[PATCH 4.4 64/78] include/linux/module.h: copy __init/__exit attrs to init/cleanup_module

/20190123173707.ga16...@gmail.com/ Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190206175627.ga20...@gmail.com/ Suggested-by: Martin Sebor Acked-by: Jessica Yu Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- include/linux/module.h | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff

[PATCH 4.9 40/42] include/linux/module.h: copy __init/__exit attrs to init/cleanup_module

-Hartman --- include/linux/module.h |4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) --- a/include/linux/module.h +++ b/include/linux/module.h @@ -129,13 +129,13 @@ extern void cleanup_module(void); #define module_init(initfn)\ static inline

[PATCH 4.14 65/69] include/linux/module.h: copy __init/__exit attrs to init/cleanup_module

://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190123173707.ga16...@gmail.com/ Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190206175627.ga20...@gmail.com/ Suggested-by: Martin Sebor Acked-by: Jessica Yu Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda Signed-off-by: Stefan Agner Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- include/linux/module.h |4

[PATCH 4.19 63/73] include/linux/module.h: copy __init/__exit attrs to init/cleanup_module

://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190123173707.ga16...@gmail.com/ Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190206175627.ga20...@gmail.com/ Suggested-by: Martin Sebor Acked-by: Jessica Yu Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda Signed-off-by: Stefan Agner Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- include/linux/module.h |4

Re: [PATCH] gcov: include linux/module.h for within_module

On 3/29/19 11:09 AM, Nick Desaulniers wrote: > On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 11:01 AM Randy Dunlap wrote: >> >> On 3/29/19 10:45 AM, Nick Desaulniers wrote: >>> Fixes commit 8c3d220cb6b5 ("gcov: clang support") >>> >>> Cc: Greg Hackmann >>> Cc: Tri Vo >>> Cc: Peter Oberparleiter >>> Cc:

Re: [PATCH] gcov: include linux/module.h for within_module

On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 11:01 AM Randy Dunlap wrote: > > On 3/29/19 10:45 AM, Nick Desaulniers wrote: > > Fixes commit 8c3d220cb6b5 ("gcov: clang support") > > > > Cc: Greg Hackmann > > Cc: Tri Vo > > Cc: Peter Oberparleiter > > Cc: linux...@kvack.org > > Cc: kbuild-...@01.org > > Reported-by:

Re: [PATCH] gcov: include linux/module.h for within_module

On 3/29/19 11:01 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 3/29/19 10:45 AM, Nick Desaulniers wrote: >> Fixes commit 8c3d220cb6b5 ("gcov: clang support") >> >> Cc: Greg Hackmann >> Cc: Tri Vo >> Cc: Peter Oberparleiter >> Cc: linux...@kvack.org >> Cc: kbuild-...@01.org >> Reported-by: kbuild test robot >>

Re: [PATCH] gcov: include linux/module.h for within_module

On 3/29/19 10:45 AM, Nick Desaulniers wrote: > Fixes commit 8c3d220cb6b5 ("gcov: clang support") > > Cc: Greg Hackmann > Cc: Tri Vo > Cc: Peter Oberparleiter > Cc: linux...@kvack.org > Cc: kbuild-...@01.org > Reported-by: kbuild test robot > Link:

[PATCH] gcov: include linux/module.h for within_module

Fixes commit 8c3d220cb6b5 ("gcov: clang support") Cc: Greg Hackmann Cc: Tri Vo Cc: Peter Oberparleiter Cc: linux...@kvack.org Cc: kbuild-...@01.org Reported-by: kbuild test robot Link: https://marc.info/?l=linux-mm=155384681109231=2 Signed-off-by: Nick Desaulniers --- kernel/gcov/gcc_3_4.c

Re: [PATCH 3/3] include/linux/module.h: copy __init/__exit attrs to init/cleanup_module

...@gmail.com/ Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190206175627.ga20...@gmail.com/ Suggested-by: Martin Sebor Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda Acked-by: Jessica Yu Thanks! --- include/linux/module.h | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/module.h b

