Re: Re[2]: More ARM binutils fuckage

2006-12-06 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 12/6/06, Paul Sokolovsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello Lennert, Wednesday, December 6, 2006, 3:08:13 AM, you wrote: [] > (These > days I build all kernels in EABI mode with old-ABI compat.) I have > not run into any code generation issues with this compiler yet. I wonder, if OABI-comp

Re: More ARM binutils fuckage

2006-12-06 Thread Koen Kooi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Paul Sokolovsky schreef: > Hello Lennert, > > Wednesday, December 6, 2006, 3:08:13 AM, you wrote: > > [] >> (These >> days I build all kernels in EABI mode with old-ABI compat.) I have >> not run into any code generation issues with this compiler ye

Re[2]: More ARM binutils fuckage

2006-12-05 Thread Paul Sokolovsky
Hello Lennert, Wednesday, December 6, 2006, 3:08:13 AM, you wrote: [] > (These > days I build all kernels in EABI mode with old-ABI compat.) I have > not run into any code generation issues with this compiler yet. I wonder, if OABI-compat is known to actually work on OABI userspace, I mean, o

Re: More ARM binutils fuckage

2006-12-05 Thread Michael K. Edwards
On 12/5/06, Russell King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: There is no such thing as soft VFP. Patches have been floating around for quite some time that implement soft float with VFP parameter passing conventions (which notably implies native endianness, unlike FPA). They all seem to derive from Nic

Re: More ARM binutils fuckage

2006-12-05 Thread Lennert Buytenhek
On Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 12:22:26AM +, Russell King wrote: > Enabling EABI needs a compiler which supports EABI. That's where I > get fuzzy but recent gcc 4 should be suitable. I have had it suggested > to me that EABI support in the toolchain isn't all that stable at the > moment. I use a b

Re: More ARM binutils fuckage

2006-12-05 Thread Russell King
On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 07:33:57PM +, Russell King wrote: > There's not much to say about this, other than scream and go hide in the > corner. ARM toolchains are just basically fscked. > > arm-linux-ld -EL -p --no-undefined -X -o .tmp_vmlinux1 -T > arch/arm/kernel/vmlinux.lds arch/arm/ker

Re: More ARM binutils fuckage

2006-12-05 Thread Russell King
On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 03:29:22PM -0800, Michael K. Edwards wrote: > On 12/5/06, Russell King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >There's not much to say about this, other than scream and go hide in the > >corner. ARM toolchains are just basically fscked. > > And while we're on the topic of ARM linux

Re: More ARM binutils fuckage

2006-12-05 Thread Michael K. Edwards
On 12/5/06, Russell King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: There's not much to say about this, other than scream and go hide in the corner. ARM toolchains are just basically fscked. And while we're on the topic of ARM linux toolchain fsckage, it would be nice to know what patches and incantations are

More ARM binutils fuckage

2006-12-05 Thread Russell King
There's not much to say about this, other than scream and go hide in the corner. ARM toolchains are just basically fscked. arm-linux-ld -EL -p --no-undefined -X -o .tmp_vmlinux1 -T arch/arm/kernel/vmlinux.lds arch/arm/kernel/head.o arch/arm/kernel/init_task.o init/built-in.o --start-group