Hi,
There are a few patches for regressions that was not merged yet.
Subject : 8250 claims non existing device blocking IO port
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/8/18/20
Last known good : ?
Submitter : Andrey Borzenkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Caused-By : ?
Handled-By
Hi,
There are a few patches for regressions that was not merged yet.
Subject : 8250 claims non existing device blocking IO port
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/8/18/20
Last known good : ?
Submitter : Andrey Borzenkov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Caused-By : ?
Handled-By
Hi Again;
04 Eyl 2007 Sal tarihinde, S.Çağlar Onur şunları yazmıştı:
> Hi;
>
> 01 Eyl 2007 Cts tarihinde, Linus Torvalds şunları yazmıştı:
> > So have fun, give it a go, and expect a quiet week next week.
>
> After upgrading -rc5 (i'm currently using linus's latest git + appArmor and
>
On the day of Sunday 02 September 2007 Prakash Punnoor hast written:
> Hi,
>
> 2.6.23-rc5 locks up hard (Magic Syskeys won't even work) after a few
> minutes of work on x86_64. 2.6.23-rc4 was fine. I'll try git-bisect to find
> out what is causing trouble. Yes, I am using nvidia binary but it
Hi;
01 Eyl 2007 Cts tarihinde, Linus Torvalds şunları yazmıştı:
> So have fun, give it a go, and expect a quiet week next week.
After upgrading -rc5 (i'm currently using linus's latest git + appArmor and
bootsplash patchset) my CD/DVD-ROM suddenly disappeared :).
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ diff
On Sun, Sep 02, 2007 at 11:40:17AM -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
Hello,
> can you give us an lspci -vvxx of the system when it's in this "bad"
> state? We have a very vague suspicion on something like this, the lspci
> would help us a lot (this is a really rare thing that we can't really
>
On Sun, Sep 02, 2007 at 11:40:17AM -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
Hello,
can you give us an lspci -vvxx of the system when it's in this bad
state? We have a very vague suspicion on something like this, the lspci
would help us a lot (this is a really rare thing that we can't really
reproduce,
Hi;
01 Eyl 2007 Cts tarihinde, Linus Torvalds şunları yazmıştı:
So have fun, give it a go, and expect a quiet week next week.
After upgrading -rc5 (i'm currently using linus's latest git + appArmor and
bootsplash patchset) my CD/DVD-ROM suddenly disappeared :).
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ diff -u
On the day of Sunday 02 September 2007 Prakash Punnoor hast written:
Hi,
2.6.23-rc5 locks up hard (Magic Syskeys won't even work) after a few
minutes of work on x86_64. 2.6.23-rc4 was fine. I'll try git-bisect to find
out what is causing trouble. Yes, I am using nvidia binary but it didn't
Hi Again;
04 Eyl 2007 Sal tarihinde, S.Çağlar Onur şunları yazmıştı:
Hi;
01 Eyl 2007 Cts tarihinde, Linus Torvalds şunları yazmıştı:
So have fun, give it a go, and expect a quiet week next week.
After upgrading -rc5 (i'm currently using linus's latest git + appArmor and
bootsplash
Alessandro Suardi wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> This one has bitten many of us :)
>
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/9/2/219
Thx , I didn't saw that patch.
Gabriel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info
On 9/3/07, Gabriel C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Sunday, 2 September 2007 09:54, Prakash Punnoor wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> 2.6.23-rc5 locks up hard (Magic Syskeys won't even work) after a few
> >> minutes
> >> of work on x86_64. 2.6.23-rc4 was fine. I'll try
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Sunday, 2 September 2007 09:54, Prakash Punnoor wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> 2.6.23-rc5 locks up hard (Magic Syskeys won't even work) after a few minutes
>> of work on x86_64. 2.6.23-rc4 was fine. I'll try git-bisect to find out what
>> is causing trouble. Yes, I am using
[Zilvinas Valinskas - Mon, Sep 03, 2007 at 02:11:51PM +0300]
| Jeff was not swearing at all. All he said and meant that you did provide
| fix faster then he was able to ;) Slight culture differences at play. ;)
|
|
| > >
| > >
| > > heh, you beat me to it. That should indeed fix it.
| > >
| >
[Zilvinas Valinskas - Mon, Sep 03, 2007 at 02:11:51PM +0300]
| Jeff was not swearing at all. All he said and meant that you did provide
| fix faster then he was able to ;) Slight culture differences at play. ;)
|
|
|
|
| heh, you beat me to it. That should indeed fix it.
|
| Jeff
|
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Sunday, 2 September 2007 09:54, Prakash Punnoor wrote:
Hi,
2.6.23-rc5 locks up hard (Magic Syskeys won't even work) after a few minutes
of work on x86_64. 2.6.23-rc4 was fine. I'll try git-bisect to find out what
is causing trouble. Yes, I am using nvidia binary
On 9/3/07, Gabriel C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Sunday, 2 September 2007 09:54, Prakash Punnoor wrote:
Hi,
2.6.23-rc5 locks up hard (Magic Syskeys won't even work) after a few
minutes
of work on x86_64. 2.6.23-rc4 was fine. I'll try git-bisect to find out
Alessandro Suardi wrote:
[snip]
This one has bitten many of us :)
http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/9/2/219
Thx , I didn't saw that patch.
Gabriel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at
Hi,
Same problem here, lspci output attached, I can also pm you a lshw output.
Arjan van de Ven wrote:
On Sun, 2 Sep 2007 19:40:38 +0200
Christian Leber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
I have observed some oddness in the powersaving behavior in rc5 and
the rcs before and i suspect this
On Sun, 2 Sep 2007 19:40:38 +0200
Christian Leber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have observed some oddness in the powersaving behavior in rc5 and
> the rcs before and i suspect this may be scheduler related.