[PATCH 3/3] include/linux/module.h: copy __init/__exit attrs to init/cleanup_module

/lkml/20190206175627.ga20...@gmail.com/ Suggested-by: Martin Sebor Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda --- include/linux/module.h | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/module.h b/include/linux/module.h index 8fa38d3e7538..f5bc4c046461 100644 --- a/include

Re: [PATCH v2] include/linux/module.h: mark init/cleanup_module aliases as __init/exit

On Thu, Feb 7, 2019 at 11:54 AM Jessica Yu wrote: > > My order of preference would be 2, 1, striving for 3 eventually. For reference, for 3), we would need to tweak the following ~130 modules [1]. Quite a lot of them are the simple kind. Also, if we end up with 3), we could potentially remove a

Re: [PATCH v2] include/linux/module.h: mark init/cleanup_module aliases as __init/exit

+++ Miguel Ojeda [06/02/19 22:19 +0100]: On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 6:56 PM Miguel Ojeda wrote: diff --git a/include/linux/module.h b/include/linux/module.h index 8fa38d3e7538..1b5e370f1bc0 100644 --- a/include/linux/module.h +++ b/include/linux/module.h @@ -129,13 +129,13 @@ extern void

Re: [PATCH v2] include/linux/module.h: mark init/cleanup_module aliases as __init/exit

On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 6:56 PM Miguel Ojeda wrote: > > diff --git a/include/linux/module.h b/include/linux/module.h > index 8fa38d3e7538..1b5e370f1bc0 100644 > --- a/include/linux/module.h > +++ b/include/linux/module.h > @@ -129,13 +129,13 @@ extern void cleanup_module

[PATCH v2] include/linux/module.h: mark init/cleanup_module aliases as __init/exit

be assumed to be unlikely). Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190123173707.ga16...@gmail.com/ Suggested-by: Martin Sebor Tested-by: Laura Abbott Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda --- The new version I pushed for -next. include/linux/module.h | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions

Re: [PATCH] include/linux/module.h: mark init/cleanup_module aliases as __cold

On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 5:31 PM Miguel Ojeda wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 4:08 PM Jessica Yu wrote: > > > > IMHO I think annotating with __init is more straightforward, instead > > of cherry-picking attributes (we wouldn't know at first glance why the > > aliases are specifically annotated

Re: [PATCH] include/linux/module.h: mark init/cleanup_module aliases as __cold

On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 4:08 PM Jessica Yu wrote: > > IMHO I think annotating with __init is more straightforward, instead > of cherry-picking attributes (we wouldn't know at first glance why the > aliases are specifically annotated with __cold without looking at git > history). Plus the actual

Re: [PATCH] include/linux/module.h: mark init/cleanup_module aliases as __cold

+++ Miguel Ojeda [31/01/19 17:48 +0100]: Hi Jessica, On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 3:22 PM Jessica Yu wrote: Hi Miguel, sorry for the delay! No worries! :) The module init functions are only called once from do_init_module(). Does the __cold attribute just assume it is unlikely to be executed,

Re: [PATCH] include/linux/module.h: mark init/cleanup_module aliases as __cold

Hi Jessica, On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 3:22 PM Jessica Yu wrote: > > Hi Miguel, sorry for the delay! No worries! :) > The module init functions are only called once from do_init_module(). > Does the __cold attribute just assume it is unlikely to be executed, > or just that it is infrequently

Re: [PATCH] include/linux/module.h: mark init/cleanup_module aliases as __cold

this in the compiler-attributes tree and get some time in linux-next, unless you want to pick it up! include/linux/module.h | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/module.h b/include/linux/module.h index 8fa38d3e7538..c4e805e87628 100644 --- a/include/linux

Re: [PATCH] include/linux/module.h: mark init/cleanup_module aliases as __cold

paths that end up calling the __init/__exit functions are not meant to be taken (but when we are asked to load modules, that is the expected path, no?). I will put this in the compiler-attributes tree and get some time in linux-next, unless you want to pick it up! include/linux/module.h | 4

