* Paul Walmsley [130605 21:22]:
> Hi,
>
> also,
>
> On Wed, 5 Jun 2013, Aida Mynzhasova wrote:
>
> > Aida Mynzhasova (5):
> > ARM: OMAP: AM33xx: multiple renames for early initialization
>
> If this patch is what's responsible for all the file renaming, please drop
> it. Looks from the
On 06.06.2013 07:54, Paul Walmsley wrote:
здравствуйте,
On Wed, 5 Jun 2013, Aida Mynzhasova wrote:
Not so long ago I tried to boot Linux 3.10-rc4 kernel on DM816x EVM
board. Unfortunately, my attempts were failed by reason of poor
support of DM81xx-based devices in new kernels.
Yeah, TI
On 06.06.2013 07:54, Paul Walmsley wrote:
здравствуйте,
On Wed, 5 Jun 2013, Aida Mynzhasova wrote:
Not so long ago I tried to boot Linux 3.10-rc4 kernel on DM816x EVM
board. Unfortunately, my attempts were failed by reason of poor
support of DM81xx-based devices in new kernels.
Yeah, TI
* Paul Walmsley p...@pwsan.com [130605 21:22]:
Hi,
also,
On Wed, 5 Jun 2013, Aida Mynzhasova wrote:
Aida Mynzhasova (5):
ARM: OMAP: AM33xx: multiple renames for early initialization
If this patch is what's responsible for all the file renaming, please drop
it. Looks from the
Hi,
also,
On Wed, 5 Jun 2013, Aida Mynzhasova wrote:
> Aida Mynzhasova (5):
> ARM: OMAP: AM33xx: multiple renames for early initialization
If this patch is what's responsible for all the file renaming, please drop
it. Looks from the change summary that it's just useless churn (although
I
здравствуйте,
On Wed, 5 Jun 2013, Aida Mynzhasova wrote:
> Not so long ago I tried to boot Linux 3.10-rc4 kernel on DM816x EVM
> board. Unfortunately, my attempts were failed by reason of poor
> support of DM81xx-based devices in new kernels.
Yeah, TI pretty much gave up on tryi
Not so long ago I tried to boot Linux 3.10-rc4 kernel on DM816x EVM
board. Unfortunately, my attempts were failed by reason of poor
support of DM81xx-based devices in new kernels.
Actually, on Linux 3.10-rc4 kernel early initialization of board
is failed when it tries to initialize power domains
Not so long ago I tried to boot Linux 3.10-rc4 kernel on DM816x EVM
board. Unfortunately, my attempts were failed by reason of poor
support of DM81xx-based devices in new kernels.
Actually, on Linux 3.10-rc4 kernel early initialization of board
is failed when it tries to initialize power domains
Not so long ago I tried to boot Linux 3.10-rc4 kernel on DM816x EVM
board. Unfortunately, my attempts were failed by reason of poor
support of DM81xx-based devices in new kernels.
Actually, on Linux 3.10-rc4 kernel early initialization of board
is failed when it tries to initialize power domains
Not so long ago I tried to boot Linux 3.10-rc4 kernel on DM816x EVM
board. Unfortunately, my attempts were failed by reason of poor
support of DM81xx-based devices in new kernels.
Actually, on Linux 3.10-rc4 kernel early initialization of board
is failed when it tries to initialize power domains
здравствуйте,
On Wed, 5 Jun 2013, Aida Mynzhasova wrote:
Not so long ago I tried to boot Linux 3.10-rc4 kernel on DM816x EVM
board. Unfortunately, my attempts were failed by reason of poor
support of DM81xx-based devices in new kernels.
Yeah, TI pretty much gave up on trying to get support
Hi,
also,
On Wed, 5 Jun 2013, Aida Mynzhasova wrote:
Aida Mynzhasova (5):
ARM: OMAP: AM33xx: multiple renames for early initialization
If this patch is what's responsible for all the file renaming, please drop
it. Looks from the change summary that it's just useless churn (although
I
On Mon, 3 Jun 2013, Mikael Pettersson wrote:
> Randy Dunlap writes:
> >
> > I still use tarballs and patches, fwiw.
>
> As do I. For this one time the lack of a patch file is no big deal, but
> please don't discontinue them permanently.
The tar-ball is now there, courtesy of Konstantin. No
Randy Dunlap writes:
> On 06/02/13 01:45, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> >
> > Another week, another -rc. But this time (at least for now) only as a git
> > tree - for people actually using the tar-balls and patches, I apologize,
> > but I'm a complete moron, and didn't install kup, its perl
Randy Dunlap writes:
On 06/02/13 01:45, Linus Torvalds wrote:
Another week, another -rc. But this time (at least for now) only as a git
tree - for people actually using the tar-balls and patches, I apologize,
but I'm a complete moron, and didn't install kup, its perl dependencies,
On Mon, 3 Jun 2013, Mikael Pettersson wrote:
Randy Dunlap writes:
I still use tarballs and patches, fwiw.
As do I. For this one time the lack of a patch file is no big deal, but
please don't discontinue them permanently.
The tar-ball is now there, courtesy of Konstantin. No
On 06/02/13 01:45, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> Another week, another -rc. But this time (at least for now) only as a git
> tree - for people actually using the tar-balls and patches, I apologize,
> but I'm a complete moron, and didn't install kup, its perl dependencies,
> and my kup release
Another week, another -rc. But this time (at least for now) only as a git
tree - for people actually using the tar-balls and patches, I apologize,
but I'm a complete moron, and didn't install kup, its perl dependencies,
and my kup release scripts on the pixel before the trip.
And while I can
Another week, another -rc. But this time (at least for now) only as a git
tree - for people actually using the tar-balls and patches, I apologize,
but I'm a complete moron, and didn't install kup, its perl dependencies,
and my kup release scripts on the pixel before the trip.
And while I can
On 06/02/13 01:45, Linus Torvalds wrote:
Another week, another -rc. But this time (at least for now) only as a git
tree - for people actually using the tar-balls and patches, I apologize,
but I'm a complete moron, and didn't install kup, its perl dependencies,
and my kup release scripts
20 matches
Mail list logo
