Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 18:14:24 +0100
From: Fabien Ribes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I may get some time to work on this topic, but what do you mean by kill
it ?
It means removing all of the "RFC1122 Status" comments from net/ipv4/*.c
Is it the removal of RFC 1122 evaluation in modules'
"David S. Miller" a écrit :
>
>Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2000 16:58:55 +0100
>From: Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>On Fri, Dec 08, 2000 at 07:28:15AM -0800, David S. Miller wrote:
>> I agree, I'll kill it unless you want to commit to this work
>> Andi. :-)
>
>Kill it ;)
>
>
"David S. Miller" a écrit :
Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2000 16:58:55 +0100
From: Andi Kleen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Dec 08, 2000 at 07:28:15AM -0800, David S. Miller wrote:
I agree, I'll kill it unless you want to commit to this work
Andi. :-)
Kill it ;)
Done.
Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2000 16:58:55 +0100
From: Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Fri, Dec 08, 2000 at 07:28:15AM -0800, David S. Miller wrote:
> I agree, I'll kill it unless you want to commit to this work
> Andi. :-)
Kill it ;)
Done.
Seriously, if someone wants to do this work
Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2000 16:58:55 +0100
From: Andi Kleen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Dec 08, 2000 at 07:28:15AM -0800, David S. Miller wrote:
I agree, I'll kill it unless you want to commit to this work
Andi. :-)
Kill it ;)
Done.
Seriously, if someone wants to do this work
> That could even be automated when this little patch (against -test11, but
> -test12pre works too) is applied...
> +# MANPATH specifies where to install the manpages created from
> +# inline documentation
> +#
> +
> +MANDIR := /usr/share/man
> +
End user installed so
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> That could even be automated when this little patch (against -test11, but
> -test12pre works too) is applied...
Ok, I should actually attach the test11-final patch ;)
Christoph
--
Whip me. Beat me. Make me maintain AIX.
diff -uNr
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>> BTW what is this? It is just a question, I missed even the moment, when these
>> things appeared:
> It allows us to generate man9 sets for that part of the kernel and other
> documentation sets
That could even be automated when this little patch
Hello!
> They irritated you so much that you only noticed after six months ?
I really edit and even read skbuff.h not every day and even not every
month. Is this bad? 8)
"Irritated" is wrong word. "To get a scare" is closer to truth.
Alexey
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
> > Well, I am a fossil, of course, and like to read sources printed on paper
> > and all these pretentions to convert readbale text to hypertext irritate me.
> > But such deep thoughts eat even more expensive space on screen!
>
> So write a 4 line perl script to filter them out before printing
> BTW what is this? It is just a question, I missed even the moment, when these
> things appeared:
It allows us to generate man9 sets for that part of the kernel and other
documentation sets
> Well, I am a fossil, of course, and like to read sources printed on paper
> and all these pretentions
On Fri, Dec 08, 2000 at 07:41:22PM +0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> /**
> *kfree_skb - free an sk_buff
> *@skb: buffer to free
> *
> *Drop a reference to the buffer and free it if the usage count has
> *hit zero.
> */
>
> People, who need _literal_ translation from C to
Hello!
> Kill it ;)
Great day! Nobody will cry that information sort of this:
* MUST NOT send ICMP errors in reply to:
* ICMP errors (OK)
* Broadcast/multicast datagrams (OK)
* MAC broadcasts (OK)
* Non-initial fragments (OK)
* Datagram with a source address that
On Fri, Dec 08, 2000 at 05:19:30PM +0100, Fabien Ribes wrote:
> Andi Kleen a écrit :
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 08, 2000 at 06:54:28AM -0800, David S. Miller wrote:
> > >Date: Fri, 08 Dec 2000 15:46:59 +0100
> > >From: Fabien Ribes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >
> > >Looking at Linux kernel
Andi Kleen a écrit :
>
> On Fri, Dec 08, 2000 at 06:54:28AM -0800, David S. Miller wrote:
> >Date: Fri, 08 Dec 2000 15:46:59 +0100
> >From: Fabien Ribes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> >Looking at Linux kernel sources, I've found RFC1122 status splitted in
> >each file. Is there a
On Fri, Dec 08, 2000 at 07:28:15AM -0800, David S. Miller wrote:
>Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2000 16:31:54 +0100
>From: Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>On Fri, Dec 08, 2000 at 06:54:28AM -0800, David S. Miller wrote:
>> No, unfortunately nobody has the time to do this.
