On Mon, 25 Dec 2006, Florin Iucha wrote:
> I left the machine to run the diff and when I came back, the USB
> keyboard was unresponsive although the USB mice plugged in the hub built
> into the keyboard were working fine. I was able to ssh into the box,
> capture the dmesg and reboot. Everyth
On Wed, Dec 27, 2006 at 12:42:53AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Florin Iucha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I saw your subsequent message and will apply the patch, retest and
> > report.
>
> yeah. Just to make sure i've attached the latest and greatest version of
> the patch - please make sure
Hi.
Can you confirm that the problem I mentioned in
http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/12/24/32 is the same?
Best regards,
Fabio
On 12/26/06, Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
* Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I've had at least one more occurrence of it:
> >
> > [ 78.804940] BUG:
On Tue, 26 Dec 2006 18:15:31 +0100 Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > some days and will let you know if the problem represents. Please note
> > that it happened only twice and I don't have any clue on how to
> > reproduce it.
> >
> > I added Pavel and Rafael to CC-list because for the first time i
Hi
On 12/26/06, Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi!
> some days and will let you know if the problem represents. Please note
> that it happened only twice and I don't have any clue on how to
> reproduce it.
>
> I added Pavel and Rafael to CC-list because for the first time in at
> least
Hi!
> some days and will let you know if the problem represents. Please note
> that it happened only twice and I don't have any clue on how to
> reproduce it.
>
> I added Pavel and Rafael to CC-list because for the first time in at
> least six months my laptop failed to resume after suspend-to-di
* Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I've had at least one more occurrence of it:
> >
> > [ 78.804940] BUG: scheduling while atomic: kbd/0x2000/3444
> > [ 78.804944]
> > [ 78.804945] Call Trace:
>
> ok, i can think of a simpler scenario:
> add_preempt_count(PREEMPT_ACTIVE) /
* Randy Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've had at least one more occurrence of it:
>
> [ 78.804940] BUG: scheduling while atomic: kbd/0x2000/3444
> [ 78.804944]
> [ 78.804945] Call Trace:
ok, i can think of a simpler scenario: add_preempt_count(PREEMPT_ACTIVE)
/twice/, nested
On Tue, 26 Dec 2006 13:40:19 +0100 Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > [ 2844.871895] BUG: scheduling while atomic: cp/0x2000/2965
>
> > This is the second report we've had where bit 29 of ->preempt_count is
> > getting set. I don't think there's any
* Florin Iucha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is my year-old workstation that I've build from good parts (Asus
> A8N-SLI premium, OCZ memory), not overclocked, not overheated (it is
> in a Antec P180 case with 12 cm fans -> CPU max is 43'C when not used
> for my hour-long simulations). I w
On Tue, Dec 26, 2006 at 01:40:19PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > [ 2844.871895] BUG: scheduling while atomic: cp/0x2000/2965
>
> > This is the second report we've had where bit 29 of ->preempt_count is
> > getting set. I don't think there'
* Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > [ 2844.871895] BUG: scheduling while atomic: cp/0x2000/2965
> This is the second report we've had where bit 29 of ->preempt_count is
> getting set. I don't think there's any legitimate way in which that
> bit can get set. (Ingo?)
It's not l
On Mon, 25 Dec 2006 16:56:16 -0600
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Florin Iucha) wrote:
> > The dmesg from the client machine is attached.
>
> Now, really.
>
> BTW, I am using NFSv4 exported async from the server and mounted
> without any extra options on the client.
>
> florin
>
> --
> Bruce Schneier exp
On Tue, Dec 26, 2006 at 12:06:58AM +0100, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-12-25 at 16:56 -0600, Florin Iucha wrote:
> > BTW, I am using NFSv4 exported async from the server and mounted
> > without any extra options on the client.
>
> Doesn't look like it has much to do with NFS. The Oopses a
On Mon, 2006-12-25 at 16:56 -0600, Florin Iucha wrote:
> > The dmesg from the client machine is attached.
