Re: Linux 2.6.21: pmtmr losing time

2007-05-14 Thread Joerg Sommrey
On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 09:36:24AM +0200, Joerg Sommrey wrote: > On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 11:38:34PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > On Mon, 2007-04-30 at 18:39 +0200, Joerg Sommrey wrote: > > > Here it is. Maybe this problem is related to the usage of the > > > "experimental" amd76x_pm module?

Re: Linux 2.6.21: pmtmr losing time

2007-05-14 Thread Joerg Sommrey
On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 09:36:24AM +0200, Joerg Sommrey wrote: On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 11:38:34PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: On Mon, 2007-04-30 at 18:39 +0200, Joerg Sommrey wrote: Here it is. Maybe this problem is related to the usage of the experimental amd76x_pm module? Can

Re: Linux 2.6.21: pmtmr losing time

2007-05-01 Thread Joerg Sommrey
On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 11:38:34PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Mon, 2007-04-30 at 18:39 +0200, Joerg Sommrey wrote: > > Here it is. Maybe this problem is related to the usage of the > > "experimental" amd76x_pm module? > > Can you please verify what happens w/o that module ? > After

Re: Linux 2.6.21: pmtmr losing time

2007-05-01 Thread Joerg Sommrey
On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 11:38:34PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: On Mon, 2007-04-30 at 18:39 +0200, Joerg Sommrey wrote: Here it is. Maybe this problem is related to the usage of the experimental amd76x_pm module? Can you please verify what happens w/o that module ? After rebooting the

Re: Linux 2.6.21: pmtmr losing time

2007-04-30 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Mon, 2007-04-30 at 18:39 +0200, Joerg Sommrey wrote: > Here it is. Maybe this problem is related to the usage of the > "experimental" amd76x_pm module? Can you please verify what happens w/o that module ? Thanks, tglx - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe

Re: Linux 2.6.21: pmtmr losing time

2007-04-30 Thread Joerg Sommrey
On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 06:23:36PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Mon, 2007-04-30 at 14:52 +0200, Joerg Sommrey wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > after switching to 2.6.21 the system clock sporadically loses time on my > > box (i386, Athlon MP). > > It's always around 4.68 seconds and happened 7

Re: Linux 2.6.21: pmtmr losing time

2007-04-30 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Mon, 2007-04-30 at 14:52 +0200, Joerg Sommrey wrote: > Hi all, > > after switching to 2.6.21 the system clock sporadically loses time on my > box (i386, Athlon MP). > It's always around 4.68 seconds and happened 7 times in the last 12 > hours. A simple calculation (2 ^ ACPI_PM_MASK /

Linux 2.6.21: pmtmr losing time

2007-04-30 Thread Joerg Sommrey
Hi all, after switching to 2.6.21 the system clock sporadically loses time on my box (i386, Athlon MP). It's always around 4.68 seconds and happened 7 times in the last 12 hours. A simple calculation (2 ^ ACPI_PM_MASK / PMTMR_TICKS_PER_SEC = 2 ^ 24 / 3579545 = 4.686968875) shows: There is almost

Linux 2.6.21: pmtmr losing time

2007-04-30 Thread Joerg Sommrey
Hi all, after switching to 2.6.21 the system clock sporadically loses time on my box (i386, Athlon MP). It's always around 4.68 seconds and happened 7 times in the last 12 hours. A simple calculation (2 ^ ACPI_PM_MASK / PMTMR_TICKS_PER_SEC = 2 ^ 24 / 3579545 = 4.686968875) shows: There is almost

Re: Linux 2.6.21: pmtmr losing time

2007-04-30 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Mon, 2007-04-30 at 14:52 +0200, Joerg Sommrey wrote: Hi all, after switching to 2.6.21 the system clock sporadically loses time on my box (i386, Athlon MP). It's always around 4.68 seconds and happened 7 times in the last 12 hours. A simple calculation (2 ^ ACPI_PM_MASK /

Re: Linux 2.6.21: pmtmr losing time

2007-04-30 Thread Joerg Sommrey
On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 06:23:36PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: On Mon, 2007-04-30 at 14:52 +0200, Joerg Sommrey wrote: Hi all, after switching to 2.6.21 the system clock sporadically loses time on my box (i386, Athlon MP). It's always around 4.68 seconds and happened 7 times in the

Re: Linux 2.6.21: pmtmr losing time

2007-04-30 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Mon, 2007-04-30 at 18:39 +0200, Joerg Sommrey wrote: Here it is. Maybe this problem is related to the usage of the experimental amd76x_pm module? Can you please verify what happens w/o that module ? Thanks, tglx - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe