Hi all,
Am 09.02.19 um 20:42 schrieb Paul Bolle:
> Linus Torvalds schreef op zo 06-01-2019 om 18:14 [-0800]:
>> Nothing particular stands out, although I do like
>> seeing how some ancient drivers are getting put out to pasture
>> (*cought*isdn*cough*).
>
> Just to let people know: the gigaset dr
Linus Torvalds schreef op zo 06-01-2019 om 18:14 [-0800]:
> Nothing particular stands out, although I do like
> seeing how some ancient drivers are getting put out to pasture
> (*cought*isdn*cough*).
Just to let people know: the gigaset drivers will get my palliative care until
a few weeks before
On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 08:26:13AM -0500, Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 04:02:03PM +0800, Guo Ren wrote:
> > Can I take back this pull request and send a new pull request with
> > https:// URLs ?
>
> It's not necessary at this point, as the pull request has already been
> p
On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 04:02:03PM +0800, Guo Ren wrote:
> Can I take back this pull request and send a new pull request with
> https:// URLs ?
It's not necessary at this point, as the pull request has already been
processed. However, your future emails should have the public URL of the
git reposi
On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 03:59:22AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 12:11 AM Guo Ren wrote:
> >
> > This pull-request is wrong on the patch:
> > "csky: fixup module relocation error with 807 & 860".
> > diff --git a/arch/csky/kernel/module.c b/arch/csky/kernel/module.c
> > -
On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 12:22:46PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 9:11 AM Guo Ren wrote:
> >
> > Sorry Linus,
> >
> > This pull-request is wrong on the patch:
> > "csky: fixup module relocation error with 807 & 860".
> > diff --git a/arch/csky/kernel/module.c b/arch/csky/ker
On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 12:11 AM Guo Ren wrote:
>
> This pull-request is wrong on the patch:
> "csky: fixup module relocation error with 807 & 860".
> diff --git a/arch/csky/kernel/module.c b/arch/csky/kernel/module.c
> - uint16_t location_tmp = (uint16_t *)location;
> + uint16_t *loca
On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 9:11 AM Guo Ren wrote:
>
> Sorry Linus,
>
> This pull-request is wrong on the patch:
> "csky: fixup module relocation error with 807 & 860".
> diff --git a/arch/csky/kernel/module.c b/arch/csky/kernel/module.c
> - uint16_t location_tmp = (uint16_t *)location;
> +
;
Please drop it if possible and I'll send another [GIT PULL].
Best Regards
Guo Ren
On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 10:49:57PM +0800, guo...@kernel.org wrote:
> The following changes since commit bfeffd155283772bbe78c6a05dec7c0128ee500c:
>
> Linux 5.0-rc1 (2019-01-06 17:08:20 -0800)
&
Can I take back this pull request and send a new pull request with
https:// URLs ?
On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 01:29:55PM -0500, Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 06:05:01PM +, pr-tracker-...@kernel.org wrote:
> > The pull request you sent on Wed, 9 Jan 2019 22:49:57 +0800:
>
The copyright owner can rescind. Those saying you cannot are wrong.
Explained. In american vernacular:
Video: http://www.veoh.com/watch/v141917696RbH96XaD
https://openload.co/f/mT_AH3xmIUM/TruthAboutLinuxandGPLv2__.mp4
Audio: http://ufile.io/sdhpl
If you hit a video about a speedrunner: th
On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 10:40:20AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Side note: I do wish people would use the proper _public_ access.
I'm wondering if this largely happens due to people's insteadOf rules.
We've established that git-request-pull will quietly substitute URLs in
the emails it generates
On Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at 10:30 AM Konstantin Ryabitsev
wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 06:05:01PM +, pr-tracker-...@kernel.org wrote:
> > The pull request you sent on Wed, 9 Jan 2019 22:49:57 +0800:
> >
> > > (unable to parse the git remote)
>
> I just committed a fix for this. We weren't ex
On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 06:05:01PM +, pr-tracker-...@kernel.org wrote:
> The pull request you sent on Wed, 9 Jan 2019 22:49:57 +0800:
>
> > (unable to parse the git remote)
I just committed a fix for this. We weren't expecting URLs without ://
in them.