[PATCH] include/linux/module.h: mark init/cleanup_module aliases as __cold

functions are not meant to be taken (but when we are asked to load modules, that is the expected path, no?). I will put this in the compiler-attributes tree and get some time in linux-next, unless you want to pick it up! include/linux/module.h | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions

Applied "ASoC: intel: include linux/module.h as needed" to the asoc tree

The patch ASoC: intel: include linux/module.h as needed has been applied to the asoc tree at https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent

Applied "ASoC: intel: include linux/module.h as needed" to the asoc tree

The patch ASoC: intel: include linux/module.h as needed has been applied to the asoc tree at https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent

[PATCH] ASoC: intel: include linux/module.h as needed

The MODULE_DESCRIPTION() macro is only available when including the linux/module.h header. Apparently this is included indirectly from sst-firmware.c in some configurations, but not in others: sound/soc/intel/common/sst-firmware.c:1278:20: error: expected declaration specifiers or '...' before

[PATCH] ASoC: intel: include linux/module.h as needed

The MODULE_DESCRIPTION() macro is only available when including the linux/module.h header. Apparently this is included indirectly from sst-firmware.c in some configurations, but not in others: sound/soc/intel/common/sst-firmware.c:1278:20: error: expected declaration specifiers or '...' before

Re: [PATCH] IB/hns: include linux/module.h

On Fri, 2017-02-17 at 15:38 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > I ran into a build error on arm64 randconfig testing: > > infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_main.c:539:1: error: data definition has > no type or storage class [-Werror] > infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_main.c:539:1: error: type defaults to > 'int'

Re: [PATCH] IB/hns: include linux/module.h

On Fri, 2017-02-17 at 15:38 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > I ran into a build error on arm64 randconfig testing: > > infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_main.c:539:1: error: data definition has > no type or storage class [-Werror] > infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_main.c:539:1: error: type defaults to > 'int'

[PATCH] IB/hns: include linux/module.h

I ran into a build error on arm64 randconfig testing: infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_main.c:539:1: error: data definition has no type or storage class [-Werror] infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_main.c:539:1: error: type defaults to 'int' in declaration of 'MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE' [-Werror=implicit-int]

[PATCH] IB/hns: include linux/module.h

I ran into a build error on arm64 randconfig testing: infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_main.c:539:1: error: data definition has no type or storage class [-Werror] infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_main.c:539:1: error: type defaults to 'int' in declaration of 'MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE' [-Werror=implicit-int]

Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: imx21: include linux/module.h

On Wednesday, July 6, 2016 9:21:39 AM CEST Paul Gortmaker wrote: > > --- a/drivers/pinctrl/freescale/pinctrl-imx21.c > > +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/freescale/pinctrl-imx21.c > > @@ -325,7 +325,6 @@ static const struct of_device_id > > imx21_pinctrl_of_match[] = > > { .compatible =

Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: imx21: include linux/module.h

On Wednesday, July 6, 2016 9:21:39 AM CEST Paul Gortmaker wrote: > > --- a/drivers/pinctrl/freescale/pinctrl-imx21.c > > +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/freescale/pinctrl-imx21.c > > @@ -325,7 +325,6 @@ static const struct of_device_id > > imx21_pinctrl_of_match[] = > > { .compatible =

Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: imx21: include linux/module.h

[Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: imx21: include linux/module.h] On 06/07/2016 (Wed 10:15) Fabio Estevam wrote: > Hi Arnd, > > On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 9:52 AM, Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de> wrote: > > The pinctrl driver includes a device table, but the macro used for > > declaring

Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: imx21: include linux/module.h

[Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: imx21: include linux/module.h] On 06/07/2016 (Wed 10:15) Fabio Estevam wrote: > Hi Arnd, > > On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 9:52 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > The pinctrl driver includes a device table, but the macro used for > > declaring it is

Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: imx21: include linux/module.h

