Andy Lutomirski writes:
> On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 7:23 AM, Eric W. Biederman
> wrote:
>> ebied...@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) writes:
>>
>>> Andy Lutomirski writes:
Hi Eric-
This is rather odd. The selftest
(tools/testing/selftests/capabilities/test_execve), run a
On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 7:23 AM, Eric W. Biederman
wrote:
> ebied...@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) writes:
>
>> Andy Lutomirski writes:
>>>
>>> Hi Eric-
>>>
>>> This is rather odd. The selftest
>>> (tools/testing/selftests/capabilities/test_execve), run as root, fails
>>> on current kernels.
ebied...@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) writes:
> Andy Lutomirski writes:
>>
>> Hi Eric-
>>
>> This is rather odd. The selftest
>> (tools/testing/selftests/capabilities/test_execve), run as root, fails
>> on current kernels. The failure is worked around by this:
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/testi
Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 02:10:32PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
>>>>>> selftest capabilities test failed on linux mainline and linux-next and
>>>>>> PASS on linux-4.4.70+
>>>>>
>>>>> Odd. Any chance you can use 'git bisect'
Kamboju wrote:
>>>>> selftest capabilities test failed on linux mainline and linux-next and
>>>>> PASS on linux-4.4.70+
>>>>
>>>> Odd. Any chance you can use 'git bisect' to track down the offending
>>>> commit?
>>&
ux mainline and linux-next and
>>>> PASS on linux-4.4.70+
>>>
>>> Odd. Any chance you can use 'git bisect' to track down the offending
>>> commit?
>>>
>>> Does this also fail on x86 or any other platform you have available?
>&
On 06/27/2017 09:16 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 05:13:59PM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 02:10:32PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
>>> selftest capabilities test failed on linux mainline and linux-next and
>>> PASS on linux-4.4.70+
>
On 06/28/2017 12:16 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 05:13:59PM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 02:10:32PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
>>> selftest capabilities test failed on linux mainline and linux-next and
>>> PASS on linux-4.4.70+
>
On 06/27/2017 09:32 AM, Shuah Khan wrote:
> Hi Naresh,
>
> On 06/27/2017 02:40 AM, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
>> selftest capabilities test failed on linux mainline and linux-next and
>> PASS on linux-4.4.70+
>> Tested on HiKey ARM64 Development board.
>>
>>
Hi Naresh,
On 06/27/2017 02:40 AM, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> selftest capabilities test failed on linux mainline and linux-next and
> PASS on linux-4.4.70+
> Tested on HiKey ARM64 Development board.
>
> A bug reported in Linaro bug tracking system,
> LKFT: Capabilities test
On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 02:10:32PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> selftest capabilities test failed on linux mainline and linux-next and
> PASS on linux-4.4.70+
Odd. Any chance you can use 'git bisect' to track down the offending
commit?
Does this also fail on x86 or any other p
On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 05:13:59PM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 02:10:32PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> > selftest capabilities test failed on linux mainline and linux-next and
> > PASS on linux-4.4.70+
>
> Odd. Any chance you can use 'git bisect&#x
selftest capabilities test failed on linux mainline and linux-next and
PASS on linux-4.4.70+
Tested on HiKey ARM64 Development board.
A bug reported in Linaro bug tracking system,
LKFT: Capabilities test_execve fail Wrong effective state AT_SECURE is not set
https://bugs.linaro.org/show_bug.cgi
diff --git a/Documentation/arm64/tagged-pointers.txt
b/Documentation/arm64/tagged-pointers.txt
index d9995f1f51b3..a25a99e82bb1 100644
--- a/Documentation/arm64/tagged-pointers.txt
+++ b/Documentation/arm64/tagged-pointers.txt
@@ -11,24 +11,56 @@ in AArch64 Linux.
The kernel configures the transl
an (1):
pid_ns: Sleep in TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE in zap_pid_ns_processes
Greg Kroah-Hartman (1):
Linux 4.4.70
J. Bruce Fields (1):
nfsd: encoders mustn't use unitialized values in error cases
Jaegeuk Kim (1):
f2fs: check entire encrypted bigname when finding a dentry
Jame
15 matches
Mail list logo
