On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 1:44 PM, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-09-02 at 13:35 +0200, Martin van Es wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 12:50 PM, Mike Galbraith
>> wrote:
>> > On Wed, 2015-09-02 at 11:38 +0200, Martin van Es wrote:
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> I recently compiled 4.2.0 based on my pre
On Wed, 2015-09-02 at 13:35 +0200, Martin van Es wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 12:50 PM, Mike Galbraith
> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2015-09-02 at 11:38 +0200, Martin van Es wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I recently compiled 4.2.0 based on my previous 4.1.6 config (make
> >> oldconfig).
> >> On 4.1.6 all co
On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 12:50 PM, Mike Galbraith
wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-09-02 at 11:38 +0200, Martin van Es wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I recently compiled 4.2.0 based on my previous 4.1.6 config (make oldconfig).
>> On 4.1.6 all cores are equally scheduled.
>
> Do you have CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL_ALL enabled?
Y
On Wed, 2015-09-02 at 11:38 +0200, Martin van Es wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I recently compiled 4.2.0 based on my previous 4.1.6 config (make oldconfig).
> On 4.1.6 all cores are equally scheduled.
Do you have CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL_ALL enabled?
-Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "u
Hi,
I recently compiled 4.2.0 based on my previous 4.1.6 config (make oldconfig).
On 4.1.6 all cores are equally scheduled.
This new 4.2.0 kernel however only schedules cpu0 on my 4 cpu i7-3537U
(which is actually 2 cores x 2HT, as far as I understand the specs).
CPU1 is scheduled for 0.5% now an
5 matches
Mail list logo