Hi,
It is working since I enabled this ATA_PIIX driver. :)
Appearantly "old" has nothing to do with the age of the mainboard and
it's capabilities.
an UDMA33 board works with the "new" driver even :)
Thanks a lot, next beer/slivovica/palinka is on me :)
Patrick
-
To unsubscribe from this
Hi,
It is working since I enabled this ATA_PIIX driver. :)
Appearantly old has nothing to do with the age of the mainboard and
it's capabilities.
an UDMA33 board works with the new driver even :)
Thanks a lot, next beer/slivovica/palinka is on me :)
Patrick
-
To unsubscribe from this list:
On Sun, 4 Feb 2007 20:59:23 +0100
"Patrick Ale" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2/4/07, Patrick Ale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 2/4/07, Alan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > \
> > > OLDPIIX is for "old" PIIX devices only - from pentium era. It does not
> > > cover the later chips at all
>
>
It's working, thanks :)
I was confused by this ATA_PIIX driver needing to be enabled, I
genuinly thought and read it was the SATA driver.
Thanks :)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at
On 2/4/07, Patrick Ale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 2/4/07, Alan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
\
> OLDPIIX is for "old" PIIX devices only - from pentium era. It does not
> cover the later chips at all
Just to make sure, this is a P2 SMP board, Slot A, doesnt even support P3 CPUs.
The board is
On 2/4/07, Alan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
\
OLDPIIX is for "old" PIIX devices only - from pentium era. It does not
cover the later chips at all
Well, neither driver works, as you can see in my config I have the
"OLD" driver and the "new" driver, neither driver makes my controller
being
On Sun, 4 Feb 2007 20:33:39 +0100
"Patrick Ale" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2/4/07, Patrick Ale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Amm,
>
> not to sound like a wise guy but... CONFIG_ATA_PIIX is the SATA
> driver, not the PATA driver.. atleast that is what menuconfig tells me
> when I select
On 2/4/07, Patrick Ale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Amm,
not to sound like a wise guy but... CONFIG_ATA_PIIX is the SATA
driver, not the PATA driver.. atleast that is what menuconfig tells me
when I select "Help" when I look at the config options
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
On 2/4/07, Alan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
PATA_OLDPIIX drives the PIIX (the original not PIIX3,4, etc)
People do find that confusing so if there is any rewording for
Configure.help that would have made it easier and more obvious let me know
Okay so.. what do I define now to use libsata
> And this config has clearly:
>
> # CONFIG_ATA_PIIX is not set
>
> Which for a PIIX4 chipset is what you want. Somewhat confusingly:
>
> CONFIG_PATA_MPIIX=y
> CONFIG_PATA_OLDPIIX=y
>
> Should be "n", I've been told.
Setthing them as well will cause no problems.
ATA_PIIX drives the Intel
On 2/4/07, Alistair John Strachan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Which for a PIIX4 chipset is what you want. Somewhat confusingly:
CONFIG_PATA_MPIIX=y
CONFIG_PATA_OLDPIIX=y
Should be "n", I've been told.
What? No, this cant be. CONFIG_PATA_OLDPIIX is supposed to be the
libsata version for the
On Sunday 04 February 2007 18:20, Patrick Ale wrote:
> On 2/4/07, Robert Hancock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > ata_piix should drive that chipset. Was that driver enabled in the
> > kernel configuration, and if it's built modular is the initrd, etc. set
> > up to load it on boot?
>
> Hi,
>
> Yep,
Patrick Ale wrote:
Hi,
I tried to use the new pata drivers on a Dual PII-400Mhz with the
Intel PIIX controller.
Unfortunately the controller doesn't get detected on boot time, the
old IDE drivers do work and see the controller as a PIIX4 chipset,
which is correct.
The mainboard is a Asus P2B
> Unfortunately the controller doesn't get detected on boot time, the
> old IDE drivers do work and see the controller as a PIIX4 chipset,
> which is correct.
