--- Kay Sievers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Greg,
> it seems that:
> arch/x86/pci/legacy.c :: pci_legacy_init()
>
> tries to create already created "bridge" symlinks in 2.6.24. So we
> discover the same devices twice? Can this be a reason for the hang?
No, it can't be because it's *not* hangin
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 9:47 AM, Kay Sievers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Feb 18, 2008 9:06 PM, Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 19:42:25 + (GMT)
> > Chris Rankin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > --- Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
On Feb 18, 2008 9:06 PM, Stephen Hemminger
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 19:42:25 + (GMT)
> Chris Rankin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > --- Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > sysfs: duplicate filename 'bridge' can not be created
> > > > > WARNING: at fs/
On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 19:42:25 + (GMT)
Chris Rankin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > sysfs: duplicate filename 'bridge' can not be created
> > > > WARNING: at fs/sysfs/dir.c:424 sysfs_add_one()
> > > > Pid: 1, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.24.
--- Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > sysfs: duplicate filename 'bridge' can not be created
> > > WARNING: at fs/sysfs/dir.c:424 sysfs_add_one()
> > > Pid: 1, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.24.1 #1
> > > [] show_trace_log_lvl+0x1a/0x2f
> > > [] show_trace+0x12/0x14
> > > [] dump_
On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 05:00:49 -0800
Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Feb 2008 00:54:08 + (GMT) Chris Rankin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > [Try this again, except this time I'll force the attachment as inline text!]
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have managed to boot 2.6.24.
--- Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > sysfs: duplicate filename 'bridge' can not be created
> > WARNING: at fs/sysfs/dir.c:424 sysfs_add_one()
> > Pid: 1, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.24.1 #1
> > [] show_trace_log_lvl+0x1a/0x2f
> > [] show_trace+0x12/0x14
> > [] dump_stack+0x6c/0x72
--- Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> and here it hangs, I assume?
Oops, I think you have misunderstood. The hang happens if I *don't* specify
acpi=noirq, whereas in
this case I did. I have already reported the original hang under threads:
http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0
On Sun, 17 Feb 2008 00:54:08 + (GMT) Chris Rankin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [Try this again, except this time I'll force the attachment as inline text!]
>
> Hi,
>
> I have managed to boot 2.6.24.1 on this machine, with the NMI watchdog
> enabled, by using the
> "acpi=noirq" option. (Ther
On Sun, 17 Feb 2008 00:54:08 + (GMT) Chris Rankin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [Try this again, except this time I'll force the attachment as inline text!]
>
> Hi,
>
> I have managed to boot 2.6.24.1 on this machine, with the NMI watchdog
> enabled, by using the
> "acpi=noirq" option. (Ther
[Try this again, except this time I'll force the attachment as inline text!]
Hi,
I have managed to boot 2.6.24.1 on this machine, with the NMI watchdog enabled,
by using the
"acpi=noirq" option. (There does seem to be some unhappiness with bridge
symlinks in sysfs,
though.)
Cheers,
Chris
Linu
Sent from Yahoo! Mail - a smarter inbox http://uk.mail.yahoo.com
LINUX-2.6.24.1
Description: 1531392240-LINUX-2.6.24.1
--- Oliver Pinter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> here is the snapshots in patch format:
> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/snapshots
Thanks, they're very pretty. But what exactly are they patches *between*?
Cheers,
Chris
___
Hi!
here is the snapshots in patch format:
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/snapshots
On 2/9/08, Chris Rankin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Does any older kernel version work? 2.6.23? Newer ones?
> Everything up to and including 2.6.23.11 work
--- Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does any older kernel version work? 2.6.23? Newer ones?
Everything up to and including 2.6.23.11 works fine. I never tried
2.6.23.{12,13,14,15}, but I
expect they're fine too.
> 2.6.24-git15?
No idea. This box isn't really set up to use git. Anyway, I w
On Sat, Feb 09, 2008 at 12:06:06PM +, Chris Rankin wrote:
> --- Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 11:31:24PM +, Chris Rankin wrote:
> > > I've just tried booting the 2.6.24.1 kernel, except without
> > > nmi_watchdog being enabled. It looks like there are IRQ
--- Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 11:31:24PM +, Chris Rankin wrote:
> > I've just tried booting the 2.6.24.1 kernel, except without
> > nmi_watchdog being enabled. It looks like there are IRQs still not
> > being enabled.
>
> Does 2.6.24 work? Is this a 2.6.24.
On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 11:31:24PM +, Chris Rankin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've just tried booting the 2.6.24.1 kernel, except without
> nmi_watchdog being enabled. It looks like there are IRQs still not
> being enabled.
Does 2.6.24 work? Is this a 2.6.24.1 regression?
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsu
Hi,
I've just tried booting the 2.6.24.1 kernel, except without nmi_watchdog being
enabled. It looks
like there are IRQs still not being enabled.
Cheers,
Chris
Linux version 2.6.24.1 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 4.1.2 20070925 (Red Hat
4.1.2-33))
#1 SMP PREEMPT Fri Feb 8 22:41:10 GMT 2008
On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 05:13:08PM -0500, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> On 02/08/2008 04:00 PM, Oliver Pinter wrote:
> >
> > the v2.6.24.y tree is not published or not visible with git-web on
> > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-2.6.24.y.git;a=summary
> > address
> >
>
> And,
>
>
On 02/08/2008 04:00 PM, Oliver Pinter wrote:
>
> the v2.6.24.y tree is not published or not visible with git-web on
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-2.6.24.y.git;a=summary
> address
>
And,
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git
is missing
ok, it's works
On 2/8/08, Oliver Pinter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ok, the git pull methon worked with the begin, but the gitweb not, ok,
> than in a 30 min I checked
>
> On 2/8/08, Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 10:00:56PM +0100, Oliver Pinter wrote:
> > > Hi!
>
ok, the git pull methon worked with the begin, but the gitweb not, ok,
than in a 30 min I checked
On 2/8/08, Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 10:00:56PM +0100, Oliver Pinter wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > the v2.6.24.y tree is not published or not visible with git-web on
> >
>
On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 10:00:56PM +0100, Oliver Pinter wrote:
> Hi!
>
> the v2.6.24.y tree is not published or not visible with git-web on
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-2.6.24.y.git;a=summary
> address
Hm, that was odd, Chris created that tree in a different way than
n
drm: the drm really should call pci_set_master..
>
> Ed Beroset (1):
> USB: ftdi driver - add support for optical probe device
>
> Franco Lanza (1):
> USB: ftdi-sio: Patch to add vendor/device id for ATK_16IC CCD
>
> Grant Grundler (1):
> USB:
tical probe device
Franco Lanza (1):
USB: ftdi-sio: Patch to add vendor/device id for ATK_16IC CCD
Grant Grundler (1):
USB: storage: Add unusual_dev for HP r707
Greg Kroah-Hartman (2):
USB: handle idVendor of 0x
Linux 2.6.24.1
Ian Abbott (1):
PCI: Fix fakephp dea
26 matches
Mail list logo
