Re: OSS Audio borked between 2.6.6 and 2.6.10

2005-03-21 Thread Greg Stark
Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Greg Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > Herbert tells me that this might be fixed in 2.6.11. Did you try that? > > > > Nope. I'll try that. > > Did it work? Oops, sorry I didn't get back.

Re: OSS Audio borked between 2.6.6 and 2.6.10

2005-03-21 Thread Andrew Morton
Greg Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Herbert tells me that this might be fixed in 2.6.11. Did you try that? > > Nope. I'll try that. > Did it work? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a

Re: OSS Audio borked between 2.6.6 and 2.6.10

2005-03-21 Thread Andrew Morton
Greg Stark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Herbert tells me that this might be fixed in 2.6.11. Did you try that? Nope. I'll try that. Did it work? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to

Re: OSS Audio borked between 2.6.6 and 2.6.10

2005-03-21 Thread Greg Stark
Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Greg Stark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Herbert tells me that this might be fixed in 2.6.11. Did you try that? Nope. I'll try that. Did it work? Oops, sorry I didn't get back. Yes. It works fine in

Re: OSS Audio borked between 2.6.6 and 2.6.10

2005-03-14 Thread John W. Linville
On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 10:40:27AM -0500, Greg Stark wrote: > Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Herbert tells me that this might be fixed in 2.6.11. Did you try that? > > Nope. I'll try that. > > > (Though I'm skeptical. It went from 2.6.6 to 2.6.10 without being noticed but >

Re: OSS Audio borked between 2.6.6 and 2.6.10

2005-03-14 Thread Greg Stark
Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Herbert tells me that this might be fixed in 2.6.11. Did you try that? Nope. I'll try that. (Though I'm skeptical. It went from 2.6.6 to 2.6.10 without being noticed but now it's fixed without any reports?) -- greg - To unsubscribe from this

Re: OSS Audio borked between 2.6.6 and 2.6.10

2005-03-14 Thread John W. Linville
On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 03:59:06AM -0500, Greg Stark wrote: > Well, I built a slew of kernels but found it on the first reboot. > > 2.6.7 doesn't work. > > 2.6.7: > > [sound/oss] remove bogus CIV_TO_LVI > > > > This patch removes a pair of bogus LVI assignments. The explanation

Re: OSS Audio borked between 2.6.6 and 2.6.10

2005-03-14 Thread Andrew Morton
Greg Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Greg Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > > > Are you able to narrow it down to something more fine grained than > "between > > > > 2.6.6 and 2.6.9-rc1"? > > > > > > Er, I suppose I

Re: OSS Audio borked between 2.6.6 and 2.6.10

2005-03-14 Thread Greg Stark
> Greg Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > Are you able to narrow it down to something more fine grained than > > > "between > > > 2.6.6 and 2.6.9-rc1"? > > > > Er, I suppose I would have to build some more kernels. Ugh. Is there a good

Re: OSS Audio borked between 2.6.6 and 2.6.10

2005-03-14 Thread Greg Stark
Greg Stark [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Are you able to narrow it down to something more fine grained than between 2.6.6 and 2.6.9-rc1? Er, I suppose I would have to build some more kernels. Ugh. Is there a good place to start or do I

Re: OSS Audio borked between 2.6.6 and 2.6.10

2005-03-14 Thread Andrew Morton
Greg Stark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Greg Stark [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Are you able to narrow it down to something more fine grained than between 2.6.6 and 2.6.9-rc1? Er, I suppose I would have to build some more

Re: OSS Audio borked between 2.6.6 and 2.6.10

2005-03-14 Thread John W. Linville
On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 03:59:06AM -0500, Greg Stark wrote: Well, I built a slew of kernels but found it on the first reboot. 2.6.7 doesn't work. 2.6.7: [sound/oss] remove bogus CIV_TO_LVI This patch removes a pair of bogus LVI assignments. The explanation in

Re: OSS Audio borked between 2.6.6 and 2.6.10

2005-03-14 Thread Greg Stark
Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Herbert tells me that this might be fixed in 2.6.11. Did you try that? Nope. I'll try that. (Though I'm skeptical. It went from 2.6.6 to 2.6.10 without being noticed but now it's fixed without any reports?) -- greg - To unsubscribe from this list:

Re: OSS Audio borked between 2.6.6 and 2.6.10

2005-03-14 Thread John W. Linville
On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 10:40:27AM -0500, Greg Stark wrote: Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Herbert tells me that this might be fixed in 2.6.11. Did you try that? Nope. I'll try that. (Though I'm skeptical. It went from 2.6.6 to 2.6.10 without being noticed but now it's