Please provide kernel version, an lspci -vvxxx, the actual type of
controller if you know it (if not the lspci will show it) and your
Hi,
I tried to use the new pata drivers on a Dual PII-400Mhz with the
Intel PIIX controller.
Unfortunately the controller doesn't get detected on boot time, the
old IDE drivers do work and see the controller as a PIIX4 chipset,
which is correct.
The mainboard is a Asus P2B with integrated
Hi,
I tried to use the new pata drivers on a Dual PII-400Mhz with the
Intel PIIX controller.
Unfortunately the controller doesn't get detected on boot time, the
old IDE drivers do work and see the controller as a PIIX4 chipset,
which is correct.
The mainboard is a Asus P2B with integrated
Unfortunately the controller doesn't get detected on boot time, the
old IDE drivers do work and see the controller as a PIIX4 chipset,
which is correct.
Please provide kernel version, an lspci -vvxxx, the actual type of
controller if you know it (if not the lspci will show it) and your .config
Patrick Ale wrote:
Hi,
I tried to use the new pata drivers on a Dual PII-400Mhz with the
Intel PIIX controller.
Unfortunately the controller doesn't get detected on boot time, the
old IDE drivers do work and see the controller as a PIIX4 chipset,
which is correct.
The mainboard is a Asus P2B
On Sunday 04 February 2007 18:20, Patrick Ale wrote:
On 2/4/07, Robert Hancock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ata_piix should drive that chipset. Was that driver enabled in the
kernel configuration, and if it's built modular is the initrd, etc. set
up to load it on boot?
Hi,
Yep, piix was
On 2/4/07, Alistair John Strachan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Which for a PIIX4 chipset is what you want. Somewhat confusingly:
CONFIG_PATA_MPIIX=y
CONFIG_PATA_OLDPIIX=y
Should be n, I've been told.
What? No, this cant be. CONFIG_PATA_OLDPIIX is supposed to be the
libsata version for the PIIX
And this config has clearly:
# CONFIG_ATA_PIIX is not set
Which for a PIIX4 chipset is what you want. Somewhat confusingly:
CONFIG_PATA_MPIIX=y
CONFIG_PATA_OLDPIIX=y
Should be n, I've been told.
Setthing them as well will cause no problems.
ATA_PIIX drives the Intel PIIX3,PIIX4,ICH
On 2/4/07, Alan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
PATA_OLDPIIX drives the PIIX (the original not PIIX3,4, etc)
People do find that confusing so if there is any rewording for
Configure.help that would have made it easier and more obvious let me know
Okay so.. what do I define now to use libsata with
On 2/4/07, Patrick Ale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Amm,
not to sound like a wise guy but... CONFIG_ATA_PIIX is the SATA
driver, not the PATA driver.. atleast that is what menuconfig tells me
when I select Help when I look at the config options
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
On Sun, 4 Feb 2007 20:33:39 +0100
Patrick Ale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/4/07, Patrick Ale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Amm,
not to sound like a wise guy but... CONFIG_ATA_PIIX is the SATA
driver, not the PATA driver.. atleast that is what menuconfig tells me
when I select Help when I
On 2/4/07, Alan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
\
OLDPIIX is for old PIIX devices only - from pentium era. It does not
cover the later chips at all
Well, neither driver works, as you can see in my config I have the
OLD driver and the new driver, neither driver makes my controller
being detected...
On 2/4/07, Patrick Ale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/4/07, Alan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
\
OLDPIIX is for old PIIX devices only - from pentium era. It does not
cover the later chips at all
Just to make sure, this is a P2 SMP board, Slot A, doesnt even support P3 CPUs.
The board is something
It's working, thanks :)
I was confused by this ATA_PIIX driver needing to be enabled, I
genuinly thought and read it was the SATA driver.
Thanks :)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at
On Sun, 4 Feb 2007 20:59:23 +0100
Patrick Ale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/4/07, Patrick Ale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/4/07, Alan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
\
OLDPIIX is for old PIIX devices only - from pentium era. It does not
cover the later chips at all
Just to make sure, this
28 matches
Mail list logo
