Re: PANIC in check_process_timers() running 2.6.11-rc2-mm1

2005-01-25 Thread Alexander Nyberg
> Thanks for tracking that down. It was intended that such things would not > be possible because getting into that code in the first place should be > ruled out while exiting. That removes the requirement for any special case > check in the common path. But, it was done too late since it hadn't

Re: PANIC in check_process_timers() running 2.6.11-rc2-mm1

2005-01-25 Thread Roland McGrath
Thanks for tracking that down. It was intended that such things would not be possible because getting into that code in the first place should be ruled out while exiting. That removes the requirement for any special case check in the common path. But, it was done too late since it hadn't occurre

Re: PANIC in check_process_timers() running 2.6.11-rc2-mm1

2005-01-25 Thread Alexander Nyberg
> Hi Roland > > Just got this running LTP-20050107 on 2.6.11-rc2-mm1, haven't looked > further yet. Box is i386 UP with preempt, I'm putting dmesg at the > bottom of mail. It's possible that the last refcount of signal->live is dropped in do_exit and we're interrupted by the timer leaving nthre

PANIC in check_process_timers() running 2.6.11-rc2-mm1

2005-01-25 Thread Alexander Nyberg
Hi Roland Just got this running LTP-20050107 on 2.6.11-rc2-mm1, haven't looked further yet. Box is i386 UP with preempt, I'm putting dmesg at the bottom of mail. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ nc -u -l -p 7001 divide error: [#1] PREEMPT CPU:0 EIP:0060:[]Not tainted VLI EFLAGS: 00010002