Hi,
On Friday 19 August 2005 00:18, George Anzinger wrote:
> Not to say that is wrong but just to make it clear that saying the
> itanium speed is is like saying that a cummings diesel is fast with
> out saying what sort of car/truck it is mounted in.
Yes, esp. since we all known that the fast
David S. Miller wrote:
From: Anton Blanchard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2005 04:29:55 +1000
Calling itanium the "fastest 64bit processor at any given clock frequency"
on lkml is likewise inflammatory :)
I totally agree.
Since the itanium off loads a lot of its instruction steam
From: Anton Blanchard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2005 04:29:55 +1000
> Calling itanium the "fastest 64bit processor at any given clock frequency"
> on lkml is likewise inflammatory :)
I totally agree.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body
> Itanium processors are the fastest 64bit processors at any given clock
> frequency. The earlier generations of processors do not even have the
> instruction set that would enable the processor to do more parallel
> processing. =-)
>
> Please do not make such inflammatory statements on the
On Mer, 2005-08-17 at 12:52 -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > compared to small, this may be the reason why amd64 is the fasttest
> > 64-bit process ?
> Itanium processors are the fastest 64bit processors at any given clock
> frequency.
Perhaps, and the two statements don't contradict. All he
On Wed, 17 Aug 2005, vamsi krishna wrote:
> Seems like most of core size(VmSize) on ipf (126MB) is coming from the
> code size(VmExe) i.e 97MB. While the code size is just 62MB on amd64.
>
> Looks like IA-64 wastes a lot of VM due to big instruction sizes, so
> big instruction sizes will improve
Hello All,
Really thankful for your inputs!
> Itanium instruction set is not as compact as some other architectures,
> so the same program will typically require more bytes of code.
I stopped the program on both amd64 machine and ia64 machine and
grepped the values from /proc/<>/status and found
On Tue, 16 Aug 2005, vamsi krishna wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> Sorry to interrupt you.
>
> I have been investigating a problem in which there has been a dramatic
> core size (complete program size) of a program running on a IA-64
> machine running kernel version 2.4.21-4.0.1 (A redhat advanced server
>I have been investigating a problem in which there has been a dramatic
> core size (complete program size) of a program running on a IA-64
>machine running kernel version 2.4.21-4.0.1 (A redhat advanced server
>distribution) compared to other 64-bit architectures like amd64 and
>EM64T. There has
vamsi krishna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> example /lib/libc-2.2.4.so size 6094859got mapped 3 times with
> permissions 'r-xp' , '---p' and 'rw-p' from the bottom.
Note the file offset.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstraße 5, 904
Hello All,
Sorry to interrupt you.
I have been investigating a problem in which there has been a dramatic
core size (complete program size) of a program running on a IA-64
machine running kernel version 2.4.21-4.0.1 (A redhat advanced server
distribution) compared to other 64-bit architectures l
11 matches
Mail list logo