>
> Now, really.
>
> BTW, I am using NFSv4 exported async from the server and mounted
> without any extra options on the client.
>
> florin
Doesn't look like it has much to do with NFS. The
I've got an oops or two while copying 60 Gb of files over NFS then
comparing them using diff. The client is AMD64 running Debian
testing/unstable with the shinny new 2.6.20-rc2 kernel. The server is
Debian testing with 2.6.18-3 distribution kernel. The source
filesystem is ext3.
I left the mach
> The dmesg from the client machine is attached.
Now, really.
BTW, I am using NFSv4 exported async from the server and mounted
without any extra options on the client.
florin
--
Bruce Schneier expects the Spanish Inquisition.
http://geekz.co.uk/schneierfacts/fact/163
[ 2844.871895] BUG:
Hi!
> Rafael J. Wysocki (1):
> ACPI: S4: Use "platform" rather than "shutdown" mode by default
...platform is right thing to do, but it is also "more aggresive" than
"shutdown" -- it needs bigger chunk of ACPI BIOS to work properly.
So, it would be nice to test 2.6.20-rc2 on your favourite
On Mon, 25 Dec 2006, Mark Glines wrote:
> Mark Glines wrote:
> > Hmm. I'm trying to build 2.6.20-rc2 on a little powerpc box with
> > arch/powerpc/configs/linkstation_defconfig, and I get:
> ...
> > MODPOST vmlinux
> > ln: accessing `arch/powerpc/boot/zImage': No such file or directory
> > make
Mark Glines wrote:
Hmm. I'm trying to build 2.6.20-rc2 on a little powerpc box with
arch/powerpc/configs/linkstation_defconfig, and I get:
...
MODPOST vmlinux
ln: accessing `arch/powerpc/boot/zImage': No such file or directory
make[1]: *** [arch/powerpc/boot/zImage] Error 1
make: *** [zImage
OK, I applied your patch to yesterday's Linus' GIT. I will run it for
some days and will let you know if the problem represents. Please note
that it happened only twice and I don't have any clue on how to
reproduce it.
I added Pavel and Rafael to CC-list because for the first time in at
least six
Linus Torvalds wrote:
(much of the latter syntactic cleanups). And arm and powerpc updates.
Hmm. I'm trying to build 2.6.20-rc2 on a little powerpc box with
arch/powerpc/configs/linkstation_defconfig, and I get:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/src/linux $ make zImage
HOSTCC scripts/basic/fixdep
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Index: linux-2.6.20-rc2/drivers/macintosh/via-pmu-backlight.c
=======
--- linux-2.6.20-rc2.orig/drivers/macintosh/via-pmu-backlight.c 2006-11-30
23:33:39.00000 +0100
+++ linux-2.6.20-rc2/drivers
"Fabio Comolli" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Just found this in syslog. It was during normal activity, about 6
> minutes after resume-from-ram. I never saw this before.
It seems someone missed to check PREEMPT_ACTIVE in __resched_legal().
Could you please test the following patch?
--
OGAWA Hiro
Alessandro Suardi wrote:
On 12/24/06, Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ok,
it's a couple of days delayed, because we've been trying to figure out
what is up with the rtorrent hash failures since 2.6.18.3. I don't think
we've made any progress, but we've cleaned up a number of suspects
On 12/24/06, Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ok,
it's a couple of days delayed, because we've been trying to figure out
what is up with the rtorrent hash failures since 2.6.18.3. I don't think
we've made any progress, but we've cleaned up a number of suspects in the
meantime.
It's a
s
Clean up and make try_to_free_buffers() not race with dirty pages
VM: Remove "clear_page_dirty()" and "test_clear_page_dirty()" functions
Clean up and export cancel_dirty_page() to modules
Fix reiserfs after "test_clear_page_dirty()" removal
27 matches
Mail list logo