>
>The RFC
Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2000 16:31:54 +0100
From: Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Fri, Dec 08, 2000 at 06:54:28AM -0800, David S. Miller wrote:
> No, unfortunately nobody has the time to do this.
The RFC evaluation is also out of date and should be either redone
or removed.
I
On Fri, Dec 08, 2000 at 06:54:28AM -0800, David S. Miller wrote:
>Date: Fri, 08 Dec 2000 15:46:59 +0100
>From: Fabien Ribes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>Looking at Linux kernel sources, I've found RFC1122 status splitted in
>each file. Is there a complete document showing RFC1122
Date:Fri, 08 Dec 2000 15:46:59 +0100
From: Fabien Ribes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Looking at Linux kernel sources, I've found RFC1122 status splitted in
each file. Is there a complete document showing RFC1122 status as a
whole for a given kernel version ?
No, unfortunately
Date:Fri, 08 Dec 2000 15:46:59 +0100
From: Fabien Ribes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Looking at Linux kernel sources, I've found RFC1122 status splitted in
each file. Is there a complete document showing RFC1122 status as a
whole for a given kernel version ?
No, unfortunately nobody
On Fri, Dec 08, 2000 at 07:41:22PM +0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
/**
*kfree_skb - free an sk_buff
*@skb: buffer to free
*
*Drop a reference to the buffer and free it if the usage count has
*hit zero.
*/
People, who need _literal_ translation from C to English to
BTW what is this? It is just a question, I missed even the moment, when these
things appeared:
It allows us to generate man9 sets for that part of the kernel and other
documentation sets
Well, I am a fossil, of course, and like to read sources printed on paper
and all these pretentions to
Well, I am a fossil, of course, and like to read sources printed on paper
and all these pretentions to convert readbale text to hypertext irritate me.
But such deep thoughts eat even more expensive space on screen!
So write a 4 line perl script to filter them out before printing ?
Andi Kleen a écrit :
On Fri, Dec 08, 2000 at 06:54:28AM -0800, David S. Miller wrote:
Date: Fri, 08 Dec 2000 15:46:59 +0100
From: Fabien Ribes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Looking at Linux kernel sources, I've found RFC1122 status splitted in
each file. Is there a complete
On Fri, Dec 08, 2000 at 05:19:30PM +0100, Fabien Ribes wrote:
Andi Kleen a écrit :
On Fri, Dec 08, 2000 at 06:54:28AM -0800, David S. Miller wrote:
Date: Fri, 08 Dec 2000 15:46:59 +0100
From: Fabien Ribes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Looking at Linux kernel sources, I've
On Fri, Dec 08, 2000 at 06:54:28AM -0800, David S. Miller wrote:
Date: Fri, 08 Dec 2000 15:46:59 +0100
From: Fabien Ribes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Looking at Linux kernel sources, I've found RFC1122 status splitted in
each file. Is there a complete document showing RFC1122 status
Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2000 16:31:54 +0100
From: Andi Kleen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Dec 08, 2000 at 06:54:28AM -0800, David S. Miller wrote:
No, unfortunately nobody has the time to do this.
The RFC evaluation is also out of date and should be either redone
or removed.
I agree,
On Fri, Dec 08, 2000 at 07:28:15AM -0800, David S. Miller wrote:
Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2000 16:31:54 +0100
From: Andi Kleen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Dec 08, 2000 at 06:54:28AM -0800, David S. Miller wrote:
No, unfortunately nobody has the time to do this.
The RFC evaluation
Hello!
They irritated you so much that you only noticed after six months ?
I really edit and even read skbuff.h not every day and even not every
month. Is this bad? 8)
"Irritated" is wrong word. "To get a scare" is closer to truth.
Alexey
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
BTW what is this? It is just a question, I missed even the moment, when these
things appeared:
It allows us to generate man9 sets for that part of the kernel and other
documentation sets
That could even be automated when this little patch (against
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
That could even be automated when this little patch (against -test11, but
-test12pre works too) is applied...
Ok, I should actually attach the test11-final patch ;)
Christoph
--
Whip me. Beat me. Make me maintain AIX.
diff -uNr
That could even be automated when this little patch (against -test11, but
-test12pre works too) is applied...
+# MANPATH specifies where to install the manpages created from
+# inline documentation
+#
+
+MANDIR := /usr/share/man
+
End user installed so
/usr/local/man or
32 matches
Mail list logo
