On Tue, 6 Nov 2007 22:15:37 -0800
Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2 Nov 2007 06:23:48 -0700 (PDT) Alex Dubov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > I also wonder, where do I send the patches if nobody currently maintains
> > this thing?
> >
>
> Me, Pierre, lkml?
I'm not
> On Fri, 2 Nov 2007 06:23:48 -0700 (PDT) Alex Dubov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> After a much longer, than expected, time I managed to implement a support for
> MemoryStick (read-only currently, as there's still a subtle data corruption
> bug with writes) and MemoryStick Pro cards. The
On Fri, 2 Nov 2007 06:23:48 -0700 (PDT) Alex Dubov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After a much longer, than expected, time I managed to implement a support for
MemoryStick (read-only currently, as there's still a subtle data corruption
bug with writes) and MemoryStick Pro cards. The implementation
On Tue, 6 Nov 2007 22:15:37 -0800
Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2 Nov 2007 06:23:48 -0700 (PDT) Alex Dubov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I also wonder, where do I send the patches if nobody currently maintains
this thing?
Me, Pierre, lkml?
I'm not sure sending it
After a much longer, than expected, time I managed to implement a support for
MemoryStick (read-only currently, as there's still a subtle data corruption bug
with writes) and MemoryStick Pro cards. The implementation follows the MMC
driver model (there exist MSIO cards, but none are supported
After a much longer, than expected, time I managed to implement a support for
MemoryStick (read-only currently, as there's still a subtle data corruption bug
with writes) and MemoryStick Pro cards. The implementation follows the MMC
driver model (there exist MSIO cards, but none are supported
6 matches
Mail list logo
