Re: Lump xxxinit together with init if possible (was Re: Solve section mismatch for free_area_init_core.)

2008-02-23 Thread Alexander van Heukelum
On Sat, 23 Feb 2008 18:53:06 +0100, "Sam Ravnborg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > Hi Alexander. > > I more than less expected people to scream "ugly, ugly!". > > That was my first thought and the reason why it stayed in my inbox > for so long. > But I could not find a better way to do it. We could

Re: Lump xxxinit together with init if possible (was Re: Solve section mismatch for free_area_init_core.)

2008-02-23 Thread Sam Ravnborg
Hi Alexander. > I more than less expected people to scream "ugly, ugly!". That was my first thought and the reason why it stayed in my inbox for so long. But I could not find a better way to do it. We could do it in different ways but not better. > Maybe you could consider the following patch,

Lump xxxinit together with init if possible (was Re: Solve section mismatch for free_area_init_core.)

2008-02-23 Thread Alexander van Heukelum
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 09:30:42AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Mon, 18 Feb 2008, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > > I have (triggered by Geert) spend some time reviewing this patch > > and I see no better way to fix it. > > > > So it gets my: > > > > Reviewed-by: Sam Ravnborg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Lump xxxinit together with init if possible (was Re: Solve section mismatch for free_area_init_core.)

2008-02-23 Thread Alexander van Heukelum
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 09:30:42AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: On Mon, 18 Feb 2008, Sam Ravnborg wrote: I have (triggered by Geert) spend some time reviewing this patch and I see no better way to fix it. So it gets my: Reviewed-by: Sam Ravnborg [EMAIL PROTECTED] Acked-by:

Re: Lump xxxinit together with init if possible (was Re: Solve section mismatch for free_area_init_core.)

2008-02-23 Thread Sam Ravnborg
Hi Alexander. I more than less expected people to scream ugly, ugly!. That was my first thought and the reason why it stayed in my inbox for so long. But I could not find a better way to do it. We could do it in different ways but not better. Maybe you could consider the following patch,

Re: Lump xxxinit together with init if possible (was Re: Solve section mismatch for free_area_init_core.)

2008-02-23 Thread Alexander van Heukelum
On Sat, 23 Feb 2008 18:53:06 +0100, Sam Ravnborg [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Hi Alexander. I more than less expected people to scream ugly, ugly!. That was my first thought and the reason why it stayed in my inbox for so long. But I could not find a better way to do it. We could do it in