s" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, January 29, 2001 20:18
Subject: Re: Linux Disk Performance/File IO per process
> On Mon, 29 Jan 2001, List User wrote:
>
> > Just wa
On Mon, 29 Jan 2001, List User wrote:
> Just wanted to 'chime' in here. Yes this would be noisy and will have
> an affect on system performance however these statistics are what are
> used in conjunction with several others to size systems as well as to
> plan on growth. If Linux is to be put i
ssage -
From: "Chris Evans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, January 29, 2001 07:26
Subject: RE: Linux Disk Performance/File IO per process
&g
On Mon, 29 Jan 2001, Szabolcs Szakacsits wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Jan 2001, Chris Evans wrote:
>
> > Stephen Tweedie has a rather funky i/o stats enhancement patch which
> > should provide what you need. It comes with RedHat7.0 and gives decent
> > disk statistics in /proc/partitions.
>
> Monitoring
On Mon, 29 Jan 2001, Chris Evans wrote:
> Stephen Tweedie has a rather funky i/o stats enhancement patch which
> should provide what you need. It comes with RedHat7.0 and gives decent
> disk statistics in /proc/partitions.
Monitoring via /proc [not just IO but close to anything] has the
feature
On Mon, 29 Jan 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Thanks to both Jens and Chris - this provides the information I need to
> obtain our busy rate
> It's unfortunate that the kernel needs to be patched to provide this
> information - hopefully it will become part of the kernel soon.
>
> I had a respo
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Evans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, 29 January 2001 13:04
> To: Tony Young
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Linux Disk Performance/File IO per process
>
>
>
&
On Mon, 29 Jan 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> All,
>
> I work for a company that develops a systems and performance management
> product for Unix (as well as PC and TANDEM) called PROGNOSIS. Currently we
> support AIX, HP, Solaris, UnixWare, IRIX, and Linux.
>
> I've hit a bit of a wall trying
On Mon, Jan 29 2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> All,
>
> I work for a company that develops a systems and performance management
> product for Unix (as well as PC and TANDEM) called PROGNOSIS. Currently we
> support AIX, HP, Solaris, UnixWare, IRIX, and Linux.
>
> I've hit a bit of a wall trying
All,
I work for a company that develops a systems and performance management
product for Unix (as well as PC and TANDEM) called PROGNOSIS. Currently we
support AIX, HP, Solaris, UnixWare, IRIX, and Linux.
I've hit a bit of a wall trying to expand the data provided by our Linux
solution - I can't
10 matches
Mail list logo
