>
> Does this patch fix it?
Didn't hit that particular oops with that anymore in several LTP runs and
your patch applied, but got this data corruption:
doio(rwtest04) (20172) 19:01:03
-
*** DATA COMPARISON ERROR ***
check_file(/tmp/ltp-14369/mm-sync-20156, 12754624, 23879,
On Tue, 2007-04-24 at 16:05 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
>
> Another issue hit during LTP testing over nfsroot; this time
> on a larger box (4 cores; 6GB RAM; x86-64)
>
> NFS doesn't seem to be in a good shape for .21
>
> -Andi
>
> Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at
Another issue hit during LTP testing over nfsroot; this time
on a larger box (4 cores; 6GB RAM; x86-64)
NFS doesn't seem to be in a good shape for .21
-Andi
Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at RIP:
[] nfs_set_page_dirty+0xd/0x5d
PGD 115735067 PUD 11a60a067
Another issue hit during LTP testing over nfsroot; this time
on a larger box (4 cores; 6GB RAM; x86-64)
NFS doesn't seem to be in a good shape for .21
-Andi
Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at RIP:
[8031076b] nfs_set_page_dirty+0xd/0x5d
PGD 115735067
On Tue, 2007-04-24 at 16:05 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
Another issue hit during LTP testing over nfsroot; this time
on a larger box (4 cores; 6GB RAM; x86-64)
NFS doesn't seem to be in a good shape for .21
-Andi
Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at RIP:
Does this patch fix it?
Didn't hit that particular oops with that anymore in several LTP runs and
your patch applied, but got this data corruption:
doio(rwtest04) (20172) 19:01:03
-
*** DATA COMPARISON ERROR ***
check_file(/tmp/ltp-14369/mm-sync-20156, 12754624, 23879,
6 matches
Mail list logo
