On Mon, 2005-04-18 at 14:38 -0500, Linas Vepstas wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> The patch below appears to fix a problem where a number of dead processes
> linger on the system. On a highly loaded system, dozens of processes
> were found stuck in do_exit(), calling thier very last schedule(), and
> then
On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 11:01:25AM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt was heard to
remark:
> On Mon, 2005-04-18 at 14:38 -0500, Linas Vepstas wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > The patch below appears to fix a problem where a number of dead processes
> > linger on the system. On a highly loaded system,
On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 11:07:01AM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt was heard to
remark:
> On Mon, 2005-04-18 at 14:38 -0500, Linas Vepstas wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > The patch below appears to fix a problem where a number of dead processes
> > linger on the system. On a highly loaded system,
On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 11:07:01AM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt was heard to
remark:
On Mon, 2005-04-18 at 14:38 -0500, Linas Vepstas wrote:
Hi,
The patch below appears to fix a problem where a number of dead processes
linger on the system. On a highly loaded system, dozens of
On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 11:01:25AM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt was heard to
remark:
On Mon, 2005-04-18 at 14:38 -0500, Linas Vepstas wrote:
Hi,
The patch below appears to fix a problem where a number of dead processes
linger on the system. On a highly loaded system, dozens of
On Mon, 2005-04-18 at 14:38 -0500, Linas Vepstas wrote:
Hi,
The patch below appears to fix a problem where a number of dead processes
linger on the system. On a highly loaded system, dozens of processes
were found stuck in do_exit(), calling thier very last schedule(), and
then being
On Tue, 2005-04-19 at 11:07 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-04-18 at 14:38 -0500, Linas Vepstas wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > The patch below appears to fix a problem where a number of dead processes
> > linger on the system. On a highly loaded system, dozens of processes
> >
On Mon, 2005-04-18 at 14:38 -0500, Linas Vepstas wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> The patch below appears to fix a problem where a number of dead processes
> linger on the system. On a highly loaded system, dozens of processes
> were found stuck in do_exit(), calling thier very last schedule(), and
> then
On Mon, 2005-04-18 at 14:38 -0500, Linas Vepstas wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> The patch below appears to fix a problem where a number of dead processes
> linger on the system. On a highly loaded system, dozens of processes
> were found stuck in do_exit(), calling thier very last schedule(), and
> then
Hi,
The patch below appears to fix a problem where a number of dead processes
linger on the system. On a highly loaded system, dozens of processes
were found stuck in do_exit(), calling thier very last schedule(), and
then being lost forever.
Processes that are PF_DEAD are cleaned up
Hi,
The patch below appears to fix a problem where a number of dead processes
linger on the system. On a highly loaded system, dozens of processes
were found stuck in do_exit(), calling thier very last schedule(), and
then being lost forever.
Processes that are PF_DEAD are cleaned up
On Mon, 2005-04-18 at 14:38 -0500, Linas Vepstas wrote:
Hi,
The patch below appears to fix a problem where a number of dead processes
linger on the system. On a highly loaded system, dozens of processes
were found stuck in do_exit(), calling thier very last schedule(), and
then being
On Mon, 2005-04-18 at 14:38 -0500, Linas Vepstas wrote:
Hi,
The patch below appears to fix a problem where a number of dead processes
linger on the system. On a highly loaded system, dozens of processes
were found stuck in do_exit(), calling thier very last schedule(), and
then being
On Tue, 2005-04-19 at 11:07 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Mon, 2005-04-18 at 14:38 -0500, Linas Vepstas wrote:
Hi,
The patch below appears to fix a problem where a number of dead processes
linger on the system. On a highly loaded system, dozens of processes
were found
14 matches
Mail list logo
