On Wed, 7 Aug 2019, Austin Kim wrote:
Again:
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
A: No.
Q: Should I include quotations after my reply?
http://daringfire
Is it possible for you to generate kernel patch only with **kernel
log** for 'use-after-free' case?
With kernel log, we only have limited information, so it is hard to
debug 'use-after-free' case with this signature.
For this matter, kernel should be compiled with below config.
CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG=y
On Wed, 7 Aug 2019, Austin Kim wrote:
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
A: No.
Q: Should I include quotations after my reply?
http://daringfireb
I wonder what kinds of workqueue is used in case of this panic.
If system workqueue(system_wq) is used for this case, it would be a
help to replace it with high priority workqueue(system_highpri_wq). If
panic disappers with high priority workqueue(system_highpri_wq), we
would think about another s
On 2019-07-19 09:53:52 [-0400], Sasha Levin wrote:
> Hi folks,
Hi,
> We're seeing a rare panic on boot in wq_worker_sleeping() on boot in
> 4.19 kernels. I wasn't able to reproduce this with 5.2, but I'm not sure
> whether it's because the issue is fixed, or I was just unlucky.
>
> The panic look
Hi folks,
We're seeing a rare panic on boot in wq_worker_sleeping() on boot in
4.19 kernels. I wasn't able to reproduce this with 5.2, but I'm not sure
whether it's because the issue is fixed, or I was just unlucky.
The panic looks like this:
[0.852791] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL poi
6 matches
Mail list logo
