Re: Mis-backport in af_unix patch for Linux 3.10.95

2016-01-24 Thread Greg KH
On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 11:16:25AM -0500, Sultan Qasim wrote: > Hello, > > Thank you very much for the warm welcome :-) > > You're right, the noblock variable is used elsewhere in the stream > receive function, so nothing is needed there after the interruptible > logic is restored for the dgram f

Re: Mis-backport in af_unix patch for Linux 3.10.95

2016-01-24 Thread Sultan Qasim
Hello, Thank you very much for the warm welcome :-) You're right, the noblock variable is used elsewhere in the stream receive function, so nothing is needed there after the interruptible logic is restored for the dgram function. Your patch looks good to me. I had picked the Linux 3.12.52 versio

Re: Mis-backport in af_unix patch for Linux 3.10.95

2016-01-24 Thread Willy Tarreau
Hello, On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 12:10:35AM -0500, Sultan Qasim wrote: > Hello all, > > I'm an outsider to the Linux kernel community, so I apologize if this > is not the right channel to mention this. The simple fact that you participate, inspect the code and report bugs makes you part of this co

Mis-backport in af_unix patch for Linux 3.10.95

2016-01-23 Thread Sultan Qasim
Hello all, I'm an outsider to the Linux kernel community, so I apologize if this is not the right channel to mention this. I noticed that the backported version of the patch "af_unix: Revert 'lock_interruptible' in stream receive code" in Linux 3.10.95 seems to have removed the mutex_lock_interrup