Re: Monster switch for small size (was Linux-tiny revival)

2007-09-20 Thread Christian MICHON
On 9/20/07, Rob Landley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > (I cut the bit where you reinvent miniconfig. People keep doing this. I dig > it up and resubmit it every year or so, so Roman Zippel can shoot it down > again. Meanwhile, not only is Firmware Linux happily using it, but I even > wrote more do

Re: Monster switch for small size (was Linux-tiny revival)

2007-09-20 Thread Randy Dunlap
On Thu, 20 Sep 2007 16:41:22 -0500 Rob Landley wrote: > On Thursday 20 September 2007 12:10:50 pm Tim Bird wrote: > > Andy Whitcroft wrote: > > > Knowing nothing about these options, from a test perspective it would > > > be nice if we were able to simply enable "the lot" so we can do "normal" > >

Re: Monster switch for small size (was Linux-tiny revival)

2007-09-20 Thread Rob Landley
On Thursday 20 September 2007 12:10:50 pm Tim Bird wrote: > Andy Whitcroft wrote: > > Knowing nothing about these options, from a test perspective it would > > be nice if we were able to simply enable "the lot" so we can do "normal" > > -mm runs and "tiny" -mm runs without any manual intervention?

Monster switch for small size (was Linux-tiny revival)

2007-09-20 Thread Tim Bird
Andy Whitcroft wrote: > Knowing nothing about these options, from a test perspective it would > be nice if we were able to simply enable "the lot" so we can do "normal" > -mm runs and "tiny" -mm runs without any manual intervention? I agree completely. I have been thinking for a while about how t