On Fri, 2007-01-19 at 07:43 -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Jan 2007 10:11:10 -0500 Benjamin Romer wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 2007-01-19 at 09:19 +0530, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 02:13:39PM -0500, Benjamin Romer wrote:
> > > [..]
> > > > > >
> > > > > > OK, here's the
Benjamin Romer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, 2007-01-19 at 09:19 +0530, Vivek Goyal wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 02:13:39PM -0500, Benjamin Romer wrote:
>> [..]
>> > > >
>> > > > OK, here's the updated patch that uses the new definition and fixes up
>> > > > the other places that use
On Fri, 19 Jan 2007 10:11:10 -0500 Benjamin Romer wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-01-19 at 09:19 +0530, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 02:13:39PM -0500, Benjamin Romer wrote:
> > [..]
> > > > >
> > > > > OK, here's the updated patch that uses the new definition and fixes up
> > > > > the
On Fri, 2007-01-19 at 09:19 +0530, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 02:13:39PM -0500, Benjamin Romer wrote:
> [..]
> > > >
> > > > OK, here's the updated patch that uses the new definition and fixes up
> > > > the other places that use it. I built and tested this on the ES7000/ONE
> >
On Fri, 2007-01-19 at 09:19 +0530, Vivek Goyal wrote:
On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 02:13:39PM -0500, Benjamin Romer wrote:
[..]
OK, here's the updated patch that uses the new definition and fixes up
the other places that use it. I built and tested this on the ES7000/ONE
and it works
On Fri, 19 Jan 2007 10:11:10 -0500 Benjamin Romer wrote:
On Fri, 2007-01-19 at 09:19 +0530, Vivek Goyal wrote:
On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 02:13:39PM -0500, Benjamin Romer wrote:
[..]
OK, here's the updated patch that uses the new definition and fixes up
the other places that use
Benjamin Romer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, 2007-01-19 at 09:19 +0530, Vivek Goyal wrote:
On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 02:13:39PM -0500, Benjamin Romer wrote:
[..]
OK, here's the updated patch that uses the new definition and fixes up
the other places that use it. I built and
On Fri, 2007-01-19 at 07:43 -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
On Fri, 19 Jan 2007 10:11:10 -0500 Benjamin Romer wrote:
On Fri, 2007-01-19 at 09:19 +0530, Vivek Goyal wrote:
On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 02:13:39PM -0500, Benjamin Romer wrote:
[..]
OK, here's the updated patch that uses
On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 02:13:39PM -0500, Benjamin Romer wrote:
[..]
> > >
> > > OK, here's the updated patch that uses the new definition and fixes up
> > > the other places that use it. I built and tested this on the ES7000/ONE
> > > and it works well. :)
> >
> > Cool.
> >
> > I hate to pick
On Thu, 2007-01-18 at 11:14 -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Benjamin Romer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Thu, 2007-01-18 at 13:30 +0530, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> >> On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 12:10:55AM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> >> > Vivek Goyal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> > >
> >>
Benjamin Romer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, 2007-01-18 at 13:30 +0530, Vivek Goyal wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 12:10:55AM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> > Vivek Goyal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > >
>> > > Or how about making physical_dest field also 8bit like logical_dest
On Thu, 2007-01-18 at 13:30 +0530, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 12:10:55AM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> > Vivek Goyal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > >
> > > Or how about making physical_dest field also 8bit like logical_dest field.
> > > This will work both for 4bit and 8bit
On Thu, 2007-01-18 at 13:30 +0530, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 12:10:55AM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> > Vivek Goyal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > >
> > > Or how about making physical_dest field also 8bit like logical_dest field.
> > > This will work both for 4bit and 8bit
On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 12:10:55AM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Vivek Goyal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > Or how about making physical_dest field also 8bit like logical_dest field.
> > This will work both for 4bit and 8bit physical apic ids at the same time
> > code becomes more
On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 12:10:55AM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
Vivek Goyal [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Or how about making physical_dest field also 8bit like logical_dest field.
This will work both for 4bit and 8bit physical apic ids at the same time
code becomes more intutive and it is
On Thu, 2007-01-18 at 13:30 +0530, Vivek Goyal wrote:
On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 12:10:55AM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
Vivek Goyal [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Or how about making physical_dest field also 8bit like logical_dest field.
This will work both for 4bit and 8bit physical apic
On Thu, 2007-01-18 at 13:30 +0530, Vivek Goyal wrote:
On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 12:10:55AM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
Vivek Goyal [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Or how about making physical_dest field also 8bit like logical_dest field.
This will work both for 4bit and 8bit physical apic
Benjamin Romer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, 2007-01-18 at 13:30 +0530, Vivek Goyal wrote:
On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 12:10:55AM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
Vivek Goyal [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Or how about making physical_dest field also 8bit like logical_dest
field.
This
On Thu, 2007-01-18 at 11:14 -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
Benjamin Romer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, 2007-01-18 at 13:30 +0530, Vivek Goyal wrote:
On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 12:10:55AM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
Vivek Goyal [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Or how about making
On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 02:13:39PM -0500, Benjamin Romer wrote:
[..]
OK, here's the updated patch that uses the new definition and fixes up
the other places that use it. I built and tested this on the ES7000/ONE
and it works well. :)
Cool.
I hate to pick nits by why the double
Vivek Goyal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Hi Eric,
>>
>> In physical destination mode, the destination APIC is determined by
>> APIC ID and in logical destination mode, destination apics are determined
>> by the configurations based on LDR and DFR registers in APIC (Depending
>> on Flat mode
On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 09:11:53AM +0530, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 12:08:48PM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> > Benjamin Romer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > On the Unisys ES7000/ONE system, we encountered a problem where
> > > performing a kexec reboot or dump on any
On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 12:08:48PM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Benjamin Romer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On the Unisys ES7000/ONE system, we encountered a problem where
> > performing a kexec reboot or dump on any cell other than cell 0 causes
> > the system timer to stop working,
Benjamin Romer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On the Unisys ES7000/ONE system, we encountered a problem where
> performing a kexec reboot or dump on any cell other than cell 0 causes
> the system timer to stop working, resulting in a hang during timer
> calibration in the new kernel.
>
> We
On the Unisys ES7000/ONE system, we encountered a problem where
performing a kexec reboot or dump on any cell other than cell 0 causes
the system timer to stop working, resulting in a hang during timer
calibration in the new kernel.
We traced the problem to one line of code in disable_IO_APIC(),
On the Unisys ES7000/ONE system, we encountered a problem where
performing a kexec reboot or dump on any cell other than cell 0 causes
the system timer to stop working, resulting in a hang during timer
calibration in the new kernel.
We traced the problem to one line of code in disable_IO_APIC(),
Benjamin Romer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On the Unisys ES7000/ONE system, we encountered a problem where
performing a kexec reboot or dump on any cell other than cell 0 causes
the system timer to stop working, resulting in a hang during timer
calibration in the new kernel.
We traced the
On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 12:08:48PM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
Benjamin Romer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On the Unisys ES7000/ONE system, we encountered a problem where
performing a kexec reboot or dump on any cell other than cell 0 causes
the system timer to stop working, resulting in
On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 09:11:53AM +0530, Vivek Goyal wrote:
On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 12:08:48PM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
Benjamin Romer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On the Unisys ES7000/ONE system, we encountered a problem where
performing a kexec reboot or dump on any cell other
Vivek Goyal [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi Eric,
In physical destination mode, the destination APIC is determined by
APIC ID and in logical destination mode, destination apics are determined
by the configurations based on LDR and DFR registers in APIC (Depending
on Flat mode or cluster
30 matches
Mail list logo
