On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 09:56:45PM +0200, Bodo Eggert wrote:
> The parameter value should IMHO be a pointer to a struct {
> unsigned long long maxspeed; // (with 0 being the magic max. value?)
> int facility; /* 0=general speed, 2=general read, 4=read data,
> 6=read audio, 8=re
On 8/21/05, cHitman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello, folks!
Hi,
Please use user-space solution instead:
http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0411.3/0812.html
Thanks,
Bartlomiej
> This patch implements changing of DVD speed via ioctl() call, like
> CDROM_SELECT_SPEED do. In CDROM_SEL
On Sun, 21 Aug 2005, Chris Wedgwood wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 09:56:45PM +0200, Bodo Eggert wrote:
> > The parameter value should IMHO be a pointer to a struct {
> > unsigned long long maxspeed; // (with 0 being the magic max. value?)
> > int facility; /* 0=general speed, 2=general read,
cHitman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This patch implements changing of DVD speed via ioctl() call, like
> CDROM_SELECT_SPEED do. In CDROM_SELECT_SPEED its implementation isn't
> so good (diffirent values of 1x in KB/s, troubles with return value of
> cdrom_select_speed() and other). I defined CDRO
Hello, folks!
This patch implements changing of DVD speed via ioctl() call, like
CDROM_SELECT_SPEED do. In CDROM_SELECT_SPEED its implementation isn't
so good (diffirent values of 1x in KB/s, troubles with return value of
cdrom_select_speed() and other). I defined CDROM_SELECT_DVDSPEED ioctl
() ca
5 matches
Mail list logo