On Tue, 5 Apr 2005, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-04-05 at 01:05 -0400, James Morris wrote:
> > Evgeniy,
> >
> > Please send networking patches to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> It was sent there two times.
I googled around quite a lot to track the origin of the patches down but
didn't do the
On Tue, 2005-04-05 at 07:00 -0400, jamal wrote:
> and, oh yeah - wheres the documentation Evgeniy? ;->
In the tree :)
Documentation/connector/connector.txt - some notes, API.
Documentation/connector/cn_test.c - kernel example.
Uses cn_netlink_send(), notification feature.
I will send today a path
and, oh yeah - wheres the documentation Evgeniy? ;->
cheers,
jamal
On Tue, 2005-04-05 at 06:44, jamal wrote:
> To be fair to Evgeniy I am not against the Konnector idea. I think that
> it is a useful feature to have an easy to use messaging between
> kernel-kernel and kernel-userspace. The fact
To be fair to Evgeniy I am not against the Konnector idea. I think that
it is a useful feature to have an easy to use messaging between
kernel-kernel and kernel-userspace. The fact that he leveraged netlink
instead of inventing things is a bonus. Having said that i have not
seriously scrutinized t
On Tue, 2005-04-05 at 11:34 +0400, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-04-05 at 01:10 -0400, Herbert Xu wrote:
>
> >In fact to this day I still don't understand what problems this thing is
> >meant to solve.
>
> Hmm, what else can I add to my words?
> May be checking the size of the code needed
On Tue, 2005-04-05 at 01:10 -0400, Herbert Xu wrote:
>On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 11:03:16AM +0400, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
>>
>> I received comments and feature requests from Herbert Xu and Jamal Hadi
>> Salim,
>> almost all were successfully resolved.
>
>Please do not construe my involvement in thes
On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 11:03:16AM +0400, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
>
> I received comments and feature requests from Herbert Xu and Jamal Hadi
> Salim,
> almost all were successfully resolved.
Please do not construe my involvement in these threads as endorsement
for this system.
In fact to this d
On Tue, 2005-04-05 at 01:10 -0400, James Morris wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Apr 2005, James Morris wrote:
>
> > A few questions:
>
> Also, please allow cn_add_callback() allow it to be passed a NULL
> callback function, so the caller doesn't pass in a dummy function and your
> code doesn't waste time de
On Tue, 2005-04-05 at 01:05 -0400, James Morris wrote:
> Evgeniy,
>
> Please send networking patches to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It was sent there two times.
> Your connector code (under drivers/connector) is now in the -mm tree and
> as far as I can tell, has not received any review from the network
On Tue, 5 Apr 2005, James Morris wrote:
> A few questions:
Also, please allow cn_add_callback() allow it to be passed a NULL
callback function, so the caller doesn't pass in a dummy function and your
code doesn't waste time dealing with something which isn't real.
- James
--
James Morris
<[E
Evgeniy,
Please send networking patches to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your connector code (under drivers/connector) is now in the -mm tree and
as far as I can tell, has not received any review from the network
developers.
Looking at it briefly, it seems quite unfinished.
I'm not entirely sure what it'
11 matches
Mail list logo