On Wednesday, July 6, 2016 10:15:41 AM CEST Fabio Estevam wrote: > I think the correct fix here would be: > > --- a/drivers/pinctrl/freescale/pinctrl-imx21.c > +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/freescale/pinctrl-imx21.c > @@ -325,7 +325,6 @@ static const struct of_device_id imx21_pinctrl_of_match[] > = >

Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: imx21: include linux/module.h

On Wednesday, July 6, 2016 10:15:41 AM CEST Fabio Estevam wrote: > I think the correct fix here would be: > > --- a/drivers/pinctrl/freescale/pinctrl-imx21.c > +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/freescale/pinctrl-imx21.c > @@ -325,7 +325,6 @@ static const struct of_device_id imx21_pinctrl_of_match[] > = >

Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: imx21: include linux/module.h

Hi Arnd, On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 9:52 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > The pinctrl driver includes a device table, but the macro used for > declaring it is declared in a header that is not visible here: > > drivers/pinctrl/freescale/pinctrl-imx21.c:328:1: error: data definition has > no

Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: imx21: include linux/module.h

Hi Arnd, On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 9:52 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > The pinctrl driver includes a device table, but the macro used for > declaring it is declared in a header that is not visible here: > > drivers/pinctrl/freescale/pinctrl-imx21.c:328:1: error: data definition has > no type or

[PATCH] pinctrl: imx21: include linux/module.h

The pinctrl driver includes a device table, but the macro used for declaring it is declared in a header that is not visible here: drivers/pinctrl/freescale/pinctrl-imx21.c:328:1: error: data definition has no type or storage class [-Werror] MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, imx21_pinctrl_of_match); This

[PATCH] pinctrl: imx21: include linux/module.h

The pinctrl driver includes a device table, but the macro used for declaring it is declared in a header that is not visible here: drivers/pinctrl/freescale/pinctrl-imx21.c:328:1: error: data definition has no type or storage class [-Werror] MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, imx21_pinctrl_of_match); This

[PATCH 2/6] staging: android: sync_debug.c: add include for linux/module.h

Otherwise an apptempt to build sync_debug.o as modules results in compiler errors: CC [M] drivers/staging/android/sync_debug.o drivers/staging/android/sync_debug.c:226:1: warning: data definition has no type or storage class [enabled by default] late_initcall(sync_debugfs_init);

[PATCH 2/6] staging: android: sync_debug.c: add include for linux/module.h

/drivers/staging/android/sync_debug.c index 91ed2c4..a452975 100644 --- a/drivers/staging/android/sync_debug.c +++ b/drivers/staging/android/sync_debug.c @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ #include linux/uaccess.h #include linux/anon_inodes.h #include linux/time64.h +#include linux/module.h #include sync.h #ifdef

[PATCH 32/46] kernel: Add prototype declaration to header file include/linux/module.h

Add prototype definition of function to header file include/linux/module.h because it is used by more than one file. This eliminates the following warning in kernel/module.c: kernel/module.c:3823:6: warning: no previous prototype for ‘module_layout’ [-Wmissing-prototypes] Signed-off-by: Rashika

[PATCH 32/46] kernel: Add prototype declaration to header file include/linux/module.h

Add prototype definition of function to header file include/linux/module.h because it is used by more than one file. This eliminates the following warning in kernel/module.c: kernel/module.c:3823:6: warning: no previous prototype for ‘module_layout’ [-Wmissing-prototypes] Signed-off-by: Rashika

Re: [PATCH 1/3] mfd: pm8921: include missing linux/module.h

On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 04:01:26PM +0900, Jingoo Han wrote: Include in order to fix the following errors. drivers/mfd/pm8921-core.c:209:16: error: expected declaration specifiers or '...' before string constant drivers/mfd/pm8921-core.c:210:20: error: expected declaration specifiers or '...'

