> > Since Alan has commented on it:
> >
> > http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/12/17/422
> >
> > "5520 in fact is always enabled as it is the host bridge.
> > pci_enable_device_io will do just fine. The 5520 fun is if you disable it
> > the system hangs."
> >
> > I moved on assuming that either submitte
On Sat, Feb 02, 2008 at 09:01:10PM +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> On Saturday 02 February 2008, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > Linux Kernel Mailing List wrote:
> > > Commit: 0948391641918b95d8d96c15089eb5ac156850b3
> >
> > > PCI: Remov
On Saturday 02 February 2008, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Linux Kernel Mailing List wrote:
> > Commit: 0948391641918b95d8d96c15089eb5ac156850b3
>
> > PCI: Remove users of pci_enable_device_bars()
> >
> > This patch converts users of pci_e
Linux Kernel Mailing List wrote:
Commit: 0948391641918b95d8d96c15089eb5ac156850b3
PCI: Remove users of pci_enable_device_bars()
This patch converts users of pci_enable_device_bars() to the new
pci_enable_device_{io,mem} interface.
The new API fits nicely, except
On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 04:14:45PM -0800, Andrew Vasquez wrote:
> On Tue, 08 Jan 2008, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 2008-01-07 at 11:42 -0800, Andrew Vasquez wrote:
> > > That's fine. I take it these patches will be funneled via
> > > gregkh/pci-2.6.git. There's some qla2xxx updat
On Tue, 08 Jan 2008, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-01-07 at 11:42 -0800, Andrew Vasquez wrote:
> > That's fine. I take it these patches will be funneled via
> > gregkh/pci-2.6.git. There's some qla2xxx updates which are queued for
> > post-2.6.24 consumption in jejb/scsi-misc-2.6.
On Mon, 2008-01-07 at 11:42 -0800, Andrew Vasquez wrote:
> That's fine. I take it these patches will be funneled via
> gregkh/pci-2.6.git. There's some qla2xxx updates which are queued for
> post-2.6.24 consumption in jejb/scsi-misc-2.6.git which don't appear
> to have any conflicts.
>
> I do t
On Thu, 20 Dec 2007, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> This patch converts users of pci_enable_device_bars() to the new
> pci_enable_device_{io,mem} interface.
>
> The new API fits nicely, except maybe for the QLA case where a bit of
> code re-organization might be a good idea but I prefer sticking
Just a style nit...
On Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 10:01:14AM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> This patch converts users of pci_enable_device_bars() to the new
> pci_enable_device_{io,mem} interface.
>
> The new API fits nicely, except maybe for the QLA case where a bit of
> code re-organization m
This patch converts users of pci_enable_device_bars() to the new
pci_enable_device_{io,mem} interface.
The new API fits nicely, except maybe for the QLA case where a bit of
code re-organization might be a good idea but I prefer sticking to the
simple patch as I don't have hardware to test on.
I'l
On Tue, 2007-12-18 at 00:07 +, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Dec 2007 10:01:14 +1100
> Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > This patch converts users of pci_enable_device_bars() to the new
> > pci_enable_device_{io,mem} interface.
> >
> > The new API fits nicely, except may
On Tue, 18 Dec 2007 10:01:14 +1100
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This patch converts users of pci_enable_device_bars() to the new
> pci_enable_device_{io,mem} interface.
>
> The new API fits nicely, except maybe for the QLA case where a bit of
> code re-organization might be
This patch converts users of pci_enable_device_bars() to the new
pci_enable_device_{io,mem} interface.
The new API fits nicely, except maybe for the QLA case where a bit of
code re-organization might be a good idea but I prefer sticking to the
simple patch as I don't have hardware to test on.
I'l
13 matches
Mail list logo
