On Sun, Dec 10, 2006 at 03:56:26PM -0500, John Richard Moser wrote:
> > other distros ship a PAE enabled kernel, and use that for NX enabled
> > machines (all NX capable machines support PAE obviously). I'm surprised
> > Ubuntu doesn't, maybe ask them? (Or use a distro that does have this)
> >
On Sun, Dec 10, 2006 at 11:46:44PM -0500, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> If your hardware can run the x86_64 kernel, try using that with your
> i386 userspace. It works here...
Losing vm86() support can cause problems.
--
Matthew Garrett | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the lin
On Sun, 10 Dec 2006 23:58:00 -0500 John Richard Moser wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
>
> Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> > In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > On Sat, 09 Dec 2006 15:39:30 -0500, John Richard Moser wrote:
> >
> >> Is it possible to give some other way
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> On Sat, 09 Dec 2006 15:39:30 -0500, John Richard Moser wrote:
>
>> Is it possible to give some other way to get the hardware NX bit working
>> in 32-bit mode, without the apparently massive
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Sat, 09 Dec 2006 15:39:30 -0500, John Richard Moser wrote:
> Is it possible to give some other way to get the hardware NX bit working
> in 32-bit mode, without the apparently massive performance penalty of
> HIGHMEM64?
If your hardware can run the x86_64 kerne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Apparently (as I've been told today) using a hardware NX bit in a 32-bit
x86 kernel requires PAE mode. PAE mode is enabled with HIGHMEM64, which
is (apparently) extremely slow.
Is it possible to give some other way to get the hardware NX bit working
6 matches
Mail list logo