Re: [PATCH 1/3] mfd: pm8921: include missing linux/module.h

On Tue, 20 Aug 2013, Jingoo Han wrote: > Include in order to fix the following errors. > > drivers/mfd/pm8921-core.c:209:16: error: expected declaration specifiers or > '...' before string constant > drivers/mfd/pm8921-core.c:210:20: error: expected declaration specifiers or > '...' before

[PATCH 1/3] mfd: pm8921: include missing linux/module.h

Include in order to fix the following errors. drivers/mfd/pm8921-core.c:209:16: error: expected declaration specifiers or '...' before string constant drivers/mfd/pm8921-core.c:210:20: error: expected declaration specifiers or '...' before string constant drivers/mfd/pm8921-core.c:211:16:

[PATCH 1/3] mfd: pm8921: include missing linux/module.h

Include linux/module.h in order to fix the following errors. drivers/mfd/pm8921-core.c:209:16: error: expected declaration specifiers or '...' before string constant drivers/mfd/pm8921-core.c:210:20: error: expected declaration specifiers or '...' before string constant drivers/mfd/pm8921

Re: [PATCH 1/3] mfd: pm8921: include missing linux/module.h

On Tue, 20 Aug 2013, Jingoo Han wrote: Include linux/module.h in order to fix the following errors. drivers/mfd/pm8921-core.c:209:16: error: expected declaration specifiers or '...' before string constant drivers/mfd/pm8921-core.c:210:20: error: expected declaration specifiers

Re: [PATCH 1/3] mfd: pm8921: include missing linux/module.h

On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 04:01:26PM +0900, Jingoo Han wrote: Include linux/module.h in order to fix the following errors. drivers/mfd/pm8921-core.c:209:16: error: expected declaration specifiers or '...' before string constant drivers/mfd/pm8921-core.c:210:20: error: expected declaration

Re: [PATCH 3/3] proc_devtree: Replace include linux/module.h with linux/export.h

Hi, On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 9:48 PM, Syam Sidhardhan wrote: > Since it uses only THIS_MODULE macro, include > is the right to go here. > > Signed-off-by: Syam Sidhardhan > --- > fs/proc/proc_devtree.c |2 +- > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git

Re: [PATCH 3/3] proc_devtree: Replace include linux/module.h with linux/export.h

(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c b/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c index df7dd08..0e9df31 100644 --- a/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c +++ b/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ #include linux/stat.h #include linux/string.h #include linux/of.h -#include linux/module.h +#include

[PATCH 3/3] proc_devtree: Replace include linux/module.h with linux/export.h

Since it uses only THIS_MODULE macro, include is the right to go here. Signed-off-by: Syam Sidhardhan --- fs/proc/proc_devtree.c |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c b/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c index df7dd08..0e9df31 100644 ---

[PATCH 3/3] proc_devtree: Replace include linux/module.h with linux/export.h

df7dd08..0e9df31 100644 --- a/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c +++ b/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ #include linux/stat.h #include linux/string.h #include linux/of.h -#include linux/module.h +#include linux/export.h #include linux/slab.h #include asm/prom.h #include asm/uaccess.h -- 1.7.4.1

[ 21/84] ixp4xx_hss: fix build failure due to missing linux/module.h inclusion

includes linux/netdevice.h which includes linux/netprio_cgroup.h which used to include linux/module.h. The real issue was actually present since the initial commit that added this driver since it uses macros from linux/module.h without including this file. Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli Signed-off

[ 034/120] ixp4xx_hss: fix build failure due to missing linux/module.h inclusion

includes linux/netdevice.h which includes linux/netprio_cgroup.h which used to include linux/module.h. The real issue was actually present since the initial commit that added this driver since it uses macros from linux/module.h without including this file. Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli Signed-off

[ 037/133] ixp4xx_hss: fix build failure due to missing linux/module.h inclusion

includes linux/netdevice.h which includes linux/netprio_cgroup.h which used to include linux/module.h. The real issue was actually present since the initial commit that added this driver since it uses macros from linux/module.h without including this file. Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli Signed-off

