On 5/29/07, Michael-Luke Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 29 May 2007, at 11:41, Satyam Sharma wrote:
> This is syntactically correct (and wouldn't produce any build errors),
> but it's quite ... strange, still. Why would I even want to /build/
> the
> compress code if all I selected was the
On 29 May 2007, at 11:41, Satyam Sharma wrote:
This is syntactically correct (and wouldn't produce any build errors),
but it's quite ... strange, still. Why would I even want to /build/
the
compress code if all I selected was the decompress option?
Apologies, you gave me the answer I was
On 5/29/07, Michael-Luke Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 28 May 2007, at 15:34, Nitin Gupta wrote:
> diff --git a/lib/Kconfig b/lib/Kconfig
> index 2e7ae6b..eb95eaa 100644
> --- a/lib/Kconfig
> +++ b/lib/Kconfig
> @@ -64,6 +64,12 @@ config ZLIB_INFLATE
> config ZLIB_DEFLATE
> tristate
On 28 May 2007, at 15:34, Nitin Gupta wrote:
diff --git a/lib/Kconfig b/lib/Kconfig
index 2e7ae6b..eb95eaa 100644
--- a/lib/Kconfig
+++ b/lib/Kconfig
@@ -64,6 +64,12 @@ config ZLIB_INFLATE
config ZLIB_DEFLATE
tristate
+config LZO1X_COMPRESS
+ tristate
+
+config LZO1X_DECOMPRESS
+
On 28 May 2007, at 15:34, Nitin Gupta wrote:
diff --git a/lib/Kconfig b/lib/Kconfig
index 2e7ae6b..eb95eaa 100644
--- a/lib/Kconfig
+++ b/lib/Kconfig
@@ -64,6 +64,12 @@ config ZLIB_INFLATE
config ZLIB_DEFLATE
tristate
+config LZO1X_COMPRESS
+ tristate
+
+config LZO1X_DECOMPRESS
+
On 5/29/07, Michael-Luke Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 28 May 2007, at 15:34, Nitin Gupta wrote:
diff --git a/lib/Kconfig b/lib/Kconfig
index 2e7ae6b..eb95eaa 100644
--- a/lib/Kconfig
+++ b/lib/Kconfig
@@ -64,6 +64,12 @@ config ZLIB_INFLATE
config ZLIB_DEFLATE
tristate
On 29 May 2007, at 11:41, Satyam Sharma wrote:
This is syntactically correct (and wouldn't produce any build errors),
but it's quite ... strange, still. Why would I even want to /build/
the
compress code if all I selected was the decompress option?
Apologies, you gave me the answer I was
On 5/29/07, Michael-Luke Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 29 May 2007, at 11:41, Satyam Sharma wrote:
This is syntactically correct (and wouldn't produce any build errors),
but it's quite ... strange, still. Why would I even want to /build/
the
compress code if all I selected was the
8 matches
Mail list logo
