Re: Microchip USB Hub Driver Harmonization

2017-05-18 Thread Krzysztof Kozlowski
On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 7:33 AM, Richard Leitner wrote: >>> 2. What would be a good prefix for common headers/functions/macros/etc.? >>> I thought of "mcusbhub"... Would that be OK? Or are there any >>> conventions/better proposals on that? >> >> >> If you are going to develop one driver for entir

Re: Microchip USB Hub Driver Harmonization

2017-05-17 Thread Richard Leitner
On 05/17/2017 06:01 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 12:58:38PM +0200, Richard Leitner wrote: ... 1. Currently usb251xb uses i2c_smbus_*, usb3503 uses regmap_* and usb4604 uses i2c_master_* functions for the hub configuration. What would be the preferred solution? regmap

Re: Microchip USB Hub Driver Harmonization

2017-05-17 Thread Krzysztof Kozlowski
On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 12:58:38PM +0200, Richard Leitner wrote: > Hello, > due to the fact (all?) the Microchip (former SMSC) USB hubs share the > same I2C configuration interface, I'm currently working on harmonizing > those USB Hub drivers. Currently this affects the usb251xb, usb3503 and > usb4

Microchip USB Hub Driver Harmonization

2017-05-17 Thread Richard Leitner
Hello, due to the fact (all?) the Microchip (former SMSC) USB hubs share the same I2C configuration interface, I'm currently working on harmonizing those USB Hub drivers. Currently this affects the usb251xb, usb3503 and usb4604 drivers. To avoid preventable efforts (and patch versions) I have some