On 12/19/2007 09:56 AM, Parag Warudkar wrote:
> running on 64-bit kernel. [Also I hear the closed source nVidia binaries
> will not work on this setup - so if you don't need such things you will
> be able to go to a 64-bit kernel w/o reinstalling userspace.]
False, I'm running 100-* nvidia
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007, Nico Schottelius wrote:
If you're running tons of memory, it
really is better to run a 64-bit kernel if possible.
Sure? Afaik that results in a bit slower access to memory and appart
from being able to address MUCH more memory doesn't change the
situation.
No, generally
On 12/19/2007 06:55 AM, Nico Schottelius wrote:
> And updating to 64 Bit kernel also implies changing the userland, so
> a reinstall would be necessary, wouldn't it?
No, if you enable ia32 support.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007, Nico Schottelius wrote:
If you're running tons of memory, it
really is better to run a 64-bit kernel if possible.
Sure? Afaik that results in a bit slower access to memory and appart
from being able to address MUCH more memory doesn't change the
situation.
No, generally
On 12/19/2007 06:55 AM, Nico Schottelius wrote:
And updating to 64 Bit kernel also implies changing the userland, so
a reinstall would be necessary, wouldn't it?
No, if you enable ia32 support.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to
On 12/19/2007 09:56 AM, Parag Warudkar wrote:
running on 64-bit kernel. [Also I hear the closed source nVidia binaries
will not work on this setup - so if you don't need such things you will
be able to go to a 64-bit kernel w/o reinstalling userspace.]
False, I'm running 100-* nvidia drivers
Hello Robert,
Robert Hancock [Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 06:43:22PM -0600]:
> How much RAM is in these machines?
8 GiB
> If you're running tons of memory, it
> really is better to run a 64-bit kernel if possible.
Sure? Afaik that results in a bit slower access to memory and appart
from being able
Nico Schottelius wrote:
Hello!
We are running Debian with 2.6.22-2-686-bigmem on Dell Blade 1955 hardware
and get a Kernel Panic with oom + message that there are no processes
left to kill:
http://home.schottelius.org/~nico/unix/linux/oom_no_killable-2.6.22-1.jpeg
Anyone an idea, what's the
Hello!
We are running Debian with 2.6.22-2-686-bigmem on Dell Blade 1955 hardware
and get a Kernel Panic with oom + message that there are no processes
left to kill:
http://home.schottelius.org/~nico/unix/linux/oom_no_killable-2.6.22-1.jpeg
Anyone an idea, what's the cause for that? This error
Hello!
We are running Debian with 2.6.22-2-686-bigmem on Dell Blade 1955 hardware
and get a Kernel Panic with oom + message that there are no processes
left to kill:
http://home.schottelius.org/~nico/unix/linux/oom_no_killable-2.6.22-1.jpeg
Anyone an idea, what's the cause for that? This error
Nico Schottelius wrote:
Hello!
We are running Debian with 2.6.22-2-686-bigmem on Dell Blade 1955 hardware
and get a Kernel Panic with oom + message that there are no processes
left to kill:
http://home.schottelius.org/~nico/unix/linux/oom_no_killable-2.6.22-1.jpeg
Anyone an idea, what's the
Hello Robert,
Robert Hancock [Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 06:43:22PM -0600]:
How much RAM is in these machines?
8 GiB
If you're running tons of memory, it
really is better to run a 64-bit kernel if possible.
Sure? Afaik that results in a bit slower access to memory and appart
from being able to
12 matches
Mail list logo