Re: OSS Audio borked between 2.6.6 and 2.6.10

2005-03-13 Thread Andrew Morton
Greg Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > The 2.6.6 i810_audio.c compiles OK in current kernels with the below patch > > applied. > > This would be a good time to learn the right way to do this: how do I build a > driver from a kernel tree

Re: OSS Audio borked between 2.6.6 and 2.6.10

2005-03-13 Thread Greg Stark
Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The 2.6.6 i810_audio.c compiles OK in current kernels with the below patch > applied. This would be a good time to learn the right way to do this: how do I build a driver from a kernel tree without building the whole tree? Like, if I copy the 2.6.6

Re: OSS Audio borked between 2.6.6 and 2.6.10

2005-03-13 Thread Andrew Morton
Greg Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Greg Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > Are you able to narrow it down to something more fine grained than > "between > > > 2.6.6 and 2.6.9-rc1"? > > > > Er, I suppose I would have to

Re: OSS Audio borked between 2.6.6 and 2.6.10

2005-03-13 Thread Greg Stark
Greg Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Are you able to narrow it down to something more fine grained than "between > > 2.6.6 and 2.6.9-rc1"? > > Er, I suppose I would have to build some more kernels. Ugh. Is there a good > place to start or do I

Re: OSS Audio borked between 2.6.6 and 2.6.10

2005-03-13 Thread Andrew Morton
Greg Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I would agree with that. If it's in the tree and the config system offers > > it, it should work. And if it _used_ to work, and no longer does so then > > double bad. > > Er, yeah, it's not like this is a

Re: OSS Audio borked between 2.6.6 and 2.6.10

2005-03-13 Thread Greg Stark
Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I would agree with that. If it's in the tree and the config system offers > it, it should work. And if it _used_ to work, and no longer does so then > double bad. Er, yeah, it's not like this is a new card that some crufty old driver never supported

Re: OSS Audio borked between 2.6.6 and 2.6.10

2005-03-13 Thread Andrew Morton
Greg Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > In any case "X code is broken" "why not use Y code instead" isn't really > productive. It's a good thing I was using the OSS drivers; if everyone used > the alsa drivers and nobody was testing the OSS drivers nobody would know > they > were broken. I

Re: OSS Audio borked between 2.6.6 and 2.6.10

2005-03-13 Thread Greg Stark
Alistair John Strachan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The intel8x0 driver is probably one of the most widely used ALSA drivers, so > I'd hope it wasn't broken! I would have hoped so too at the time. Reporting it to the list didn't get any response since it was already fixed upstream, but it

Re: OSS Audio borked between 2.6.6 and 2.6.10

2005-03-13 Thread Alistair John Strachan
On Sunday 13 March 2005 22:26, you wrote: > Patrick McFarland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On Saturday 12 March 2005 01:31 pm, Greg Stark wrote: > > > OSS Audio doesn't work properly for Quake3 in 2.6.10 but it worked in > > > 2.6.6. In fact I have the same problems in 2.6.9-rc1 so I assume

Re: OSS Audio borked between 2.6.6 and 2.6.10

2005-03-13 Thread Martin Schlemmer
On Sun, 2005-03-13 at 17:26 -0500, Greg Stark wrote: > Patrick McFarland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Saturday 12 March 2005 01:31 pm, Greg Stark wrote: > > > OSS Audio doesn't work properly for Quake3 in 2.6.10 but it worked in > > > 2.6.6. In fact I have the same problems in 2.6.9-rc1

Re: OSS Audio borked between 2.6.6 and 2.6.10

2005-03-13 Thread Greg Stark
Patrick McFarland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Saturday 12 March 2005 01:31 pm, Greg Stark wrote: > > OSS Audio doesn't work properly for Quake3 in 2.6.10 but it worked in > > 2.6.6. In fact I have the same problems in 2.6.9-rc1 so I assume 2.6.9 is > > affected as well. This is with the

Re: OSS Audio borked between 2.6.6 and 2.6.10

2005-03-13 Thread Greg Stark
Patrick McFarland [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Saturday 12 March 2005 01:31 pm, Greg Stark wrote: OSS Audio doesn't work properly for Quake3 in 2.6.10 but it worked in 2.6.6. In fact I have the same problems in 2.6.9-rc1 so I assume 2.6.9 is affected as well. This is with the Intel i810

Re: OSS Audio borked between 2.6.6 and 2.6.10

2005-03-13 Thread Martin Schlemmer
On Sun, 2005-03-13 at 17:26 -0500, Greg Stark wrote: Patrick McFarland [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Saturday 12 March 2005 01:31 pm, Greg Stark wrote: OSS Audio doesn't work properly for Quake3 in 2.6.10 but it worked in 2.6.6. In fact I have the same problems in 2.6.9-rc1 so I assume

