Re: [PATCH v10 06/59] PCI: Kill wrong quirk about M7101

2016-04-25 Thread Bjorn Helgaas
0001:00:06.0: quirk: [io 0x7fe01000600-0x7fe0100061f] claimed by > > >> >> ali7101 SMB > > >> >> pci 0001:00:07.0: can't claim BAR 0 [io > > >> >> 0x7fe0100-0x7fe0100]: address conflict with 0001:00:06.0 [io > > >>

[PATCH v11 08/60] PCI: Kill wrong quirk about M7101

2016-04-07 Thread Yinghai Lu
ali7101 ACPI pci 0001:00:06.0: quirk: [io 0x7fe01000600-0x7fe0100061f] claimed by ali7101 SMB pci 0001:00:07.0: can't claim BAR 0 [io 0x7fe0100-0x7fe0100]: address conflict with 0001:00:06.0 [io 0x7fe01000600-0x7fe0100061f] So the quirk for M7101 claim the io range early. Acco

Re: [PATCH v10 06/59] PCI: Kill wrong quirk about M7101

2016-03-12 Thread Meelis Roos
pci 0001:00:06.0: quirk: [io 0x7fe01000800-0x7fe0100083f] claimed by > >> >> ali7101 ACPI > >> >> pci 0001:00:06.0: quirk: [io 0x7fe01000600-0x7fe0100061f] claimed by > >> >> ali7101 SMB > >> >> pci 0001:00:07.0: can't claim BAR 0

Re: [PATCH v10 06/59] PCI: Kill wrong quirk about M7101

2016-03-12 Thread Yinghai Lu
800-0x7fe0100083f] claimed by >> >> ali7101 ACPI >> >> pci 0001:00:06.0: quirk: [io 0x7fe01000600-0x7fe0100061f] claimed by >> >> ali7101 SMB >> >> pci 0001:00:07.0: can't claim BAR 0 [io 0x7fe0100-0x7fe0100]: >> >> address conflict

Re: [PATCH v10 06/59] PCI: Kill wrong quirk about M7101

2016-03-11 Thread Meelis Roos
io 0x7fe01000600-0x7fe0100061f] claimed by > >> ali7101 SMB > >> pci 0001:00:07.0: can't claim BAR 0 [io 0x7fe0100-0x7fe0100ffff]: > >> address conflict with 0001:00:06.0 [io 0x7fe01000600-0x7fe0100061f] > >> > >> So the quirk for M7101 claim t

Re: [PATCH v10 06/59] PCI: Kill wrong quirk about M7101

2016-03-11 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 2:08 PM, Yinghai Lu wrote: > > Maybe Linus could have some hint about that quirk? > > commit 34f550135e349102bd065488ea217ab27f0d > Author: Linus Torvalds > Date: Fri Nov 23 15:32:20 2007 -0500 > > Import 2.3.49pre2 Gah. That's marked as 2007, but that's an impo

Re: [PATCH v10 06/59] PCI: Kill wrong quirk about M7101

2016-03-11 Thread Yinghai Lu
>> pci 0001:00:07.0: can't claim BAR 0 [io 0x7fe0100-0x7fe0100]: >> address conflict with 0001:00:06.0 [io 0x7fe01000600-0x7fe0100061f] >> >> So the quirk for M7101 claim the io range early. >> >> According to spec with M7101 in M1543 page 103/

Re: [PATCH v10 06/59] PCI: Kill wrong quirk about M7101

2016-03-10 Thread Bjorn Helgaas
address conflict with 0001:00:06.0 [io 0x7fe01000600-0x7fe0100061f] > > So the quirk for M7101 claim the io range early. > > According to spec with M7101 in M1543 page 103/104, > http://www.versalogic.com/Support/Downloads/pdf/ali1543.pdf > 0xe0, and 0xe2 do not include address in

[PATCH v10 06/59] PCI: Kill wrong quirk about M7101

2016-02-24 Thread Yinghai Lu
ali7101 ACPI pci 0001:00:06.0: quirk: [io 0x7fe01000600-0x7fe0100061f] claimed by ali7101 SMB pci 0001:00:07.0: can't claim BAR 0 [io 0x7fe0100-0x7fe0100]: address conflict with 0001:00:06.0 [io 0x7fe01000600-0x7fe0100061f] So the quirk for M7101 claim the io range early. Acco

[PATCH v9 06/60] PCI: Kill wrong quirk about M7101

2015-12-10 Thread Yinghai Lu
ali7101 ACPI pci 0001:00:06.0: quirk: [io 0x7fe01000600-0x7fe0100061f] claimed by ali7101 SMB pci 0001:00:07.0: can't claim BAR 0 [io 0x7fe0100-0x7fe0100]: address conflict with 0001:00:06.0 [io 0x7fe01000600-0x7fe0100061f] So the quirk for M7101 claim the io range early. Acco

[PATCH v8 07/61] PCI: Kill wrong quirk about M7101

2015-10-27 Thread Yinghai Lu
ali7101 ACPI pci 0001:00:06.0: quirk: [io 0x7fe01000600-0x7fe0100061f] claimed by ali7101 SMB pci 0001:00:07.0: can't claim BAR 0 [io 0x7fe0100-0x7fe0100]: address conflict with 0001:00:06.0 [io 0x7fe01000600-0x7fe0100061f] So the quirk for M7101 claim the io range early. Acco

Re: [PATCH v7 07/60] PCI: kill wrong quirk about M7101

2015-10-12 Thread Yinghai Lu
On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 12:46 PM, Meelis Roos wrote: > > Does your for-pci-v4.4-next patchset in your git repo already contain > that? On V240 it seemed to be applied in your git. Yes. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...

