Hi again,
On Sun, Jul 08, 2001 at 03:26:48AM -0700, Adam J. Richter wrote:
>
> Yes, although that is a task that is never complete. So, I
> would recommend that we adopt a simple test that should work into the
> stock kernels with the expectation that the test will probably be
> refined i
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> I guess this'll still pickup Sony desktops.
> Perhaps we need a survey of lspci -nv results for sony and non-sony
> machines ?
The DMI table might be bettur up to this job instead...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ker
>From: "Robert J.Dunlop" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Hi,
>First off, it works for me on my VAIO PCG-Z600NE.
Great. Thanks for testing it!
[...]
>Just a niggle however. This still isn't a very good test to finding a
>Sony laptop. What'll happen on machines that have any sort of Sony
>plugin de
Hi,
First off, it works for me on my VAIO PCG-Z600NE.
On Sun, Jul 08, 2001 at 09:30:44AM +0100, Adam J. Richter wrote:
> The pci_device_id tables in linux-2.4.7-pre3/drivers/char/sonypi.c
> claims that the driver wants to be loaded on all computers that have
> an that have a PCI device wi
The pci_device_id tables in linux-2.4.7-pre3/drivers/char/sonypi.c
claims that the driver wants to be loaded on all computers that have
an that have a PCI device with vendor id PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL and
a device ID of either PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_82371AB_3 (0x7110) or
PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_82801
5 matches
Mail list logo
