On Wed 09-01-19 00:16:59, Guo Ren wrote:
> Thx Michal,
>
> On Tue, Jan 08, 2019 at 04:40:31PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Tue 08-01-19 17:51:07, Guo Ren wrote:
> > [...]
> > > static inline pte_t *pte_alloc_one_kernel(struct mm_struct *mm)
> > > {
> > > pte_t *pte;
> > > unsigned long i;
Thx Michal,
On Tue, Jan 08, 2019 at 04:40:31PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Tue 08-01-19 17:51:07, Guo Ren wrote:
> [...]
> > static inline pte_t *pte_alloc_one_kernel(struct mm_struct *mm)
> > {
> > pte_t *pte;
> > unsigned long i;
> >
> > pte = (pte_t *) __get_free_page(GFP_KERNE
On Tue 08-01-19 17:51:07, Guo Ren wrote:
[...]
> static inline pte_t *pte_alloc_one_kernel(struct mm_struct *mm)
> {
> pte_t *pte;
> unsigned long i;
>
> pte = (pte_t *) __get_free_page(GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL);
>^^
Hi Linus,
On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 03:21:45PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 11:26 AM Guenter Roeck wrote:
> >
> > Bisect points to commit 4cf58924951ef ("mm: treewide: remove unused address
> > argument from pte_alloc functions"). Interesting - wasn't that supposed
> > to be
On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 11:26 AM Guenter Roeck wrote:
>
> Bisect points to commit 4cf58924951ef ("mm: treewide: remove unused address
> argument from pte_alloc functions"). Interesting - wasn't that supposed
> to be automatic ?
>
> csky does use the the removed address argument, so I won't even try
On Sun, Jan 06, 2019 at 06:14:15PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> So this was a fairly unusual merge window with the holidays, and as a
> result I'm not even going to complain about the pull requests that
> ended up coming in late. It all mostly worked out fine, I think. And
> lot of people got the
6 matches
Mail list logo
