Antw: Re: Lower bound 0.05 on 15-Minute load?

>>> Martin Steigerwald schrieb am 02.07.2015 um 11:26 in Nachricht <1479160.a5Vb4cJSSF@merkaba>: > On Thursday 02 July 2015 10:50:13 Ulrich Windl wrote: >> Hi! > > Hi Ulrich, > >> I'm not subscribed, so plese CC: me for your replies. >> >> When graphing the CPU load, I noticed that the

Antw: Re: Lower bound 0.05 on 15-Minute load?

Martin Steigerwald mar...@lichtvoll.de schrieb am 02.07.2015 um 11:26 in Nachricht 1479160.a5Vb4cJSSF@merkaba: On Thursday 02 July 2015 10:50:13 Ulrich Windl wrote: Hi! Hi Ulrich, I'm not subscribed, so plese CC: me for your replies. When graphing the CPU load, I noticed that the

Re: Lower bound 0.05 on 15-Minute load?

On Thursday 02 July 2015 10:50:13 Ulrich Windl wrote: > Hi! Hi Ulrich, > I'm not subscribed, so plese CC: me for your replies. > > When graphing the CPU load, I noticed that the 15-minute average never > drops below 0.05, while the 5-minute load and the 1-minute load does > (Kernel

Lower bound 0.05 on 15-Minute load?

Hi! I'm not subscribed, so plese CC: me for your replies. When graphing the CPU load, I noticed that the 15-minute average never drops below 0.05, while the 5-minute load and the 1-minute load does (Kernel 3.0.101-0.47.52-xen of SLES11 on x86_64). Ist that a known bug? Interactive call of

Lower bound 0.05 on 15-Minute load?

Hi! I'm not subscribed, so plese CC: me for your replies. When graphing the CPU load, I noticed that the 15-minute average never drops below 0.05, while the 5-minute load and the 1-minute load does (Kernel 3.0.101-0.47.52-xen of SLES11 on x86_64). Ist that a known bug? Interactive call of

Re: Lower bound 0.05 on 15-Minute load?

On Thursday 02 July 2015 10:50:13 Ulrich Windl wrote: Hi! Hi Ulrich, I'm not subscribed, so plese CC: me for your replies. When graphing the CPU load, I noticed that the 15-minute average never drops below 0.05, while the 5-minute load and the 1-minute load does (Kernel