[ 037/133] ixp4xx_hss: fix build failure due to missing linux/module.h inclusion

linux/hdlc.h which includes linux/netdevice.h which includes linux/netprio_cgroup.h which used to include linux/module.h. The real issue was actually present since the initial commit that added this driver since it uses macros from linux/module.h without including this file. Signed-off-by: Florian

[ 034/120] ixp4xx_hss: fix build failure due to missing linux/module.h inclusion

linux/hdlc.h which includes linux/netdevice.h which includes linux/netprio_cgroup.h which used to include linux/module.h. The real issue was actually present since the initial commit that added this driver since it uses macros from linux/module.h without including this file. Signed-off-by: Florian

[ 21/84] ixp4xx_hss: fix build failure due to missing linux/module.h inclusion

linux/hdlc.h which includes linux/netdevice.h which includes linux/netprio_cgroup.h which used to include linux/module.h. The real issue was actually present since the initial commit that added this driver since it uses macros from linux/module.h without including this file. Signed-off-by: Florian

[ 085/108] ixp4xx_hss: fix build failure due to missing linux/module.h inclusion

includes linux/netdevice.h which includes linux/netprio_cgroup.h which used to include linux/module.h. The real issue was actually present since the initial commit that added this driver since it uses macros from linux/module.h without including this file. Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli Signed-off

[ 085/108] ixp4xx_hss: fix build failure due to missing linux/module.h inclusion

linux/hdlc.h which includes linux/netdevice.h which includes linux/netprio_cgroup.h which used to include linux/module.h. The real issue was actually present since the initial commit that added this driver since it uses macros from linux/module.h without including this file. Signed-off-by: Florian

[PATCH] NOMMU: mm/nommu.c needs linux/module.h

From: David Howells <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> mm/nommu.c needs to #include linux/module.h for it to understand EXPORT_*() macros. Signed-off-by: David Howells <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- mm/nommu.c |1 + 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/mm/nommu.c b/mm/n

[PATCH] NOMMU: mm/nommu.c needs linux/module.h

From: David Howells [EMAIL PROTECTED] mm/nommu.c needs to #include linux/module.h for it to understand EXPORT_*() macros. Signed-off-by: David Howells [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- mm/nommu.c |1 + 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/mm/nommu.c b/mm/nommu.c index 8f09333

Re: No linux/module.h

On 09/26/2007 10:25 PM, Kristof Provost wrote: > On 2007-09-26 11:29:33 (+0100), mahamuni ashish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I am writing simple kernel module. >> I have included linux/module.h >> compiler gives me error that no such file, I also >> search

Re: No linux/module.h

On 2007-09-26 11:29:33 (+0100), mahamuni ashish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am writing simple kernel module. > I have included linux/module.h > compiler gives me error that no such file, I also > searched it on my machine. > It really doesn't exist. I am using fedora

No linux/module.h

I am writing simple kernel module. I have included linux/module.h compiler gives me error that no such file, I also searched it on my machine. It really doesn't exist. I am using fedora 6. How do I install required libraries. Did you know? You can CHAT without downloading messenger. Go

No linux/module.h

I am writing simple kernel module. I have included linux/module.h compiler gives me error that no such file, I also searched it on my machine. It really doesn't exist. I am using fedora 6. How do I install required libraries. Did you know? You can CHAT without downloading messenger. Go

Re: No linux/module.h

On 2007-09-26 11:29:33 (+0100), mahamuni ashish [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am writing simple kernel module. I have included linux/module.h compiler gives me error that no such file, I also searched it on my machine. It really doesn't exist. I am using fedora 6. How do I install required

Re: No linux/module.h

On 09/26/2007 10:25 PM, Kristof Provost wrote: On 2007-09-26 11:29:33 (+0100), mahamuni ashish [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am writing simple kernel module. I have included linux/module.h compiler gives me error that no such file, I also searched it on my machine. It really doesn't exist. I am

Re: [PATCH] arm26: remove duplicate include of linux/module.h

On Sun, 29 Jul 2007, Jesper Juhl wrote: > Hi, > > This patch removes the duplicate inclusion of > linux/module.h from arm26. is it really worth doing any cleanup of arm26 given the recent discussion of tossing it ent

