when the NAS was going to
awake and that 2 user applications wanted to access it during his awakening
Eric Lacombe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
[...]
> Also, if you have some new ideas about the problem or what I could try to
> trigger it more frequently (I already wake up the NAS as more as I can, but
> maybe I could write a script to do that), I would be thankful.
You can add more DEBUG options for s
Hello,
Sorry for the long time without giving new information about the problem/bug,
but I wasn't able to trigger it since now.
Well, this time, my system freeze on a 2.6.20.1.
I try to use the magic sysrq (which works fine when my system is running), but
nothing happen (unraw, reboot, etc.).
On Tuesday 13 February 2007 21:30:47 Francois Romieu wrote:
> Eric Lacombe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
> [...]
>
> > That problem also remind me that when I compiled this driver without
> > the "CONFIG_NET_ETHERNET" (in the section "Ethernet (10 or 100Mbit)"), I
> > have really poor performance with the
Eric Lacombe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
[...]
> That problem also remind me that when I compiled this driver without
> the "CONFIG_NET_ETHERNET" (in the section "Ethernet (10 or 100Mbit)"), I have
> really poor performance with the net device. Maybe it is related, or not ;)
>
> If it gives you more i
First of all, thank you for your answer.
On Wednesday 31 January 2007 04:51:35 Steven French wrote:
> The cifs entries in the dmesg log do not indicate any errors, much less
> show the cause of this
> particular problem.
ok.
>
> The repeated entry:
> CIFS VFS: Send error in SETFSUnixInfo
The cifs entries in the dmesg log do not indicate any errors, much less
show the cause of this
particular problem.
The repeated entry:
CIFS VFS: Send error in SETFSUnixInfo = -5
is expected on connection to certain older versions of Samba servers (or
other servers that
only partially su
8 matches
Mail list logo
