On Fri, 2013-03-29 at 16:35 -0700, Paul Turner wrote:
> I'm surprised that patch would have much effect in either direction;
> it changes the amortization of accounting, but not the actual numbers
> -- especially for a persistent load. We'll take a look.
>
Hi Paul,
Wonder if you have a chance t
I'm surprised that patch would have much effect in either direction;
it changes the amortization of accounting, but not the actual numbers
-- especially for a persistent load. We'll take a look.
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 4:20 PM, Tim Chen wrote:
> During our testings of 3.8 kernel, we noticed th
During our testings of 3.8 kernel, we noticed that after the patch
Revert "sched: Update_cfs_shares at period edge" (commit 17bc14b7),
the load between the sockets or larger system can have
large imbalance. For example, for a 4 socket Westmere-EX
(10 cores/socket), we notice the loadings betw
3 matches
Mail list logo