-K
The pull request you sent on Wed, 9 Jan 2019 22:49:57 +0800:
> (unable to parse the git remote)
has been merged into torvalds/linux.git:
https://git.kernel.org/torvalds/c/4064e47c82810586975b4304b105056389beaa06
Thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.wiki.kernel.org/userdoc/prt
The following changes since commit bfeffd155283772bbe78c6a05dec7c0128ee500c:
Linux 5.0-rc1 (2019-01-06 17:08:20 -0800)
are available in the git repository at:
g...@github.com:c-sky/csky-linux.git tags/csky-for-linus-5.0-rc1
for you to fetch changes up to
On Wed 09-01-19 00:16:59, Guo Ren wrote:
> Thx Michal,
>
> On Tue, Jan 08, 2019 at 04:40:31PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Tue 08-01-19 17:51:07, Guo Ren wrote:
> > [...]
> > > static inline pte_t *pte_alloc_one_kernel(struct mm_struct *mm)
> > > {
> > > pte_t *pte;
> > > unsigned long i;
Thx Michal,
On Tue, Jan 08, 2019 at 04:40:31PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Tue 08-01-19 17:51:07, Guo Ren wrote:
> [...]
> > static inline pte_t *pte_alloc_one_kernel(struct mm_struct *mm)
> > {
> > pte_t *pte;
> > unsigned long i;
> >
> > pte = (pte_t *) __get_free_page(GFP_KERNE
On Tue 08-01-19 17:51:07, Guo Ren wrote:
[...]
> static inline pte_t *pte_alloc_one_kernel(struct mm_struct *mm)
> {
> pte_t *pte;
> unsigned long i;
>
> pte = (pte_t *) __get_free_page(GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL);
>^^
Hi Linus,
On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 03:21:45PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 11:26 AM Guenter Roeck wrote:
> >
> > Bisect points to commit 4cf58924951ef ("mm: treewide: remove unused address
> > argument from pte_alloc functions"). Interesting - wasn't that supposed
> > to be
On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 11:26 AM Guenter Roeck wrote:
>
> Bisect points to commit 4cf58924951ef ("mm: treewide: remove unused address
> argument from pte_alloc functions"). Interesting - wasn't that supposed
> to be automatic ?
>
> csky does use the the removed address argument, so I won't even try
On Sun, Jan 06, 2019 at 06:14:15PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> So this was a fairly unusual merge window with the holidays, and as a
> result I'm not even going to complain about the pull requests that
> ended up coming in late. It all mostly worked out fine, I think. And
> lot of people got the
On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 11:40:08AM +, David Binderman wrote:
>
> Hello there,
>
> linux-5.0-rc1/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/hal/hal8188e_rate_adaptive.c:412]:
> (style) Expression is always false because 'else if' condition matches
> previous condition at l
On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 11:40:08AM +, David Binderman wrote:
>
> Hello there,
>
> linux-5.0-rc1/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/hal/hal8188e_rate_adaptive.c:412]:
> (style) Expression is always false because 'else if' condition matches
> previous condition at l
Hi all,
As usual, the executive friendly graph is at
http://neuling.org/linux-next-size.html :-)
(No merge commits counted, next-20181224 was the last linux-next before
the merge window opened.)
Commits in v5.0-rc1 (relative to v4.20): 10843
Commits in next-20181224:
So this was a fairly unusual merge window with the holidays, and as a
result I'm not even going to complain about the pull requests that
ended up coming in late. It all mostly worked out fine, I think. And
lot of people got their pull requests in early, and hopefully had a
calm holiday season. Than
26 matches
Mail list logo
