On Monday 30 July 2007 14:35:13 Bernhard Kaindl wrote:
> Ok, lets kill the message. As Alois Nešpor also saw, that's fixed up by
> Yenta, so PCI does not have to warn about it. PCI could still warn about it
> if is_cardbus is 0 in that instance of pci_scan_bridge(), but so far I have
> not seen a
On Mon, Jul 30, 2007 at 10:11:43PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 30, 2007 at 08:35:13PM +0200, Bernhard Kaindl wrote:
> >...
> > --- linux-2.6.22/drivers/pci/probe.c
> > +++ linux-2.6.22/drivers/pci/probe.c
> > @@ -643,23 +643,24 @@ int pci_scan_bridge(struct pci_bus *bus,
> >
> > spr
On Mon, Jul 30, 2007 at 08:35:13PM +0200, Bernhard Kaindl wrote:
>...
> --- linux-2.6.22/drivers/pci/probe.c
> +++ linux-2.6.22/drivers/pci/probe.c
> @@ -643,23 +643,24 @@ int pci_scan_bridge(struct pci_bus *bus,
>
> sprintf(child->name, (is_cardbus ? "PCI CardBus #%02x" : "PCI Bus
> #%02x")
Adrian Bunk wrote:
Alois Nešpor wrote
PCI: Bus #0b (-#0e) is hidden behind transparent bridge #0a (-#0b) (try
'pci=assign-busses')
Please report the result to linux-kernel to fix this permanently"
dmesg:
"Yenta: Raising subordinate bus# of parent bus (#0a) from #0b to #0e"
without pci=assign-b
4 matches
Mail list logo