Re: PATCH: tun/tap driver hw address handling

2007-03-24 Thread Ahmed S. Darwish
Hi Brian, On Sat, Mar 24, 2007 at 01:56:50AM -0700, Brian Braunstein wrote: > > Linus, > > According to Documentation/SubmittingPatches "bug fixes" or "obvious" > changes > should CCed to you, so this is why I have done this. > IMHO these days patches got reviewed on LKML, then tested

PATCH: tun/tap driver hw address handling

2007-03-24 Thread Brian Braunstein
Hi Max, Here's the patch we discussed at the beginning of the month. Linus, According to Documentation/SubmittingPatches "bug fixes" or "obvious" changes should CCed to you, so this is why I have done this. Note: This entire email can be found at

PATCH: tun/tap driver hw address handling

2007-03-24 Thread Brian Braunstein
Hi Max, Here's the patch we discussed at the beginning of the month. Linus, According to Documentation/SubmittingPatches bug fixes or obvious changes should CCed to you, so this is why I have done this. Note: This entire email can be found at

Re: PATCH: tun/tap driver hw address handling

2007-03-24 Thread Ahmed S. Darwish
Hi Brian, On Sat, Mar 24, 2007 at 01:56:50AM -0700, Brian Braunstein wrote: Linus, According to Documentation/SubmittingPatches bug fixes or obvious changes should CCed to you, so this is why I have done this. IMHO these days patches got reviewed on LKML, then tested enough on the