On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 5:18 PM, David Rientjes wrote:
>
> You want to carry a dummy tunable forever?
Feel free to make it non-dummy.
> If not, then how long if two years isn't sufficient?
What part of "We don't break user space" do you have trouble understanding?
There is no time limit. It's
On Mon, 12 Nov 2012, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> The work-around might be as simple as creating an oom_adj file that
> simply doesn't do anything.
>
You want to carry a dummy tunable forever? If not, then how long if two
years isn't sufficient?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsu
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 1:41 PM, David Rientjes wrote:
>
> This is
> http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/unassigned-bugs/2010-December/016850.html
> from almost two years ago. The tunable had been on the feature removal
> schedule for two years and would have emitted a warning if you had run on
> any k
On Mon, 12 Nov 2012, Artem S. Tashkinov wrote:
> Hello,
>
> If I remember correctly kernel developers promised not to break user APIs in
> the Linux kernel
> however in Linux 3.7 a /proc//oom_adj file has been totally removed
> which makes KDE 3.5.x
> (and I suppose TDE) unusable as they depend
Hello,
If I remember correctly kernel developers promised not to break user APIs in
the Linux kernel
however in Linux 3.7 a /proc//oom_adj file has been totally removed which
makes KDE 3.5.x
(and I suppose TDE) unusable as they depend on this file and simply refuse to
start in its absence.
Als
5 matches
Mail list logo
