Hi Oleg,
> Is this the only reason why this service keeps its original real-UID?
> (see below)
Allowing the user who invoked my service to send it signals is the main
reason for keeping the original real-UID, but not the only one.
> What if we introduce SA_NOSECURITY? So that if an application
On 11/08, Amnon Shiloh wrote:
>
> > > What I wish is that I could request (using "prctl" or whatever):
> > > "If a non-privileged user sends me a SIGSTOP, then let it be converted
> > > into...",
> >
> > I hope we won't do this ;) But I am not going to argue if you convince
> > other people.
> >
On 11/08, Amnon Shiloh wrote:
What I wish is that I could request (using prctl or whatever):
If a non-privileged user sends me a SIGSTOP, then let it be converted
into...,
I hope we won't do this ;) But I am not going to argue if you convince
other people.
To me it would be
Hi Oleg,
Is this the only reason why this service keeps its original real-UID?
(see below)
Allowing the user who invoked my service to send it signals is the main
reason for keeping the original real-UID, but not the only one.
What if we introduce SA_NOSECURITY? So that if an application
4 matches
Mail list logo