[PATCH] arm26: remove duplicate include of linux/module.h

Hi, This patch removes the duplicate inclusion of linux/module.h from arm26. Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- arch/arm26/kernel/armksyms.c |1 - 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm26/kernel/armksyms.c b/arch/arm26/kernel/armk

[PATCH] arm26: remove duplicate include of linux/module.h

Hi, This patch removes the duplicate inclusion of linux/module.h from arm26. Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- arch/arm26/kernel/armksyms.c |1 - 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm26/kernel/armksyms.c b/arch/arm26/kernel/armksyms.c

Re: [PATCH] arm26: remove duplicate include of linux/module.h

On Sun, 29 Jul 2007, Jesper Juhl wrote: Hi, This patch removes the duplicate inclusion of linux/module.h from arm26. is it really worth doing any cleanup of arm26 given the recent discussion of tossing it entirely? rday

[2.6 patch] arch/v850/kernel/process.c must #include linux/module.h

/a.out.h #include linux/reboot.h +#include linux/module.h #include asm/uaccess.h #include asm/system.h - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read

Re: [PATCH] linux/sysdev.h needs to include linux/module.h

On Sat, 24 Feb 2007 12:22:11 + Ralf Baechle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: sysdev.h uses THIS_MODULE so should include linux/module.h. Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle [EMAIL PROTECTED] diff --git a/include/linux/sysdev.h b/include/linux/sysdev.h index 389ccf8..e699ab2 100644 --- a/include

Re: [PATCH] linux/sysdev.h needs to include linux/module.h

On Sat, 24 Feb 2007 12:22:11 + Ralf Baechle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: sysdev.h uses THIS_MODULE so should include linux/module.h. Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle [EMAIL PROTECTED] diff --git a/include/linux/sysdev.h b/include/linux/sysdev.h index 389ccf8..e699ab2 100644 --- a/include

[PATCH] linux/sysdev.h needs to include linux/module.h

sysdev.h uses THIS_MODULE so should include linux/module.h. Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle [EMAIL PROTECTED] diff --git a/include/linux/sysdev.h b/include/linux/sysdev.h index 389ccf8..e699ab2 100644 --- a/include/linux/sysdev.h +++ b/include/linux/sysdev.h @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ #define _SYSDEV_H_

Re: [patch 09/12] include/linux/module.h - compile warning cleanup

TECTED]> > Signed-off-by: Domen Puncer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > --- > > > kj-domen/include/linux/module.h |5 - > 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff -puN include/linux/module.h~extinguish_warnings-include_linux_module.h > include/linux/mod

Re: [patch 09/12] include/linux/module.h - compile warning cleanup

[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- kj-domen/include/linux/module.h |5 - 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff -puN include/linux/module.h~extinguish_warnings-include_linux_module.h include/linux/module.h --- kj/include/linux/module.h~extinguish_warnings

[patch 09/12] include/linux/module.h - compile warning cleanup

PROTECTED]> --- kj-domen/include/linux/module.h |5 - 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff -puN include/linux/module.h~extinguish_warnings-include_linux_module.h include/linux/module.h --- kj/include/linux/module.h~extinguish_warnings-include_linux_module.h 2005

[patch 09/12] include/linux/module.h - compile warning cleanup

-domen/include/linux/module.h |5 - 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff -puN include/linux/module.h~extinguish_warnings-include_linux_module.h include/linux/module.h --- kj/include/linux/module.h~extinguish_warnings-include_linux_module.h 2005-03-05 16:12:03.0

Re: PATCH: linux-2.4.0-test12pre8/include/linux/module.h breaks sysklogd compilation

On Mon, Dec 11, 2000 at 07:53:05PM -0600, Peter Samuelson wrote: > > [Mohammad A. Haque] > > Wasn't there discussion that user space apps shouldn't include kernel > > headers? > > Oh, it's been discussed, many times. Here is my executive summary of > why nobody needs to use kernel headers in