Re: OSS Audio borked between 2.6.6 and 2.6.10

2005-03-13 Thread Alistair John Strachan
On Sunday 13 March 2005 22:26, you wrote: Patrick McFarland [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Saturday 12 March 2005 01:31 pm, Greg Stark wrote: OSS Audio doesn't work properly for Quake3 in 2.6.10 but it worked in 2.6.6. In fact I have the same problems in 2.6.9-rc1 so I assume 2.6.9 is

Re: OSS Audio borked between 2.6.6 and 2.6.10

2005-03-13 Thread Greg Stark
Alistair John Strachan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The intel8x0 driver is probably one of the most widely used ALSA drivers, so I'd hope it wasn't broken! I would have hoped so too at the time. Reporting it to the list didn't get any response since it was already fixed upstream, but it took a

Re: OSS Audio borked between 2.6.6 and 2.6.10

2005-03-13 Thread Andrew Morton
Greg Stark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In any case X code is broken why not use Y code instead isn't really productive. It's a good thing I was using the OSS drivers; if everyone used the alsa drivers and nobody was testing the OSS drivers nobody would know they were broken. I would agree

Re: OSS Audio borked between 2.6.6 and 2.6.10

2005-03-13 Thread Greg Stark
Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I would agree with that. If it's in the tree and the config system offers it, it should work. And if it _used_ to work, and no longer does so then double bad. Er, yeah, it's not like this is a new card that some crufty old driver never supported well.

Re: OSS Audio borked between 2.6.6 and 2.6.10

2005-03-13 Thread Andrew Morton
Greg Stark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I would agree with that. If it's in the tree and the config system offers it, it should work. And if it _used_ to work, and no longer does so then double bad. Er, yeah, it's not like this is a new card that

Re: OSS Audio borked between 2.6.6 and 2.6.10

2005-03-13 Thread Greg Stark
Greg Stark [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Are you able to narrow it down to something more fine grained than between 2.6.6 and 2.6.9-rc1? Er, I suppose I would have to build some more kernels. Ugh. Is there a good place to start or do I have to just

Re: OSS Audio borked between 2.6.6 and 2.6.10

2005-03-13 Thread Andrew Morton
Greg Stark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Greg Stark [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Are you able to narrow it down to something more fine grained than between 2.6.6 and 2.6.9-rc1? Er, I suppose I would have to build some more kernels. Ugh.

Re: OSS Audio borked between 2.6.6 and 2.6.10

2005-03-13 Thread Greg Stark
Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The 2.6.6 i810_audio.c compiles OK in current kernels with the below patch applied. This would be a good time to learn the right way to do this: how do I build a driver from a kernel tree without building the whole tree? Like, if I copy the 2.6.6

Re: OSS Audio borked between 2.6.6 and 2.6.10

2005-03-13 Thread Andrew Morton
Greg Stark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The 2.6.6 i810_audio.c compiles OK in current kernels with the below patch applied. This would be a good time to learn the right way to do this: how do I build a driver from a kernel tree without building the

Re: OSS Audio borked between 2.6.6 and 2.6.10

2005-03-12 Thread Patrick McFarland
On Saturday 12 March 2005 01:31 pm, Greg Stark wrote: > OSS Audio doesn't work properly for Quake3 in 2.6.10 but it worked in > 2.6.6. In fact I have the same problems in 2.6.9-rc1 so I assume 2.6.9 is > affected as well. This is with the Intel i810 drivers. Why are you not using ALSA? --

OSS Audio borked between 2.6.6 and 2.6.10

2005-03-12 Thread Greg Stark
OSS Audio doesn't work properly for Quake3 in 2.6.10 but it worked in 2.6.6. In fact I have the same problems in 2.6.9-rc1 so I assume 2.6.9 is affected as well. This is with the Intel i810 drivers. Quake3 just prints "dropping sound" over and over again and doesn't output any sound in the

Re: OSS Audio borked between 2.6.6 and 2.6.10

2005-03-12 Thread Patrick McFarland
On Saturday 12 March 2005 01:31 pm, Greg Stark wrote: OSS Audio doesn't work properly for Quake3 in 2.6.10 but it worked in 2.6.6. In fact I have the same problems in 2.6.9-rc1 so I assume 2.6.9 is affected as well. This is with the Intel i810 drivers. Why are you not using ALSA? -- Patrick

OSS Audio borked between 2.6.6 and 2.6.10

2005-03-12 Thread Greg Stark
OSS Audio doesn't work properly for Quake3 in 2.6.10 but it worked in 2.6.6. In fact I have the same problems in 2.6.9-rc1 so I assume 2.6.9 is affected as well. This is with the Intel i810 drivers. Quake3 just prints dropping sound over and over again and doesn't output any sound in the actual