Re: [PATCH v7 07/60] PCI: kill wrong quirk about M7101

2015-10-12 Thread Meelis Roos
0800-0x7fe0100083f] claimed by ali7101 > ACPI > pci 0001:00:06.0: quirk: [io 0x7fe01000600-0x7fe0100061f] claimed by ali7101 > SMB > pci 0001:00:07.0: can't claim BAR 0 [io 0x7fe0100-0x7fe0100]: > address conflict with 0001:00:06.0 [io 0x7fe01000600-0x7fe0100061f] &g

Re: [PATCH v7 07/60] PCI: kill wrong quirk about M7101

2015-10-09 Thread Khalid Aziz
t with 0001:00:06.0 [io 0x7fe01000600-0x7fe0100061f] > > So the quirk for M7101 claim the io range early. > > According to spec with M7101 in M1543 page 103/104, > http://www.versalogic.com/Support/Downloads/pdf/ali1543.pdf > 0xe0, and 0xe2 do not include address info for acp

[PATCH v7 07/60] PCI: kill wrong quirk about M7101

2015-10-08 Thread Yinghai Lu
ali7101 ACPI pci 0001:00:06.0: quirk: [io 0x7fe01000600-0x7fe0100061f] claimed by ali7101 SMB pci 0001:00:07.0: can't claim BAR 0 [io 0x7fe0100-0x7fe0100]: address conflict with 0001:00:06.0 [io 0x7fe01000600-0x7fe0100061f] So the quirk for M7101 claim the io range early. Acco

Re: M7101

2005-02-12 Thread Jean Delvare
Hi, > Will m7101.c be modified once quirks enabling the device? m7101.c is for 2.4 kernels while the proposed quirk is to be merged into 2.6 kernels, so m7101.c will still be needed as is. That said, if cleanups are made on the way to 2.6 and someone offers a patch that ports these cleanups b

Re: M7101

2005-02-08 Thread Ondrej Zary
Ivan Kokshaysky wrote: On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 03:06:11PM +, Matthew Wilcox wrote: Looks pretty good to me. For clarity, I'd change: - m7101 = pci_scan_single_device(dev->bus, 0x18); + m7101 = pci_scan_single_device(dev->bus, PCI_DEVFN(3, 0)); No, it's pretty brok

Re: M7101

2005-02-08 Thread Ivan Kokshaysky
On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 03:06:11PM +, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > Looks pretty good to me. For clarity, I'd change: > > - m7101 = pci_scan_single_device(dev->bus, 0x18); > + m7101 = pci_scan_single_device(dev->bus, PCI_DEVFN(3, 0)); No, it's pretty broken r

Re: M7101

2005-02-07 Thread Greg KH
On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 03:26:15PM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote: > Hi Enrico, > > Sorry for the delay. > > > I have a board with the ALI M7101 chip, but I can't activate it in > > BIOS. I tried to compile the prog/hotplug/m7101.c but I seen that > > this is only

Re: M7101

2005-02-06 Thread Grant Grundler
ards if it is OK? I'm not the maintainer, but it looks fine to me except for use of numeric constants (e.g 0x5f, 0x18) instead of adding #defines to name the values. But if no one knows what those offsets are for we'll just have to leave it. > For reference, here are links to the origin

Re: M7101

2005-02-06 Thread Matthew Wilcox
t; Any chance we could get the PCI folks to review the code and push it > upwards if it is OK? Looks pretty good to me. For clarity, I'd change: - m7101 = pci_scan_single_device(dev->bus, 0x18); + m7101 = pci_scan_single_device(dev->bus, PCI_DEVFN(3, 0)); and then test

Re: M7101

2005-02-06 Thread Jean Delvare
Hi Enrico, Sorry for the delay. > I have a board with the ALI M7101 chip, but I can't activate it in > BIOS. I tried to compile the prog/hotplug/m7101.c but I seen that > this is only for 2.4 Kernels. Is there a module for 2.6? The prog/hotplug/m7101.c (from the lm_sensors

M7101 unhiding patch

2005-02-01 Thread maartendeprez
Can this patch to drivers/pci/quirks.c be incorporated into the kernel? It fixes a bug in some BIOSes that hide the M7101 PMU and SMBUS device and is needed for some boards to use the i2c-ali15x3 driver. lm_sensors includes a module that makes that device visible. i got this patch from the

PATCH for 2.6: Enabling disabled M7101 device (quirks.c)

2005-01-18 Thread Enrico Bartky
Hello, I have ported the prog/hotplug/m7101.c module from lm_sensors for kernel 2.6. Here is the patch. EnricoB __ Verschicken Sie romantische, coole und witzige Bilder per SMS! Jetzt bei WEB.DE FreeMail: http://f.web.de/?mc=021193