Re: Ok, lets kill the 'PCI hidden behind bridge' message (was: pci=assign-busses)

2007-07-30 Thread Daniel Hazelton
On Monday 30 July 2007 14:35:13 Bernhard Kaindl wrote: > Ok, lets kill the message. As Alois Nešpor also saw, that's fixed up by > Yenta, so PCI does not have to warn about it. PCI could still warn about it > if is_cardbus is 0 in that instance of pci_scan_bridge(), but so far I have > not seen a

Re: Ok, lets kill the 'PCI hidden behind bridge' message (was: pci=assign-busses)

2007-07-30 Thread Greg KH
On Mon, Jul 30, 2007 at 10:11:43PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Mon, Jul 30, 2007 at 08:35:13PM +0200, Bernhard Kaindl wrote: > >... > > --- linux-2.6.22/drivers/pci/probe.c > > +++ linux-2.6.22/drivers/pci/probe.c > > @@ -643,23 +643,24 @@ int pci_scan_bridge(struct pci_bus *bus, > > > > spr

Re: Ok, lets kill the 'PCI hidden behind bridge' message (was: pci=assign-busses)

2007-07-30 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Mon, Jul 30, 2007 at 08:35:13PM +0200, Bernhard Kaindl wrote: >... > --- linux-2.6.22/drivers/pci/probe.c > +++ linux-2.6.22/drivers/pci/probe.c > @@ -643,23 +643,24 @@ int pci_scan_bridge(struct pci_bus *bus, > > sprintf(child->name, (is_cardbus ? "PCI CardBus #%02x" : "PCI Bus > #%02x")

Ok, lets kill the 'PCI hidden behind bridge' message (was: pci=assign-busses)

2007-07-30 Thread Bernhard Kaindl
Adrian Bunk wrote: Alois Nešpor wrote PCI: Bus #0b (-#0e) is hidden behind transparent bridge #0a (-#0b) (try 'pci=assign-busses') Please report the result to linux-kernel to fix this permanently" dmesg: "Yenta: Raising subordinate bus# of parent bus (#0a) from #0b to #0e" without pci=assign-b