>
> After booting or resuming from drisk or ram(!) the wakeups are about
>
Hello,
I have observed some oddness in the powersaving behavior in rc5 and the
rcs before and i suspect this may be scheduler related.
After booting or resuming from drisk or ram(!) the wakeups are about
45 per second (about 1% C0 (cpu runng)) and after
about half an hour to hours of doing
On Sunday, 2 September 2007 09:54, Prakash Punnoor wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 2.6.23-rc5 locks up hard (Magic Syskeys won't even work) after a few minutes
> of work on x86_64. 2.6.23-rc4 was fine. I'll try git-bisect to find out what
> is causing trouble. Yes, I am using nvidia binary but it didn't make
On Sunday, 2 September 2007 09:54, Prakash Punnoor wrote:
Hi,
2.6.23-rc5 locks up hard (Magic Syskeys won't even work) after a few minutes
of work on x86_64. 2.6.23-rc4 was fine. I'll try git-bisect to find out what
is causing trouble. Yes, I am using nvidia binary but it didn't make
Hello,
I have observed some oddness in the powersaving behavior in rc5 and the
rcs before and i suspect this may be scheduler related.
After booting or resuming from drisk or ram(!) the wakeups are about
45 per second (about 1% C0 (cpu runng)) and after
about half an hour to hours of doing
On Sun, 2 Sep 2007 19:40:38 +0200
Christian Leber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I have observed some oddness in the powersaving behavior in rc5 and
the rcs before and i suspect this may be scheduler related.
After booting or resuming from drisk or ram(!) the wakeups are about
45 per
Hi,
Same problem here, lspci output attached, I can also pm you a lshw output.
Arjan van de Ven wrote:
On Sun, 2 Sep 2007 19:40:38 +0200
Christian Leber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I have observed some oddness in the powersaving behavior in rc5 and
the rcs before and i suspect this
[Jeff Garzik - Sat, Sep 01, 2007 at 06:32:27AM -0400]
> Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
>> test this, does it help?
>> Cyrill
>> ---
>> diff --git a/drivers/ata/ata_piix.c b/drivers/ata/ata_piix.c
>> index e40c94f..8031697 100644
>> --- a/drivers/ata/ata_piix.c
>> +++ b/drivers/ata/ata_piix.c
Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
test this, does it help?
Cyrill
---
diff --git a/drivers/ata/ata_piix.c b/drivers/ata/ata_piix.c
index e40c94f..8031697 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/ata_piix.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/ata_piix.c
@@ -1187,6 +1187,7 @@ static void piix_iocfg_bit18_quirk(struct
Grant Wilson wrote:
Get an oops when booting this kernel:
[...]
Using git-bisect the faulty commit is
bad: [43a98f05d99205687ddf74089e79a8312c8c5f90] ata_piix: implement IOCFG bit18
quirk
Good work bisecting! I love git-bisect :)
The attached patch should fix things, let me know if it
[Grant Wilson - Sat, Sep 01, 2007 at 10:11:10AM +0100]
| On Fri, 31 Aug 2007 23:52:36 -0700 (PDT)
| Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
|
| >
| > I'm making ready to leave for the kernel summit (as are probably a
| > lot of other core kernel people), and as part of that, there's a
| >
On Fri, 31 Aug 2007 23:52:36 -0700 (PDT)
Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm making ready to leave for the kernel summit (as are probably a
> lot of other core kernel people), and as part of that, there's a
> 2.6.23-rc5 out there now.
>
> Hopefully we've addressed most
figs
Linus Torvalds (3):
Do not use the ia64 clocksource on non-ia64 architectures
x86: be even more careful about checking the stack frame on dumping
Linux 2.6.23-rc5
Lucas Nussbaum (1):
[NET_SCHED] sch_prio.c: remove duplicate call of tc_classify()
Mariusz Kozlowski (1):
):
Do not use the ia64 clocksource on non-ia64 architectures
x86: be even more careful about checking the stack frame on dumping
Linux 2.6.23-rc5
Lucas Nussbaum (1):
[NET_SCHED] sch_prio.c: remove duplicate call of tc_classify()
Mariusz Kozlowski (1):
Input: gscps2
On Fri, 31 Aug 2007 23:52:36 -0700 (PDT)
Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm making ready to leave for the kernel summit (as are probably a
lot of other core kernel people), and as part of that, there's a
2.6.23-rc5 out there now.
Hopefully we've addressed most regressions, so
[Grant Wilson - Sat, Sep 01, 2007 at 10:11:10AM +0100]
| On Fri, 31 Aug 2007 23:52:36 -0700 (PDT)
| Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
|
|
| I'm making ready to leave for the kernel summit (as are probably a
| lot of other core kernel people), and as part of that, there's a
| 2.6.23-rc5
Grant Wilson wrote:
Get an oops when booting this kernel:
[...]
Using git-bisect the faulty commit is
bad: [43a98f05d99205687ddf74089e79a8312c8c5f90] ata_piix: implement IOCFG bit18
quirk
Good work bisecting! I love git-bisect :)
The attached patch should fix things, let me know if it
Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
test this, does it help?
Cyrill
---
diff --git a/drivers/ata/ata_piix.c b/drivers/ata/ata_piix.c
index e40c94f..8031697 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/ata_piix.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/ata_piix.c
@@ -1187,6 +1187,7 @@ static void piix_iocfg_bit18_quirk(struct
[Jeff Garzik - Sat, Sep 01, 2007 at 06:32:27AM -0400]
Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
test this, does it help?
Cyrill
---
diff --git a/drivers/ata/ata_piix.c b/drivers/ata/ata_piix.c
index e40c94f..8031697 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/ata_piix.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/ata_piix.c
@@ -1187,6
38 matches
Mail list logo