Re: PATCH: linux-2.4.0-test12pre8/include/linux/module.h breaks sysklogd compilation

On Mon, Dec 11, 2000 at 07:53:05PM -0600, Peter Samuelson wrote: [Mohammad A. Haque] Wasn't there discussion that user space apps shouldn't include kernel headers? Oh, it's been discussed, many times. Here is my executive summary of why nobody needs to use kernel headers in userspace

Re: PATCH: linux-2.4.0-test12pre8/include/linux/module.h breaks sysklogd compilation

[Mohammad A. Haque] > Wasn't there discussion that user space apps shouldn't include kernel > headers? Oh, it's been discussed, many times. Here is my executive summary of why nobody needs to use kernel headers in userspace programs, *EVER*: Q: I want to #include but I get compile errors,

Re: PATCH: linux-2.4.0-test12pre8/include/linux/module.h breaks sysklogd compilation

} User space applications _must_ not include kernel headers. Even } modutils does not include linux/module.h, it has its own portable } (kernels 2.0 - 2.4) version. There are cases where a user-program _must_ include kernel headers. Some glibc versions have incorrect values for MCL_* and asm

Re: PATCH: linux-2.4.0-test12pre8/include/linux/module.h breaks sysklogd compilation

Wasn't there discussion that user space apps shouldn't include kernel headers? "Adam J. Richter" wrote: > > linux-2.4.0test12pre8/include/linux/module.h contains some > kernel-specific declarations that now reference struct list_head, which > which is only defined

Re: PATCH: linux-2.4.0-test12pre8/include/linux/module.h breaks sysklogd compilation

On Mon, 11 Dec 2000 14:59:01 -0800, "Adam J. Richter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > linux-2.4.0test12pre8/include/linux/module.h contains some >kernel-specific declarations that now reference struct list_head, which >which is only defined when __KERNEL__ is s

PATCH: linux-2.4.0-test12pre8/include/linux/module.h breaks sysklogd compilation

linux-2.4.0test12pre8/include/linux/module.h contains some kernel-specific declarations that now reference struct list_head, which which is only defined when __KERNEL__ is set. This causes sysklogd and probably any other user level program that needs to include to fail to compile

PATCH: linux-2.4.0-test12pre8/include/linux/module.h breaks sysklogd compilation

linux-2.4.0test12pre8/include/linux/module.h contains some kernel-specific declarations that now reference struct list_head, which which is only defined when __KERNEL__ is set. This causes sysklogd and probably any other user level program that needs to include linux/module.h to fail

Re: PATCH: linux-2.4.0-test12pre8/include/linux/module.h breaks sysklogd compilation

On Mon, 11 Dec 2000 14:59:01 -0800, "Adam J. Richter" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: linux-2.4.0test12pre8/include/linux/module.h contains some kernel-specific declarations that now reference struct list_head, which which is only defined when __KERNEL__ is set. This cause

Re: PATCH: linux-2.4.0-test12pre8/include/linux/module.h breaks sysklogd compilation

Wasn't there discussion that user space apps shouldn't include kernel headers? "Adam J. Richter" wrote: linux-2.4.0test12pre8/include/linux/module.h contains some kernel-specific declarations that now reference struct list_head, which which is only defined when __KERNE

Re: PATCH: linux-2.4.0-test12pre8/include/linux/module.h breaks sysklogd compilation

} User space applications _must_ not include kernel headers. Even } modutils does not include linux/module.h, it has its own portable } (kernels 2.0 - 2.4) version. There are cases where a user-program _must_ include kernel headers. Some glibc versions have incorrect values for MCL_* and asm

Re: PATCH: linux-2.4.0-test12pre8/include/linux/module.h breaks sysklogd compilation

[Mohammad A. Haque] Wasn't there discussion that user space apps shouldn't include kernel headers? Oh, it's been discussed, many times. Here is my executive summary of why nobody needs to use kernel headers in userspace programs, *EVER*: Q: I want to #include linux/foo.h but I get compile