On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 11:00:48AM +0200, Miroslav Benes wrote:
> > - For binary-based patch generation (kpatch-build), we currently diff
> > objects at a per-compilation-unit level. That would have to be
> > changed to work on vmlinux.o instead.
> >
> > - Objtool would also have to be change
> [ adding CCs ]
>
> On Thu, 25 Apr 2019, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > On IRC, Peter expressed some concern about -flive-patching, specifically
> > that the flag isn't compatible with LTO.
> >
> > The upstream kernel currently doesn't support LTO, but Android is using
> > it with
[ adding CCs ]
On Thu, 25 Apr 2019, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On IRC, Peter expressed some concern about -flive-patching, specifically
> that the flag isn't compatible with LTO.
>
> The upstream kernel currently doesn't support LTO, but Android is using
> it with LLVM:
>
> https://
On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 02:22:23PM -0400, Joe Lawrence wrote:
> On 4/25/19 11:26 AM, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > On IRC, Peter expressed some concern about -flive-patching, specifically
> > that the flag isn't compatible with LTO.
> >
> > The upstream kernel currently doesn't suppor
On 4/25/19 11:26 AM, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
Hi all,
On IRC, Peter expressed some concern about -flive-patching, specifically
that the flag isn't compatible with LTO.
The upstream kernel currently doesn't support LTO, but Android is using
it with LLVM:
https://source.android.com/devices/tech/
Hi all,
On IRC, Peter expressed some concern about -flive-patching, specifically
that the flag isn't compatible with LTO.
The upstream kernel currently doesn't support LTO, but Android is using
it with LLVM:
https://source.android.com/devices/tech/debug/kcfi
And there seems to be progress bei
6 matches
Mail list logo
