> "CN" == Carlos Narváez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
CN> - IP Forwarding has been enabled on the router via "echo 1 >
CN> /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward"
Try cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/*/forwarding. If any of them are 0,
then echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/all/forwarding.
/Benny
-
To
On Sep 22 2007 22:10, ben soo wrote:
>
> i used to add proxy arp's on the router when i had problems like this. Dunno
> if it's the recommended fix, but it worked.
There is certainly no Proxy ARP required here since you do not
do subnet sharing or funny games like that.
>
On Sep 22 2007 22:10, ben soo wrote:
i used to add proxy arp's on the router when i had problems like this. Dunno
if it's the recommended fix, but it worked.
There is certainly no Proxy ARP required here since you do not
do subnet sharing or funny games like that.
CN == Carlos Narváez [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
CN - IP Forwarding has been enabled on the router via echo 1
CN /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
Try cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/*/forwarding. If any of them are 0,
then echo 1 /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/all/forwarding.
/Benny
-
To unsubscribe from
i used to add proxy arp's on the router when i had problems like
this. Dunno if it's the recommended fix, but it worked.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proxy_arp
Carlos Narváez wrote:
This is starting to frustrate me, because it should be much simpler
than it seems to be, and I feel like I'm
* Sat, 22 Sep 2007 18:09:15 -0500
> This is starting to frustrate me, because it should be much simpler
> than it seems to be, and I feel like I'm missing something small and
> obvious.
Please address such questions to any user forum, or to
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> otherwise.
While doing that,
This is starting to frustrate me, because it should be much simpler
than it seems to be, and I feel like I'm missing something small and
obvious.
I have two private networks, we'll say 192.168.254.0/24 and
192.168.251.0/24. And I have a linux box in the middle with addresses
192.168.254.17 and
This is starting to frustrate me, because it should be much simpler
than it seems to be, and I feel like I'm missing something small and
obvious.
I have two private networks, we'll say 192.168.254.0/24 and
192.168.251.0/24. And I have a linux box in the middle with addresses
192.168.254.17 and
* Sat, 22 Sep 2007 18:09:15 -0500
This is starting to frustrate me, because it should be much simpler
than it seems to be, and I feel like I'm missing something small and
obvious.
Please address such questions to any user forum, or to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] otherwise.
While doing that, provide
i used to add proxy arp's on the router when i had problems like
this. Dunno if it's the recommended fix, but it worked.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proxy_arp
Carlos Narváez wrote:
This is starting to frustrate me, because it should be much simpler
than it seems to be, and I feel like I'm
10 matches
Mail list logo
